1 / 1

ICSS

ICSS. Death, stroke, or procedural MI: 8.5% with stenting vs. 5.2% with endarterectomy Any stroke: 7.7% vs. 4.1% (p = 0.002) Death or any stroke: 8.5% vs. 4.7% Death or disabling stroke: 4.0% vs. 3.2% (p = 0.34) All-cause death: 2.3% vs. 0.8% (p = 0.017).

hugh
Download Presentation

ICSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICSS Death, stroke, or procedural MI: 8.5% with stenting vs. 5.2% with endarterectomy Any stroke: 7.7% vs. 4.1% (p = 0.002) Death or any stroke: 8.5% vs. 4.7% Death or disabling stroke: 4.0% vs. 3.2% (p = 0.34) All-cause death: 2.3% vs. 0.8% (p = 0.017) Trial design: Patients with recently symptomatic (within the last year) carotid artery stenosis were randomized to carotid artery stenting (n = 855) versus carotid endarterectomy (n = 858). These are interim results, reported at 4 months. Results (p = 0.006) (p = 0.001) 8.5 8.5 % 5.2 4.7 Conclusions • Among patients with a recent TIA or stroke attributable to significant carotid artery stenosis, carotid artery stenting was associated with an increased hazard of death, stroke, or MI within 4 months compared with carotid endarterectomy Death, stroke, or procedural MI Death or any stroke Carotid stenting Carotid endarterectomy ICSS Investigators. Lancet 2010;Feb 28:[Epub]

More Related