1 / 33

Fort Bend ISD Facilities Plan: Planning Area B Community Dialogue #2 December 3,4 & 5, 2013

Fort Bend ISD Facilities Plan: Planning Area B Community Dialogue #2 December 3,4 & 5, 2013. Purpose. Data. Options. Key Dates. Purpose. Purpose of tonight’s meeting: To review proposed options; Provide written input of your opinion of the options provided;

ima
Download Presentation

Fort Bend ISD Facilities Plan: Planning Area B Community Dialogue #2 December 3,4 & 5, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fort Bend ISD Facilities Plan: Planning Area B Community Dialogue #2 December 3,4 & 5, 2013

  2. Purpose Data Options Key Dates

  3. Purpose Purpose of tonight’s meeting: To review proposed options; Provide written input of your opinion of the options provided; Provide suggestions of ways to improve the options provided; Provide new ideas for options IMPORTANT to remember: These are just options, no recommendations have been made; Options Do NOT suggest timelines or order of projects; Other options will be considered, if they consider the impact on not just an individual school, but how that option effects others Options that turn into recommendations will first consider the students and what will have the least amount of impact to their educational process

  4. Planning Area B

  5. Data • Enrollment/Utilization & Condition: *Permanent Capacity Only

  6. Planning Area B: Data

  7. Planning Area B: Data

  8. Planning Area B: Data

  9. Planning Area B: Data

  10. Facility Data Planning Area A

  11. Live/Attend Analysis

  12. Options Packet Current/Projected Data Option Description Option Data Description

  13. School within a School Concept • Concept: • Smaller Schools that share site and/or spaces • Create Flexibility of Delivery (time, grade configuration, etc...) • Allow for more capacity without feeling like student is in a large school • Shared Resources

  14. B.E.1—Barrington Place, Meadows, Townewest • Facility Issues • Townewest is over-utilized • Meadows & Townewest have high FCIs relative to other FBISD facilities

  15. B.E.1—Barrington Place, Meadows, Townewest Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment into existing facilities. + low cost - Townewest remains over-utilized • Option 2 • Rebuild Townewest at capacity larger than the current capacity to the District prototype of 850 students. + Relieves over-crowding - Higher capital investment - Swing space during construction

  16. B.E.2—Austin Parkway, Commonwealth, Settlers Way • Facility Issues • Commonwealth is over-utilized • Austin Parkway & Commonwealth have high FCIs relative to other FBISD facilities • Colony Meadows (B.E.3.) is over-utilized and can be provided relief from Commonwealth once New ES is built in Riverstone

  17. B.E.2—Austin Parkway, Commonwealth, Settlers Way Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investments into existing schools • Renovations at Austin Parkway & Commonwealth • Build 1,200 Capacity ES at Riverstone site • Relieve utilization at Commonwealth with Rezone to new ES • Possible (TBD) relief for Colony Meadows into Commonwealth + reduces area over-crowding - Rezoning required - Shared School Site may be a new concept to the Community - Site logistics - Commonwealth ES may not be relieved enough to handle future relief for other elementary schools • Option 2 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Renovations at Austin Parkway & Commonwealth • Build New ES at Riverstone site (850 prototype) • Relieve utilization at Commonwealth with rezone to new ES at Riverstone + reduces area over-crowding - Rezoning required - Does not provide relief to Settlers Way ES - May not provide enough seats for the long-term

  18. B.E.3—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows • Facility Issues • Colony Meadows is over-utilized and will be more over-utilized with addition of new apartments currently being built by boundary • Colony Bend has approximately 225 students that transfer into the boundary.

  19. B.E.3 (1/2)—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Relief for Colony Meadows by rezoning to other area schools + reduces area over-crowding +can provide a more consistent feeder pattern for this area - Rezoning required - Area remains at/near capacity - Determining which school will provide best option for rezoning • Option 2 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • In anticipation of new apartments currently being developed near Costco, rezone to an area elementary that can accommodate an additional approx. 100 students + reduces area over-crowding - Finding location for Pre-K program - Area remains at/near capacity - Does not provide for feeder pattern consistency

  20. B.E.3 (1/2)—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows Strengths & Challenges • Option 3 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Rezone apartments at Lexington & Austin into Colony Bend boundary + reduces utilization at Colony Meadows + keeps students in current feeder pattern - Rezoning required - Transfer students at Colony Bend ES - Creating boundary change with least impact on current students • Option 4 • Combination of the Above Options + reduces area over-crowding - Rezoning required - Area remains at/near capacity

  21. B.E.4—Lantern Lane, Palmer, Quail Valley • Facility Issues • Anticipated increased utilization at Lantern Lane ES with the current construction of apartments in the boundary

  22. B.E.4—Lantern Lane, Palmer, Quail Valley Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • 10 classroom addition to Lantern Lane + will accommodate growth - Additional capital investment

  23. B.E.5—Drabek, Lakeview, Sugar Mill • Facility Issues • Drabek and Sugar Mill over-utilized • Lakeview is a historic facility

  24. B.E.5—Drabek, Lakeview, Sugar Mill Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Selective Replacement, Historic Renovations and Additions to Lakeview • Rezone Sugar Mill to Lakeview • Rezone Drabek to New Townewest (B.E.1) + Reduces over-crowding at Drabek and Sugar Mill - Rezoning required - Leaves area at capacity • Option 2 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Selective Replacement, Historic Renovations and Additions to Lakeview • Build 4 CR Addition to Sugar Mill + Reduces over-crowding at Sugar Mill - Does not provide relief for Drabek

  25. B.E.6—Dulles, Highlands, Lexington Creek • Facility Issues • Dulles ES is a relatively old facility in FBISD

  26. B.E.6—Dulles, Highlands, Lexington Creek Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Renovations to Dulles, Highlands, & Lexington Creek + Updates current facilities

  27. B.M.1—Dulles, First Colony, Fort Settlement, Quail Valley, Sugar Land • Facility Issues • First Colony MS is overcrowded

  28. B.M.1—Dulles, First Colony, Fort Settlement, Quail Valley, Sugar Land Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Addition at First Colony MS + Reduces over-crowding • Option 2 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Rezone area middle schools • Repurpose Lake Olympia Facility for Transportation & Service Center + Cleans feeder into Ridge Point HS + Reduces operational costs - Repurposing Lake Olympia - Rezoning

  29. B.H.1—Clements, Elkins, Kempner • Facility Issues • Enrollment at Elkins HS is projected to increase due to population growth in the Riverstone subdivision • Current Clements 9-12th grade live-in is: 1,968 • Current Clements 7-10th grade live-in is 1,807

  30. B.H.1—Clements, Elkins, Kempner Strengths & Challenges • Option 1 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Monitor Clements Live-in Enrollment • Consider moving World Languages Academywhen neighborhood population approaches capacity of the facility + Renovates current facilities - Possible movement of a program to another high school facility in time • Option 2 • Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment • Rezone Cornerstone ES feeder into Austin HS to relieve future utilization at Kempner HS + See packet A.H.1 - See packet A.H.1

  31. Questionnaire Individual Questionnaire For each option- Evaluate Independently Select (when applicable) your preferred option If you have a suggested option that is not listed please explain in space provided Group Questionnaire: Goal is to reach consensus- may not occur Table facilitator will record group responses Please allow all to contribute to the conversation

  32. Process Timeline Update Key Meeting Dates: December 4th & 5th- 2nd Community Dialogues December 16th- Board of Trustees Work Session December 17th/18th- Recommendations work sessions January- Steering Committee Recommendations Meetings January – Board of Trustees Workshop (TBD) February - Facility Plan Deliverable

  33. Questionnaire ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE OPTION

More Related