180 likes | 278 Views
Turn down the noise: Temporal modification of songbird singing behavior in the presence of punctuated noise events. Emily Finch Department of Biology Calvin College. Hypothesis and Prediction.
E N D
Turn down the noise: Temporal modification of songbird singing behavior in the presence of punctuated noise events Emily Finch Department of Biology Calvin College
Hypothesis and Prediction • If temporal modification is an important adaptation for persistence in anthropogenic noise, we predict that songbirds will sing more often and with greater regularity during quiet periods of time embedded within experimentally elevated noise than during similar times intervals under control (non-noise) conditions.
Objectives • Determine the effects of road noise on bird singing patterns • Possibility of adaptation • Determine if songbirds will adapt to sing more in quiet gaps • Modify behavior to sing more frequently during 1 and 5 minute gaps in noise compared to equivalent gaps in quiet conditions • Or delay vocalization until post-playback conditions
Methods • 6 weeks of data collection
Methods • 6 weeks of data collection • 2 experimental sites and 2 control sites per week
Methods • 6 weeks of data collection • 2 experimental sites and 2 control sites per week • Focus on forest/forest edge species
Methods • 6 weeks of data collection • 2 experimental sites and 2 control sites per week • Focus on forest/forest edge species • 3 to 4 days of experiment per week • Possibility of acclimation
Methods • 6 weeks of data collection • 2 experimental sites and 2 control sites per week • Focus on forest/forest edge species • 3 to 4 days of experiment per week • Each site 350+ meters apart
Site layout 25 meters Passive recorder Speaker ~50 meters Control has passive recorder, but no playback setup
Noise Playback 10 min post 10 min pre 5 min 1 min Ramp
Daily Procedure • Point counts • System Test • Enter point counts • Analyze recordings, focus on the gaps • 10 minutes • Top 20 forest species • Note distance • Check the unknown species • Purpose
Daily Procedure • Point counts • System Test • Enter point counts • Analyze recordings, focus on the gaps • Run sound playback and check speakers • Change out the battery
Daily Procedure • Point counts • System Test • Enter point counts • Analyze recordings, focus on the gaps • Species and distance • Other factors: wind, temperature, clouds, time
Daily Procedure • Point counts • System Test • Enter point counts • Analyze recordings, focus on the gaps • Cut gaps • Count number of songs per species
Calculating the Results • Finish data collection (1 week remaining) • Count all 1 and 5 minute gaps and 10 minute post-playback
Calculating the Results • Finish data collection (1 week remaining) • Count all 1 and 5 minute gaps and 10 minute post-playback Then… • Choose focal species • In the lead: REVI, AMRO, EAWP, TUTI, ACFL, COYE • Compare 1 and 5 minute gaps in control and experimental conditions • Calculate song rate in 10 minute post playback
Possible Outcomes • Birds sing more in silent windows during noise playback than during equivalent gaps under control conditions • Birds vocalize less in noisy conditions than in quiet conditions • Under noisy conditions, birds will leave the area • As time progresses, bird singing patterns change indicating that they are able to or not able to adjust to noisy conditions
Conclusion • The information gathered from this study can help influence road construction. • Bird adaptability can be used in conservation efforts when planning roadways