230 likes | 424 Views
BNFO 602 Phylogenetics. Usman Roshan. Summary of last time. Models of evolution Distance based tree reconstruction Neighbor joining UPGMA. Why phylogenetics?. Study of evolution Origin and migration of humans Origin and spead of disease Many applications in comparative bioinformatics
E N D
BNFO 602 Phylogenetics Usman Roshan
Summary of last time • Models of evolution • Distance based tree reconstruction • Neighbor joining • UPGMA
Why phylogenetics? • Study of evolution • Origin and migration of humans • Origin and spead of disease • Many applications in comparative bioinformatics • Sequence alignment • Motif detection (phylogenetic motifs, evolutionary trace, phylogenetic footprinting) • Correlated mutation (useful for structural contact prediction) • Protein interaction • Gene networks • Vaccine devlopment • And many more…
Maximum Parsimony • Character based method • NP-hard (reduction to the Steiner tree problem) • Widely-used in phylogenetics • Slower than NJ but more accurate • Faster than ML • Assumes i.i.d.
Maximum Parsimony • Input: Set S of n aligned sequences of length k • Output: A phylogenetic tree T • leaf-labeled by sequences in S • additional sequences of length k labeling the internal nodes of T such that is minimized.
Maximum parsimony (example) • Input: Four sequences • ACT • ACA • GTT • GTA • Question: which of the three trees has the best MP scores?
Maximum Parsimony ACT ACT ACA GTA GTT GTT ACA GTA GTA ACA ACT GTT
Maximum Parsimony ACT ACT ACA GTA GTT GTA ACA ACT 2 1 1 3 3 2 GTT GTT ACA GTA MP score = 7 MP score = 5 GTA ACA ACA GTA 2 1 1 ACT GTT MP score = 4 Optimal MP tree
Optimal labeling can be computed in linear time O(nk) GTA ACA ACA GTA 2 1 1 ACT GTT MP score = 4 Finding the optimal MP tree is NP-hard Maximum Parsimony: computational complexity
Local optimum Cost Global optimum Phylogenetic trees Local search strategies
Local search for MP • Determine a candidate solution s • While s is not a local minimum • Find a neighbor s’ of s such that MP(s’)<MP(s) • If found set s=s’ • Else return s and exit • Time complexity: unknown---could take forever or end quickly depending on starting tree and local move • Need to specify how to construct starting tree and local move
Starting tree for MP • Random phylogeny---O(n) time • Greedy-MP
Greedy-MP Greedy-MP takes O(n^2k^2) time
For each edge we get two different topologies Neighborhood size is 2n-6 Local moves for MP: NNI
Neighborhood size is quadratic in number of taxa Computing the minimum number of SPR moves between two rooted phylogenies is NP-hard Local moves for MP: SPR
Local moves for MP: TBR • Neighborhood size is cubic in number of taxa • Computing the minimum number of TBR moves between two rooted phylogenies is NP-hard
Iterated local search: escape local optima by perturbation Local search Local optimum
Iterated local search: escape local optima by perturbation Local search Local optimum Perturbation Output of perturbation
Iterated local search: escape local optima by perturbation Local search Local optimum Perturbation Local search Output of perturbation
ILS for MP • Ratchet (Nixon 1999) • Iterative-DCM3 (Roshan et. al. 2004) • TNT (Goloboff et. al. 1999)
Maximum Likelihood • Find the tree that has the highest likelihood. • Problems: • What is the likelihood of a tree with branch lengths and internal nodes? • What if no internal nodes are given? • Felsenstein’s algorithm • What if no branch lengths are given?
Maximum Likelihood • NP-hard like Maximum Parsimony (MP) • Similar local search heuristics as MP