160 likes | 280 Views
SEIS development and regular environment assessment since the Astana conference. Dr David Stanners Head of International Cooperation European Environment Agency. S hared Environmental Information System From national to regional to global. National assessments. Regional (EEA) assessments.
E N D
SEIS development and regular environment assessment since the Astana conference Dr David Stanners Head of International Cooperation European Environment Agency
Shared Environmental Information SystemFrom national to regional to global National assessments Regional (EEA) assessments National data, information, analyses and assessments Global assessments
SEIS addresses the whole Policy Cycle (1) Issue identification (6) Policy measure effectiveness (2) Issue framing MDIAK Knowledge Base (5) Policy measure implementation (3) Policy measure identification (4) Policy measure development / adoption
SEIS principles Information should be: • managed as close as possible to its source • collected once, and shared with others for many purposes • readily available and easy accessible • accessible to enable users to make comparisons at the appropriate geographical scale • fully available to the general public at national level in the relevant national language(s) • supported through common, free open software standards.
SEIS components • Data • Indicators • Assessments • … Content Infra-structure Co-operation • Networks • Governance • Agreements • … • SDI -Spatial Development Infrastructure • Standards • Web services • …
EEA in cooperation with stakeholders: Developing the basis on which to implement the process: Outline of the process (Oct 2012) Taking stock of progress: Review of progress (Oct 2013) Extending SEIS and the regular assessment process to the pan-European region
In countries: Increased use of core indicators/data flows in national SOERs (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan…) A more sustainable national SOER reporting process (Kyrgyzstan, Georgia…) Modern tools for information sharing (Moldova…) Increased cooperation between networks (env. & statistics..) Reflected in recent EPRs -addressing SEIS and regular reporting (Albania, Croatia, Moldova, Morocco) Where do we see progress? (1)
In Policy and legal initiatives: clear reference to SEIS in 7EAP, Copernicus, Arctic policy… In SEIS-related projects: found across the region ENP/SEIS, FLERMONECA, AWARE, AoA+, Caspian Environment Information System… In organisations: promoting SEIS principles (UNECE, LRTAP, PRTR, RECs, UNEP,…) In global processes: SEIS-related initiatives in Rio+20 outcome, UNEP-Live… However, progress is uneven and information is patchy Where do we see progress? (2)
No joint-responsibility to monitor overall progress in SEIS and regular reporting Required actions: Establish a partnership for regular information exchange (Eionet-type); Exchange data and information from MEAs & organisations & strengthen interaction of existing networks Share tool & methodologies Agree on performance indicators for progress Establish stable governance structure (with sustainable funding) to track & assess progress and coordinate future pan-European reporting Why is progress uneven and information patchy?
No clear responsibility and ownership across the reporting chain Required actions: Consolidate the national SOE reporting base; Increase use/reuse of core indicators Tailor/focus reporting demands on a clear/pre- defined need Review, re-connect and integrate existing processes (pan-European forest, health, EfE; GEO…) Why is progress uneven and information patchy?
Learning from each other:SEIS ENPI - Cookbook • A set of case studies collected from EEA Member and Cooperating countries and ENPI partner countries. • A SEIS Checklist containing a set of questions to help assess the status of SEIS development and identify gaps and areas for further enhancement. • Steps to be considered when planning SEIS implementation. • Useful links. http://www.seiscookbook.net
Through some specific thematic discussions (e.g. PRTR) SEIS side-event in Aarhus MOP in June 2014 “Friends of SEIS” (inputs from the Convention?) Monitoring & evaluation of progress (with clear targets & performance indicators) With Convention support (e.g. promoting the development of regular national SOE reports as input to the 2016 pan-European environmental ministerial) How to bring this process forward
Thank you! www.eea.europa.eu