1 / 17

Oscillation of Venus’ Upper Atmosphere*

Oscillation of Venus’ Upper Atmosphere*. Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309 USA Alex Konopliv Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA .

huy
Download Presentation

Oscillation of Venus’ Upper Atmosphere*

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Oscillation of Venus’ Upper Atmosphere* Jeffrey M. Forbes Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309 USA Alex Konopliv Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA A large (~±30-50%) density oscillation at a period near 9 days is discovered in Venus’ upper atmosphere (164-184 km; 11o N), based on radar tracking and precise orbit determination of the Magellan spacecraft between 15 September 1992 and 24 May 1993. *Geophysical Research Letters, in press, 2007 EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  2. Due to periodic (~7 days) adjustments in periapsis of Pioneer Venus Orbiter, analyses of these data for short-term cyclic variations is problematic Data Source: NASA NSSDC Master Catalog (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?ds=PSPA-00109). EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  3. Height and local time variations for Magellan occur over much greater time scales, and thus can be separated from much shorter-period variations local time height densities every orbit, or  3.2 h density EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  4. After removal of the height-local time trend, analysis of the residual densities reveals ~9-10 day-oscillation night day EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  5. Band-pass filtering around 9-10 day period Wave cut-off ~ 0200 LT Relative density oscillation during daytime is small “Confinement” EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  6. Why a 9-day period? • Why confinement to 1700-0200 LT? • Local time effect? • (source, dissipation, mean winds) • Temporal effect-- an “event”? • It is not possible to answer these questions with • the data at hand. • Some plausible options are considered. EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  7. zonal wavenumber longitude days • Within a 9-day period,  constant (slow rotation) • Doppler-shifting negligible, i.e., 9 days is “true” • wave period (at least for s = 0,1,2). • s is indeterminable s = 1  Equatorial zonal phase speed40 ms-1 (westward) If background U  60-100 ms-1 (westward),  Doppler-shifted phase speeds 20-60 ms-1 (eastward),  vertically-propagating Rossby wave with  30-60 km (Del Genio & Rossow, 1990) s = 0 also possible  zonally-symmetric oscillation Other zonal wavenumbers also mathematically possible EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  8. Periodicities in Venus’ atmosphere so far identified between the cloud tops (ca 65 km) and 80 km: •  4-day Kelvin wave* • 5-day Rossby wave* • 2.8-day wave** *(e.g., Del Genio and Rossow, 1982, 1990; Rossow et al., 1990) **(e.g., Del Genio and Rossow, 1982; Apt and Leung, 1982; Covey and Schubert, 1982) Why a 9-day periodicity? EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  9. Possible Sources of Excitation One Possibility Non-linear wave-wave interaction, yielding “sum and difference” secondary waves, similar to established examples in Earth’s atmosphere (e.g., Teitelbaum and Vial, 1991; Pancheva et al., 2000; Pogoreltsev et al., 2002) Possible source for 9-day wave (2.8d, s = 1) X (4.0d, s = 1) --> (1.6d, s = 2) + (9.3d, s = 0) Venus atmosphere GCM (Yamamoto and Tanaka, 1997) (4.0d, s = 1) X (5.7d, s = 1) --> (2.4d, s = 2) + (13.4d, s = 0) Other Possibilities Baroclinic instability or resonance EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  10. Day-night differences Source of Excitation Differing mean thermal and wind structures between day and night could affect the generation of waves arising from resonance or instability: This remains a possibility. Radiative Damping May be greater during the day when O/CO2 densities are higher. Molecular Dissipation: Density Scale Height (Day > Night) “Exponential growth” vs. “altitude at which growth ceases due to molecular dssipation”: tend to cancel. Rate of decrease of wave amplitude above the peak: Does favor higher amplitudes during night, but extent unknown due to dependence on vertical wavelength. height Wave amplitude However, none of these can address the “cutoff” near 0200 LT EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  11. Schematic of wind profiles in Venus’ Equatorial atmosphere and effects on vertical propagation of several waves Based on model simulations (Bougher et al., 1988) Critical level wave phase speed = background wind speed “smooth transition” between lower and upper atmosphere regimes Based on “available knowledge” Only the 9-day wave finds a “window” to Magellan altitudes (~1200 - 2400 LT), and with a cutoff near midnight EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  12. Conclusions • A large 9-day density oscillation existed in Venus’ • thermosphere during “cycle 4” of the Magellan mission • Its origin is unknown, but is plausibly excited by wave-wave • interactions • Its zonal wavenumber and propagation characteristics are • indeterminable from available data • Amplitude of the wave is much smaller during daytime • Cutoff of the wave after 0200 LT at night is plausibly explained by • mean wind filtering • Dissipation of the wave could significantly affect the zonal • mean circulation. • Venus Express may be able to further elucidate this wave, its • origins, propagation characteristics, and its role in the dynamics of • Venus’ atmosphere. EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  13. Additional slides EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  14. Night-time Data Densities after normalization to 170 km using Hedin Venus model 11-day running mean (red) 1-day averages of residuals from running mean, every 6 hours, in preparation for band-pass filtering EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  15. Daytime Data EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  16. Spectrum of Daytime Density Residuals EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

  17. Demonstration that periapsis motion of PVO contaminates densities and exosphere temperatures. Spectral analysis reveals 9-day periodicity here, but below the 95% confidence level. EGU General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria, 15 – 20 April 2007

More Related