650 likes | 1.13k Views
Animal Welfare Act. Animal Law Summer 2013. 1969 . Cuyahoga river – NE Ohio (to Lake Erie). 1969 . cuyahoga river. today. today. February 4, 1966. 1966: Laboratory Animal Welfare Act. Discourage pet theft Humane standards for 6 research animals ( but not research standards) [
E N D
Animal Welfare Act Animal Law Summer 2013
1969 Cuyahoga river – NE Ohio (to Lake Erie)
1969 cuyahoga river
1966: Laboratory Animal Welfare Act • Discourage pet theft • Humane standards for 6 research animals (but not research standards) [ USDA Sec’y APHIS
1970: Animal Welfare Act Expanded the scope of : animals protected standards to regulate animal: any warm-blooded animal , as the Secretary may determine is being used, or is intended for use, for research, testing, experimentation, or exhibition purposes, or as a pet excluded farm animals; horses not used in research APHIS reg : no birds, rats, or mice
1976 amendments prohibit animal fighting (birds: state law-dependent) regulate commercial transportation other uses: hunting, breeding, security
1985: Improved Standards for Laboratory Animals Act standards for animals’ care in research, including: dogs (exercise) non-human primates (well-being)* In research: • pain management • consideration of alternatives 7 U.S.C. sec. 2143
amendments 1990: Food, Agric., Conservation & Trade Act injunctive relief and pet protection 2000: air travel protections
Definition of animal ALDF v. Madigan, 781 F. Supp. 797 (D.D.C. 1992) arbitrary and capricious definition ALDF v. Espy, 23 F. 3d 496 (1994) no standing to sue* *ALDF v. Glickman, 154 F. 3d 426 (1998) (en banc)
Definition of animal Alternatives Research & Dev. Found. v. Glickman, 101 F. Supp. 2d 7 (2000) victory! not so fast.... FY 2001, 2002 Appropriations bills
2002 amendments 1. bird fighting criminal prohibitions expanded 2. codified APHIS def. of animal
2007 amendment animal fighting: interstate commercial use of: 1. fighting instruments 2. “any instrumentality of . . . commercial speech for purposes of advertising an animal, or an instrument [as defined], for use in an animal fighting venture, promoting or . . . furthering an animal fighting venture” 7 U.S.C. 2156 Increased fines from $2500 to $10,000 per violation, per animal, per day
amendments 2013 (112th Cong) – add to def. of “exhibitor” an owner of a common, domesticated household pet who derives less than a substantial portion of income from a nonprimary source ([as per Sec’y]) for exhibiting an animal that exclusively resides at the residence of the pet owner in 7 U.S.C. 2132(h)
current bills (113th Congress) Animal Fighting Spectator Prohibition Act of 2013 (H.R. 366, S. 666) Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act(H.R. 847, S. 395) Pet Safety & Protection Act of 2013 (H.R. 2224)
TODAY: coverage • Animal fighting (criminal laws) • Breeders • Research • Entertainment • Animal Welfare Act sets federal baseline
TODAY: not an “animal” • lab rats and mice • cold-blooded vertebrates (fish, frogs) • invertebrates (fruit flies, worms) • animals used for food
Current AWA issues • Research (Chimpanzees) • Puppy Mills • Exotic Pets • Welfare of Animals in Sports, Entertainment • Litigation
No rats, mice, birds • IACUCs/Records/Validation of necessity • Records may be available under FOIA (PCRM) • Note: some agencies have higher standards • Includes cosmetics, consumer products, veterinary schools... • Contract Research Organizations
chimpanzees • National Institute of Health study
Total Number of Pets Ownedin the U.S. (millions) Bird 16.2 Cat 86.4 Dog 78.2 Equine 7.9 Freshwater Fish 151.1 Saltwater Fish 8.61 Reptile 13.0 Small Animal 16.0 TOTAL 377.41 (377,410,000) * APPA 2011-2012 National Pet Owners Survey
Regulation of dog breeders • exempt from AWA (sell directly to consumers) • internet • flea markets • Underfunded inspection/puppymills • State laws Oregon Humane Breeding Standards Penn. Puppy Mill law Arkansas, Alabama, New Jersey, Ohio (2013)
exotic pets • exotic animals: millions in U.S. (monkeys, chimps, big cats, bears) • Game Farms, Preserves • subject only to state animal cruelty laws (maybe) • Tony the Tiger • documentaries: • The Tiger Next Door • The Elephant in the Living Room • Project Nim
spectator & participation sports • Dog racing & Horse racing • Animal fighting • Horse shows: dressage, jumping • Polo • Rodeos • Donkeyball & other novelties • Canned hunting • Misc., i.e.: • Alligator wrestling • Swimming with dolphins
Dog racing tracks Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Rhode Island, Texas, West Virginia, Wisconsin
Dog Racing & the AWA • exhibitors under the AWA • But exempt under the regulations (9 CFR § 1.1) • laws: ID, ME, NC, NV, VT, VA, WA, NH, PA • ballot initiatives (not available in all states) 2008 Mass • Grey2K, HSUS, ASPCA: $500,000 • Mass. Animal Interest Coalition (racing org.) : $400,000
Horse Racing • exhibitors under the AWA • But exempt under the regulations (9 CFR § 1.1) • multi-billion dollar industry • estimated 800 deaths/year • UC Davis study: 1 in 6 injured in transport
Rodeos • exempt from exhibitor under AWA & regs • 24 states exempt rodeos from cruelty laws • many bans by county, city • outright or with limitations; requirements
"The rodeo folk send their animals to the packing house where...I have seen cattle so extensively bruised that the only areas where the skin was attached [to the body] was the head, neck, legs, and belly. I have seen animals with six to eight ribs broken from the spine and at times puncturing the lungs.” --C.J. Haber, veterinarian & 30-year USDA slaughterhouse meat inspector
canned hunting (live) • half states allow • ~1000 facilities in US • half in Texas • 1 in Vermont • chronic wasting disease dangers • HR 2210: The Sportsmanship in Hunting Act http://video.humanesociety.org/video/1010446395001/
AWA requirements of “exhibitors” Licensing & Recordkeeping General housing, handling, care is by animal
Circuses (large) • Exhibitors under AWA • Possible state animal cruelty actions • but no private cause of action • Endangered Species Act • private cause of action (“taking”) • standing a problem (both) • see ASPCA v. FELD
Zoos: AWA regs • whether for profit or not • minimal housing requirements • care & handling for “other warmblooded animals” 9 C.F.R. §§ 3.125 – 3.140 • Unprotected: fish, amphibians, reptiles • http://www.bornfree.org.uk/campaigns/zoo-check/
Zoos • ESA: exemption for zoo animals • MMPA: education or conservation purposes receive permit to own • CITES: • no trading of listed species for primarily commercial purposes • non-commercial: private, education, training, biomedical and science, captive breeding
Zoos • Self regulation (Assoc. of Zoos & Aquariums) • PETA v. U.S. Dept. of the Interior • Hagan v. Feld Entertainment
Animals in TV, Movies, Internet, Publishing • providers covered under, and exempted by, the AWA and ESA as are circuses • wild-born chimps: endangered • captive-bred chimps: threatened • this allows for U.S. trade in captive-bred chimps while forbidding importation of wild chimps • pets • research • entertainment • see Wagman presentation at 2008 L&C conference (link on TWEN)
other AWA exempted animals County Fairs • Animals as race contestants • i.e. pig races • Animals as prizes • i.e. goldfish in bag Animals in Parades Sports Mascots Animals in Sanctuaries (i.e. VINS) – educational exemption