1 / 23

Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center

Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center. PURPOSE & OUTCOME.

ignatius-mcleod
Download Presentation

Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center

  2. PURPOSE & OUTCOME Professional Service Providers will be introduced to systemic tools to guide and facilitate school improvement strategies through the job embedded professional development for district and campus leaders of low-performing schools.

  3. District Capacity and Will to Support Turnaround Effort

  4. EXPECTATIONS • The Role of the Principal and • their Leadership Team: • Assistant Principals • Academic Dean/Instructional Coaches • Counselors • Teachers • Teacher Assistants • Page 4: A Leader’s Guide for Tx Turnaround Implementation

  5. Page 8: A Leader’s Guide for Tx Turnaround Implementation

  6. REQUIRED DOCUMENTS The focused data analysis (FDA) with student level review (SLR) assists campuses and PSPs in a data analysis process that supports appropriate goal setting and school improvement planning. Results from these analyses will be considerations for the on-site needs assessment and development of the School Improvement Plan (SIP).

  7. Focused Data Analysis &Needs Assessment Review • Principal & Campus Leadership Teams: • Identify students based on the following criteria • Students with 18+ or more absences • Students with 5+ removals due to discipline • Students not meeting standards on academics in core • Identify teacher effectiveness using the Teacher Demographic Data • Identify trends for high expectations, safety using the Climate Survey Data

  8. STUDENT INTERVENTIONS

  9. CAUSAL FACTORS School Improvement Plan Strategy • Impacting Factor • Possible Impacting Factor • Not an Impacting Factor

  10. SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN • Site Based Decision Making • Board Approval • Submit to TEA • WHAT NEXT?

  11. DISTRICT LEADERS How can each department align their work and services to support the implementation of the School Improvement Plan? Pages 16-23 : A Leader’s Guide for Texas Turnaround Implementation

  12. WEEKLY CAMPUS SUPPORT • Lesson Plan Development • Supervising Instruction • Progress Monitoring

  13. Attendance, Behavior & Academic Interventions

  14. Attendance Reflect how attendance impacts academic achievement

  15. Behavior How does behavior impact academic achievement?

  16. eCST Service Tracking and Intervention Usage by AU Middle School Campus (2011-2012 SY) Note. Campus enrollment as of end of SY 2011-2012. Source. eCST Application, AISD Department of Learning Support Services.

  17. INTERVENTIONS • Effective • Highly Effective • Not Effective

  18. Engagement Rigor Quality Interactions

  19. EVIDENCE OF IMPACT Page 53-56: A Leader’s Guide for Texas Turnaround Implementation

  20. QUESTIONS?

  21. Contact Information: Debbie C. Hester, Austin ISD Debra.Hester@austinisd.org

More Related