1 / 7

GE-003-089

GE-003-089. Revision of GE Assessment Policy. History. EO 595 (now, 1033) mandates periodic assessment of GE Senate approved GE Assessment plan in 2004 (re: WASC 2003 visit) 16 committees, one for each area Each committee must have only current GE instructor representation

ian-fulton
Download Presentation

GE-003-089

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GE-003-089 Revision of GE Assessment Policy

  2. History • EO 595 (now, 1033) mandates periodic assessment of GE • Senate approved GE Assessment plan in 2004 (re: WASC 2003 visit) • 16 committees, one for each area • Each committee must have only current GE instructor representation • Timeline: three years • 4 areas yr 1; 8 yr. 2; synthesis yr. 3

  3. Status • As of Nov 19, 2008, four committees have completed plans • Three of these committees have conducted assessments • Six committees have developed outcomes only • Two committees are still considering outcomes; four have never met

  4. This Referral: • Decommission present GE Assessment committees, but keep the work • Create new Academic Senate, ad hoc GE Assessment Committee, separate from present standing GE Committee

  5. Why This Referral Now • EO 1033 mandates development of learning outcomes for GE • WASC is expecting that GE Assessment plan is implemented • It is the right thing to do; it will help student learning

  6. Advantages to New Structure • One committee instead of 16 • Committee does not have to reinvent wheel for each area; work can be consolidated • Administratively, easier to support one committee than 16 • Committee staffing consistency and ease • Can use existing data: GWT exams, capstone projects, etc.

  7. Committee Composition • One faculty rep from each college (8) • One from ASI (1) • One from Undergrad studies (1) Support from: Undergraduate Studies, Institutional Research Assessment and Planning, & Faculty Center for Professional Development

More Related