Interactive Board Storyboard

1. Interactive Board Storyboard Lamont Jair Newsome Diffusion and Integration of Educational Technology (EDUC - 7101 - 1) September 29, 2010

2. Innovation-Decision Process Knowledge Stage Persuasion Stage Decision Stage Implementation Confirmation Stage

3. Knowledge/Problem The major problem in Schools and educational settings is the need to be able to effectively teach a diverse group of learners. The use of technological advancements allow the shift of pedagogy to allow teachers to become more effective in reaching learners.

4. Description of Interactive Boards Who developed the interactive board? Why was the interactive board developed? Who can the interactive boards be used with? http://smarttech.com http://education.smarttech.com/ste/en-us http://www.scholastic.com/interactivewhiteboards http://www.amphi.com/departments/technology/whiteboard/lessonplans.html

5. Persuasive Stage Technology used in an effective manner Supportive research Positive feedback from lead users

6. Decision Stage • Effective diffusion of technology • Effective training and support for first users • Positive feedback from teachers • Research that support the effectiveness of product

7. Implementation Stage Advertising Production Manufacturing Support

8. The Need for Interactive Board

9. Further Need

10. Production, Manufacturing, packaging, marketing, and Distribution Prices for Interactive Whiteboards vary, depending on the brand and what is needed, from $750 for just the whiteboard to $6,000 for a whole system. http://www.nextag.com/interactive-whiteboard/compare-html

17. Development

18. Knowledge Stage January 16, 2007 I learned about interactive boards at a technology conference and begun to do further research. http://www.presentationtek.com/2006/06/22/e-beam-interactive-whiteboard-system/

19. Persuasion Stage March 2007 I conducted research on this innovation http://interactivewhiteboardinsights.blogspot.com/2010/05/reasons-why-interactive-whiteboards-are.html

20. Decision Stage September 2007 the ebeam interactive board was presented to our school during in-service. http://www.amphi.com/departments/technology/whiteboard/lessonplans.html

21. Implementation Stage February 2008 our School bought eight ebeams and are expected to buy at least 25 more. http://training.luidia.com/

22. Confirmation Stage April 2009 the State Biology test showed that 98% of my students, who were taught on the ebeam, passed the test. http://www.e-beam.com/education/overview.html

23. S Curve of Interactive Boards Diffusion Rate 100 90 80 70 60 % of Innovation 50 40 30 20 10 1991 1995 2000 2005 2010 Time

24. Key Innovators and Early Adopters

25. Strategies to Persuade

26. Key Laggards

27. Change Agents

28. Centralized or Decentralized Approach

29. Critical Mass

30. Role of the Champion

31. Conclusion

32. http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/sitecore/en/pdf/smart_publications/articlesfromtheceo/2006/2006sbiwbuilttolastusnpupdated07.pdfhttp://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/sitecore/en/pdf/smart_publications/articlesfromtheceo/2006/2006sbiwbuilttolastusnpupdated07.pdf