1 / 18

Changes in Race and Hispanic Distributions within California, 2000 - 2010

Changes in Race and Hispanic Distributions within California, 2000 - 2010. James P. Allen and Eugene Turner California State University, Northridge. Photo by Greg Russell. Percent Change in California Population by Decade. 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0. Percent Change between Decades.

ida
Download Presentation

Changes in Race and Hispanic Distributions within California, 2000 - 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Changes in Race and Hispanic Distributions within California, 2000 - 2010 James P. Allen and Eugene Turner California State University, Northridge Photo by Greg Russell

  2. Percent Change in California Population by Decade 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Percent Change between Decades Other West California United States 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Source: U.S. Census Bureau

  3. Components of Annual California Population Change, 2000 - 2010 • 400,000 • 300,000 • 200,000 • 100,000 • 0 • 100,000 • - 200,000 Natural Increase Net Immigration Annual Population Change Net Domestic Migration 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Ending Year Source: California Department of Finance

  4. Method of Mapping Change with Colored Dots Turner, Eugene and James P. Allen. Issues in Depicting Population Change with Dot Maps Cartography and Geographic Information Scence, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2010. Pp 189-197.

  5. Major Race and Ethnic Groups in California, 2010 Population Percent Change 2010 2000 - 2010 NonHispanic Whites 14,956,253- 5.4 Hispanics (Latinos)14,013,71927.8 Asians4,861,00731.5 Black (African-American)2,227,0721.6 American Indians362,8018.8 Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders128,57723.9 NonHispanic population reporting two or more races 968,696 7.3 Total California population37,253,95610.0

  6. Asians Lowest Pct. Growth Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. San Benito 13.0 1,443 San Francisco 11.8 267,915 Yuba 7.6 4,862 Monterey 4.2 25,258 Imperial 0.2 2,843 Highest Pct. Growth Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. Placer 179.3 20,435 Napa 149.7 9,223 Riverside 129.1 130,468 El Dorado 89.2 6,297 Madera 78.9 2,802 Asian Change Percent Asian Change 1,163,494 31.5

  7. Blacks Highest Pct. Growth Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. Placer 133.9 4,751 El Dorado 73.3 1,409 Napa 62.2 2,668 Yolo 52.1 5,208 Riverside 45.8 140,543 Highest Pct. Decline Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. Los Angeles - 8.0 856,874 Alameda - 11.7 190,451 Monterey - 15.0 12,785 San Mateo - 17.7 20,436 San Francisco - 19.2 48,870 Black Change Percent Black Change 35,190 1.6

  8. Hispanics Lowest Pct. Growth Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. Santa Clara 18.8 75,809 San Mateo 18.0 27,794 Orange 15.7 137,394 San Francisco 11.2 12,270 Los Angeles 10.5 445,676 Highest Pct. Growth Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. Placer 86.1 44,710 Riverside 77.9 995,257 Yuba 72.8 18,051 Calaveras 70.1 4,703 Lake 67.0 11,088 Hispanic Change Percent Hispanic Change 3,047,163 27.8

  9. Whites Highest Pct. Growth Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. Placer 28.0 265,294 Riverside 10.2 869,068 El Dorado 9.0 144,689 Yuba 7.9 42,416 Calaveras 7.4 38,074 Highest Pct. Decline Counties County Pct. Chg. 2010 Pop. San Benito - 13.7 21,154 San Mateo - 13.8 303,609 Santa Clara - 15.8 626,909 Monterey - 15.8 136,435 Imperial - 16.8 23,927 NH White Change Percent NH White Change - 860,537 - 5.4

  10. Conclusions Asians and Hispanics are increasing most rapidly in the state; only NonHispanic Whites are decreasing 2. Whites are decreasing in most parts of the Bay area and in the more coastal sections of Southern California.

  11. Conclusions 3. Blacks are decreasing in Los Angeles County and the more populous counties of the Bay area. 4. Most specific CCDs that are growing rapidly appear to be new residential developments on former farm lands.

  12. Conclusions 5. All groups are expanding most into interior parts of the state, especially in Riverside County and the Central Valley. Growth has been especially strong in the broad zone between the Bay Area and Sacramento and Stockton and in nearby counties that extend into the Sierra Nevada.

More Related