1 / 35

Prospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome: Influence on Surgical Professional Development

Professor MJ Underwood Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong. Prospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome: Influence on Surgical Professional Development. Questions. What is Professional Development ?

ila-pate
Download Presentation

Prospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome: Influence on Surgical Professional Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Professor MJ Underwood Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Prospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome: Influence on Surgical Professional Development

  2. Questions • What is Professional Development ? • How does it relate to Clinical Outcomes ? • How does it relate to a National Database?

  3. Personal Viewpoint • UK System • Hong Kong Initiatives

  4. Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

  5. Continuing Professional Development (CPD)

  6. Interrelates • Clinical • Managerial • Professional PROVISION OF HIGH-QUALITY PATIENT CARE

  7. Interrelates • Clinical • Managerial • Professional PROVISION OF HIGH-QUALITY PATIENT CARE

  8. General Medical Council Guidance - 2006

  9. High Quality Patient Care = Quality Assurance Programme in Cardiac Surgery • AIM : • Provide ‘safest’ journey for the patient during their hospital stay with ‘acceptable’ outcome defined by international standards.

  10. Quality Assurance Components

  11. Practical Factors Local Data Collection Internal/External Validation National Data Collection Internal/External Validation Data Confidentiality/Safeguards International Data Comparison Calibration, Comparison Personal/Surgical Factors Commitment Culture Consistent ESSENTIAL: Quality Assurance Components

  12. CPD=High Quality Care=Quality Assurance=Data Collection =Data Analysis • How do we collect data ? • How do we analyze data ?

  13. DATA COLLECTION: Surgical Perspectives • Accurate • Validated • Internal/External • Available for Analysis • ‘real-time’ for risk monitoring • Internationally Compatible • Security

  14. Data Collection: Summary ‘Validated’

  15. Influencing Events • 1994-96 Senior Registrar Bristol Royal Infirmary • 1997Fontan Scholarship Brussels • 1999-2002Consultant/Senior Lecturer Bristol Heart Institute 1995 External Review 1998 GMC Enquiry 2001 Public Enquiry

  16. Senior Lecturer/Consultant (1999-On) • Audit Lead Cardiac Services • Clinical Governance Lead • R and D Quality Assurance Lead • Consolidating Data Collection and Reporting • Contribution to CEPOD • Public Presentation of Results • External Validation of BRI Data Collection • Development of Sub-Specialist Databases

  17. Saturday 27 June 1998 BMJ All changed, changed utterly British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case Richard smith, Editor

  18. Continuous Professional Development: Institutional Reporting

  19. Continuous Professional Development: Individual Reporting

  20. Prospective Analysis of Clinical Outcome: Where are we in Hong Kong ? • Institution of Computerized Data Collection and Analysis System • Automated demographic data • Data Input at ‘point of clinical care’ • Dedicated Database Manager • Accuracy, validation processes

  21. Automated Demographics and Risk Calculation

  22. Direct Comparison of Risk Scoring Systems: Testing • Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves • Area represents probability that risk predictor accurately discriminates between death and survival • Area of 1 = Perfect • Closer to 1 better, Closer to 0.5 less accurate • Calibration Plots • Plot observed vs expected events in calibration plot • Chi-squared value used as measure of accuracy of matching

  23. Risk-Scoring in the UK Population

  24. Validation of Euroscore in Hong Kong ROC Area 0.819: modified Euroscore ROC Area 0.823: logistic Euroscore

  25. Influence of Risk-Stratified Data Analysis on Professional Development. • Monitor actual mortality and morbidity vs predicted • Essential for Quality Assurance Progamme • Compare with International Data

  26. Comparison of Risk-Profiles: East vs West ! • But: • Does risk-validation hold for sub-groups ? • Is there a need for ‘population specific’ risk assessment

  27. Hong Kong Cardiac Database: Overview

  28. A National Database :Unique Practical Challenges from a Surgeon • Differing data collection mechanisms • How merge ? • Accuracy and validity • What infrastructure ? • Security • Who see’s the data ? • Data Analysis • Who analyses the data? • Presentation and Publication • Who ?

  29. Hong Kong Cardiac Database: Overview Chinese Cardiac Surgical Database

  30. Professional Development/Clinical Outcome/National Database: Summary • Inter-related • inseparable • Inevitable • ‘consumer’/provider driven • Irreversible • USA, UK, Europe

  31. BMJ 2005;330: (5 March) • Editor's choice • Individual performance data: revelation and revolution • Welcome to a new world. Be brave. • Kamran Abbasi, acting editor

More Related