1 / 12

ASB/20 – ANSP view on the future of FABEC on 4 key questions

ASB/20 – ANSP view on the future of FABEC on 4 key questions. DFS view. ATM services according to SES definitions. Airspace Management. Air Navigation Services*. Air Traffic Flow Management. Air Traffic Services. Supporting Services. Communication Services. Area Control Service**.

imelda
Download Presentation

ASB/20 – ANSP view on the future of FABEC on 4 key questions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASB/20 – ANSP view on the future of FABEC on 4 key questions DFS view

  2. ATM services according to SES definitions Airspace Management Air Navigation Services* Air Traffic Flow Management Air Traffic Services Supporting Services Communication Services Area Control Service** Navigation Services Approach Control Service** Surveillance Services Aerodrome Control Service** Aeronautical Information Services Meteorological Services** * regulated, to be certified ** also to be designated

  3. FABEC ANSP performance goals for 2018 • Despite traffic growth safety remains stable • Capacity for app. 50% more traffic and delay per flight at max. 1 minute • Reduction of the real unit costs by 17% • Reduction of flight extension by 2 km per year until 2010 and accumulated to 10 KM by 2018, leading to • A reduction of the impact on environment

  4. Co-operations as enabler to increase performance Growing ANSP Cooperation Merger Joint venture Contractual cooperation (Single ANSP ?) (e.g. Border Triangle, FABEC training entity) Coordination (e.g. MoU between DFS and LVNL) (e.g. new airspace design between Amsterdam, Maastricht UAC’s Ruhr Sector and Frankfurt (AMRUFRA)) Information Exchange (e.g. joint international representation)

  5. FABEC partners start from different positions … today State 1 State 2 State 3 ANSP 1 ANSP 2 ANSP 3 • Enroute • Approach • Aerodrome • Training • CNS • AIM • Enroute • Approach • Aerodrome • Training • CNS • AIM • Enroute • Approach • Training • CNS • AIM • Commercial business • Subsidiaries • Aerodrome • Subsidiaries • Civil military co-operation (integration vs. co-location vs. separate military ANSP) • Legal form (public authority vs. corporatised organisation) • Funding • Competitive elements in certain services

  6. ... with the consolidation of relevant services in joint ventures future State 1 State 2 State 3 ANSP 1 ANSP 2 ANSP 3 • Commercial business • Aerodrome services • Overseas OPS FABEC Management / Shared Services FABEC enroute north FABEC enroute south (Border Triangle) FABEC Joint Ventures FABEC Training FABEC CNS FABEC AIM National ANSPs own the FABEC Joint Ventures.

  7. Flight Calibration Services GmbH GroupEAD Europe S.L. European Satellite Services Provider SAS ANSP view from a DFS perspective 100% DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH 55% 100% 36% 100% 16,67% DFS-Unterstützungs-kasse GmbH The Tower Company GmbH A % B % C % D% Border Triangle private legal entity Other FABEC Joint Venture Other FABEC Joint Ventures FABEC Management private legal entity Other FABEC joint ventures

  8. Back up

  9. 1. What parts of today’s ANSPs business should merge into a FABEC entity / single ANSP? (1/3) • Only those parts of today’s ANSPs are consolidated leading to an increased FABEC performance. • These parts are pooled service by service in separate corporate entities • According to specific needs, staff and asset transfers are considered • Corporate / administrative functions may be provided by one Joint FABEC Management/ Shared Services Entity

  10. 2. Who will be the owner of a FABEC entity / the single ANSP? • FABEC will very likely evolve over time via different Joint Ventures that may end up in a single service provider • Today’s ANSPs are the owners of these FABEC Joint Ventures.

  11. 3. What principles should be applied for the governance ? • Regulatory governance is exercised by the states  FABEC Council • Corporate governance is exercised by the ANSPs  FABEC Joint Ventures • Company law directives by the states are also exercised by the Supervisory boards and/or shareholders

  12. 4. How should the transition towards a FABEC entity / the single ANSP be designed (roadmap)? • Create a FABEC Management private legal entity • Start case by case (i.e. service by service), e.g. Border Triangle Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre, Training entity, joint AIM provision • Allow different speeds • Follow a modular and flexible approach • Keep models open and scaleable for later joiners and additional partners • …

More Related