1 / 7

Con

Supplementary Figure 1. Con. WT. TM.

huong
Download Presentation

Con

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supplementary Figure 1 Con WT TM Supplementary Figure 1. Tumor histopathology of the lungs. (a) Histological examination of lungs of 52-week-old K-rasLA1 mice (x200, bars represent 50µm). Con = control; TM = OPN triple mutant–delivered group; WT= OPN wild type-delivered group.

  2. Supplementary Figure 2 a b

  3. Supplementary Figure 2 (continued) c Supplementary Figure 2. Effects of lentivirus-mediated OPN TM on GALNAc-T1, GALNAc-T2 and OPN expression level. (a) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of GALNAc-T1 in the lungs of K-rasLA1mice. (b) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of GALNAc-T2 in the lungs of K-rasLA1mice. (c) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of OPN in the lungs of K-rasLA1mice.Each barrepresents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). CONTROL = control mice; VECTOR = vector control; OPN TM = OPN TM-delivered group.

  4. Supplementary Figure 3 a OPN Con Vec WT TM Akt p-Akt (Ser473) IKKα/β β α p-mTOR p-p70S6K p-4E-BP1 GAPDH

  5. Supplementary Figure 3 (continued) b Supplementary Figure 3. Effectsof OPN WT and OPN TMon the OPN-mediated signaling pathway in LA-4 cells. (a)Western blot analysis of Akt, p-Akt at Ser473, IKKα/β, p-mTOR, p-p70S6K, p-4E-BP1 in LA4 cells infected with OPNWT/TM. (b) ELISA of OPN. LA-4cells were infectedwith OPN WT/TM and then treated with PMSF (0.5 mM), then, cultured media were collected and ELISA was performed. Each bar represents the mean±SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05 vs. Con ,+p < 0.05 vs. TM , #p < 0.05 vs WT and WT+PMSF. Con = non-treated cells; Vec = vector control; WT = OPN WT-infected cells; TM = OPN TM-infected cells

  6. Supplementary Figure 4 a b Supplementary Figure 4. Effectsof rapamycin and PDTC incells infected with OPN TM and OPN WT. (a) Dual luciferase assay. LA-4 cells were transfected with the bicistronic reporter construct pcDNAfLUC-polIRES-rLUC following infection with OPN lentiviralconstructs (vector only, OPN-WT, and OPN-TM) and then treated with rapamycin (100 nM)or left untreated. *p < 0.05 vs. Con , #p < 0.05 vs WT, $p<0.05 vs TM, +p <0.05 vs other treated group (b)Dual luciferase assay. LA-4 cells were transfected with the NF-κB luciferase vector andthe pRA-SV40 control vector following infection with OPNlentiviralconstructs (vector only, OPN-WT, and OPN-TM) and then treated with PDTCor left untreated.Each bar represents the mean±SEM(n = 3). *p < 0.05 vs. Con , #p < 0.05 vs WT, +p <0.05 vs other treated group. Con = non-treated cells; Vec = vector control; WT = OPN WT-infected cells; TM = OPN TM-infected cells

  7. Supplementary Figure 5 a b Supplementary Figure 5.Effects of lentivirus-mediated OPN TM and OPN WT on GALNAc-T1 and GALNAc-T2 expression level. (a) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of GALNAc-T1 in LA-4 cells infected with OPNWT/TM (b) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of GALNAc-T2 in LA-4 cells infected with OPNWT/TM. Each barrepresents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). CONTROL = non-treated cells; WT = OPN WT-infected cells; TM = OPN TM-infected cells

More Related