1 / 20

Natural History of Sharks, Skates, and Rays Food & Feeding MARE 380 Dr. Turner

Natural History of Sharks, Skates, and Rays Food & Feeding MARE 380 Dr. Turner. Diet. Widely recognized that elasmobranchs play a role in energy transfer b/w upper trophic levels; understanding of how prey is consumed & processed is rudimentary. Quantifying Diet.

hwhiteside
Download Presentation

Natural History of Sharks, Skates, and Rays Food & Feeding MARE 380 Dr. Turner

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Natural History of Sharks, Skates, and Rays Food & Feeding MARE 380 Dr. Turner

  2. Diet Widely recognized that elasmobranchs play a role in energy transfer b/w upper trophic levels; understanding of how prey is consumed & processed is rudimentary

  3. Quantifying Diet Early descriptions – lists of prey items; counts, weight, or volume of stomach w/specific prey types Later index of relative importance (IRI) = %F(%W + %N) Energy budget of prey; convert items into calories or joules

  4. Dietary Groups 1° carnivores – limited array of prey compared to teleosts; Consume: plankton, teleosts, elasmobranchs, cephalopods, large fishes, reptiles, birds, marine mammals

  5. Diet Shifts That’s right! You fat cats didn’t finish your plankton; now it’s mine! – Chuck Gerebedian Fishing Down Marine Food Webs

  6. Feeding Relationships Relatively few investigations comparing diets of elasmobranchs Typically studies involving niche overlap among elsmo, competition w/ teleosts, among size classes of individual species

  7. Feeding Patterns Understanding feeding patterns requires knowledge of diet and dynamics of the feeding process, including ecological interactions b/w predator & prey Difficult; ↑ # of empty stomachs – no information

  8. Trophic Levels Assumed to be top predators Estimated with models – Ecopath Sharks- tertiary consumers (4th trophic level); similar to marine mammals, > birds Also estimates using 13C & 15N isotopes

  9. Stable Isotopes Carbon and nitrogen generally used (sulfur recently) - Both abundant throughout nature Values expressed as ratios of two isotopes - 13C/12C or 15N/14N = δ Can determine: primary producer (C&S) -Organic material has “isotopic signature” trophic level of feeding (N) Based upon principle of “Fractionation” Each time stable isotope is metabolized there is “Fractionation” (do not participate equally – bias toward lighter)

  10. Fractionation 12C 12C 12C C 13C 13C 13C -20 ‰ -19 ‰ -18 ‰ -17 ‰ Est. Value +1 ‰ +1 ‰ +1 ‰ 14N 14N 14N N 15N 15N 15N +10 ‰ +7 ‰ +13 ‰ +16 ‰ Est. Value +3 ‰ +3 ‰ +3 ‰

  11. 13C…origin of organic matter -8 -20 Fractionation of Carbon 1 ppt per Trophic level -9 -21 -10 -22 Phytoplankton Seagrass

  12. 15N…Trophic position of consumer Fractionation of Nitrogen 3-4 ppt Per Trophic level 18 tuna & dolphin = unknown 14 12 10 8 6 15 12 Juvenile fishes 15N Crustaceans 9 diatoms 6 -22 -20 -18 -16 13C

  13. Food Consumption Feeding ecology – important aspect of life-history – expressed as food consumption rates Consumption dep. upon gastric evacuation rates

  14. Daily Ration Mean amount of food consumed on a daily basis by individuals of a population – expressed as a proportion of mean body weight; measured: 1) in situ – field method; requires amt of food in stomach, gastric evacuation dynamics 2) bioenergetic models – estimated based upon bioenergetic equation: growth + metabolism + excretion + egestion

  15. Energy Budget Equation Consumption = growth + metabolism + excretion (urine, U) + egestion (feces, F) C = G + M + U + F Daily energy required for growth (J day-1) = growth (g day-1) X energy equiv of shark tissues (J g-1) Metabolism – MR X oxycalorific value Non-assimilated loss ≈ 27%

  16. Evacuation, Excretion, Egestion Limited information regarding gastric evacuation Excretion loses in gill effluent & urine not measured Egestion – spiral value; ↑ SA for digestion, ↓ volume to accommodate large liver

  17. Production Growth in body mass – measured via laboratory exper, field mark-recapture, size-at-age Expressed as % body weight ↑ in teleosts compared with elasmo Gross conversion efficiency (K1)

  18. Gross Conversion Efficiency Gross conversion efficiency (K1) – efficiency of food conversion to somatic growth; measures proportion of digested food available to next trophic level Typically from 3-40%; decrease with age Based upon Assimilation Efficiency- AE

  19. Summary – Food & Feeding Gastric Evacuation & Daily Ration

  20. Summary – Food & Feeding Elasmobranchs: Typically slow to process (digest) Slow growth – even in juveniles Might change with heterothermic pelagics - difference not seen in mako

More Related