580 likes | 685 Views
1981 to 2001 Trends Auckland “Region” Population, Migration, Industries and Occupational Mix. James Newell Monitoring and Evaluation Research Associates (MERA). Auckland Regional Council 19th August 2005. Introduction.
E N D
1981 to 2001 TrendsAuckland “Region” Population, Migration, Industries and Occupational Mix James Newell Monitoring and Evaluation Research Associates (MERA) Auckland Regional Council 19th August 2005
Introduction • Just completed 2 year programme of building detailed statistical description of changing nature of NZ and its communities • Moving on to end uses / added value applications of that work • Presentation Outline • Background • Population – changing demographic structure • Population change components • Migration • Industries – industry shift share analysis • Occupations – Occupational workforce dynamics and shift share analysis
Professional Interests and Background • 20 years plus working on development modelling and forecasting / independent social and economic research • Recent interests • Local and regional development modelling for service and infrqastructure planning (population, households, migration, land use, employment etc.) • Population projections and migration studies (2nd generation NZ regional migration, population accounting/vitals model version 2 just completed) • Operational forecasting (NZ Immigration Service operational forecasts, school roll projections etc.) • Labour market studies • Changing nature of work • Occupational workforce dynamics • Regional and rural development studies • Human educational capital and links to labour market
Auckland TA Region and New Zealand – 2001 Population Distribution by Age
Auckland TA Region– Population Distribution by Age 1981 to 2001
Auckland Region : Number of Births by Age of Mother 1991 to 2003
Annual FTE % Change – Selected Regional Comparisons : 1981-2001
Shift Share Analysis • Shift-Share Analysis following Dune (1960) • Where E represents employment • time is t, industry is i and region is j • NE represents National Employment Change Effect, • IM represents the Imdustry Mix Effect and • CE represents the Regional Competitive Effect.
Auckland Region : FTE Shift Share Trends Summary : Industry Level 2
Regional Competitive Effect per annum as % of Start Industry FTE
Regional Competitive Effect per annum as % of Start Industry FTE (12 highest growth rates)
Auckland Regional Competitive Effect (12 largest 1996-2001 effects in FTEs)
Auckland Regional Competitive Effect (13 lowest 1996-2001 effects in FTEs)
Industry Shift Share Case Study : Restaurants Cafes and Other Eating and Drinking Places
Regional Competitive Effect as % : Restaurants Cafes and Other Eating and Drinking Places
Auckland Region : FTE Shift Share Trends Summary : Occupation Lvl 5