130 likes | 265 Views
LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF PRIVATE ARMED GUARDS Hellenic Mediterranean Panel 29 th March 2012. Michele White General Counsel, INTERTANKO. Overview. Armed guards a commercial necessity or slippery slope? - 2009 – 117 attacks ; 46 successful hijacks – 39%
E N D
LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF PRIVATE ARMED GUARDSHellenic Mediterranean Panel 29th March 2012 Michele White General Counsel, INTERTANKO
Overview Armed guards a commercial necessity or slippery slope? • - 2009 – 117 attacks ; 46 successful hijacks – 39% • - 2011 – 151 attacks ; 25 successful hijacks – 17% • - 2012 – attacks up; success rate down again • - BMP and military intervention insufficient • - Wider use of private armed guards • - No ship with PAGs successfully hijacked • - Financial cost – in 2011 - USD 500 million? • - Who do you trust? Standards? - --Regulation/Accreditation? • - Standard contracts – GUARDCON?
Use of Armed Guards • Who are the PMSCs? • Private companies • Private individuals – ex military (Royal Marines; US Navy Seals; Yemeni coastguard?) • Governed by national not international laws • Not military • Not police • BUT – they may use lethal force
Do you need Armed Guards? • Risk Assessment • Current threat levels (MSCHOA, UKMTO, IMB, INTERTANKO Security Alerts) • Ship’s proposed route • Ship’s vulnerability – size, freeboard, manoeuvrability, BMP measures • Ship’s cargo • Risk of use of armed guards – misuse firearms, liability, escalation, compliance with national and international laws
What to look for? • Checklist • General • PMSC Background Information • Selection and Vetting of individuals • Training the team • Insurance cover for the PMSC • Size, Composition of the PCASP Team and their Equipment • Command and Control of Onboard Security Team • Management of Firearms and Ammunition from Embarkation to Disembarkation • Rules on the Use of Force • Reporting and Record Keeping • Familiarisation for Master and the crew
Use of Force • Are PMSC’s allowed : • To carry weapons? • To repel a piracy attack • To seize, arrest, detain and handover • To actively interdict pirates • Duty to render assistance • Relationship with the Master • Jurisdiction?
Carriage of Firearms • Mainly National/Domestic Laws • Law of the Flag of the ship • Port/coastal state • Types of solution • Regulations on embarkation/disembarkation • Licensing individuals or particular type of weapon • Export/end user licences • Soft law • IMO Guidelines • National guidelines • Industry guidelines
Repelling an attack? • Private armed guards can use force to: • Defend from an attack • Includes right to self defence/defence of others • May include use of lethal force in extreme • Private armed guards may not: • Delay, disrupt or seize a pirate ship • Governed by: • Domestic criminal law • Soft laws on PMSCs
Seize, arrest, detain, interdict? • Seizure on account of piracy • Warships/government ships only • Arrest, detain, handover? • SUA Convention • Interdict pirates • Warships/government ships only
Duty to Render Assistance? • Treaty obligations including: • International Convention on Search and Rescue • International Convention on Safety of life at Sea (SOLAS) • Duty of ships with PMSCS to render assistance to: • Other merchant vessels in distress • Alleged pirates in distress • BUT • not absolute obligation • assess danger to ship, crew and passengers
The Master and the PMSC • Who decides on use of force? • The master? • PMSC? • Considerations • Master ultimate responsibility for safety • Individual’s right to self defence • Expertise of PMSC • Contractual clauses
Jurisdiction - What if….? • Greek Flag Vessel • UK PSC and armed guards • Exchange of fire • Somali pirate killed • Ukrainian crew injured • Pollution incident • High seas? Territorial Waters? • Who decides?