130 likes | 253 Views
Rhetorical Audiences for Wikis. Adapted from work by Toby F. Coley And Andrew O’Baoill. Wikis and the Rhetorical Audience---Fluid and Dynamic, Multifacited . Single Audience Limited Audience Undefined Audience Fictionalized Audience Addressed Audience Invoked Audience.
E N D
Rhetorical Audiences for Wikis Adapted from work by Toby F. Coley And Andrew O’Baoill
Wikis and the Rhetorical Audience---Fluid and Dynamic, Multifacited • Single Audience • Limited Audience • Undefined Audience • Fictionalized Audience • Addressed Audience • Invoked Audience
Single Audience—Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca • Teacher/grader figure • Author/Authority figure—wiki member with more expertise whose words carry more weight • Self/Author figure – also referred to as “universal audience” by Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca. Enacts the greatest influence on individual author
Limited Audience—Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca • Wiki community • Academic community • Class members • Wider academic community
Undefined Audience—Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca • World or cyber audiences • May represent the “imagined audience”
Fictional Audience—Walter Ong • Constructed by Writer • Based on past fictionalizations of previous audiences for previous authors (genre considerations) • Wiki author knows what audience/authors need to continue wiki conversation
Audience Addressed--Ede and Lunsford • Rhetoric’s traditional concept of “real life audience” • Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle Ethos Pathos Logos
Audience Invoked-Ede and Lunsford • Similar to the fictionalized audience of Walter Ong
Building Rhetorical Knowledge on a Wiki • Consensus through Difference—Trimble • Produces socially constructed knowledge • Wikipedia’s NPOV (Neutral Point of View)
Habermas’ Public Sphere & BlogsO’Baoill • Inclusivity of Access--open to all • A list bloggers • Digital divide • Time commitment • Financial resources
Habermas’ Public Sphere & BlogsO’Baoill • Disregard for Rank—all participants considered equal • A list bloggers • Personal networks • Problem of Google ranking
Habermas’ Public Sphere & BlogsO’Baoill • Rational Debate to build Consensus • Concentration on superficial issues • Derivative of stories from main stream news • Ignores the local • Write too often about blogosphere • Popular themes dominate; limited topics discussed • With RSS feeds, less opportunity for interaction
Blogs Inclusivity of Access--open to all Disregard for Rank—all participants considered equal Rational Debate to build Consensus-- Wikis Habermas’ Public SphereWikis vs. Blogs