1 / 13

Formats used by the Managing Authorities to publish information on beneficiaries of

Explore the findings of the study on beneficiary list maintenance, time spent, data comparability, and technical approaches. Recommendations include downloadable, searchable, and standardized data. Join the discussion on regionetwork2020.eu.

imogeneb
Download Presentation

Formats used by the Managing Authorities to publish information on beneficiaries of

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. List of Beneficiaries study prepared by TechnopolisMain findingsEstimated time spent on publishing the beneficiary list

  2. Do you consider the amount of time and resources required for data maintenance on beneficiary and project information to be?

  3. Formats used by the Managing Authorities to publishinformation on beneficiaries:(n=50, multiple choices)

  4. Formats used by the Managing Authorities to publishinformation on beneficiaries of ETC programmes

  5. Frequency of the update of LoB information

  6. Types of processes used to publish data • Figure 8 Process to publish beneficiary list

  7. Importance of data comparability

  8. MA compare rather within the MS

  9. Only 42% (28% for ETC) of programmes collect any user feedback on the List of Beneficiaries22% (11) of the programmes have information in a foreign language

  10. Technical approaches • National vs regional databases(sometimes 2 databases exist) • Basic IT solutions: MS Excel/Access / Manual processes • Intermediate IT solutions: My SQL databases, (e.g. SI; Vienna) / semi-automated processes (e.g.: data extracted data from db ->PDF) • Advanced IT solutions: e.g. Oracle-based (i.a. DK, HU, PL), IBM cognos (CZ) or Presage (FR) -> Fully automated processes: these are very efficient and powerful but costly to implement

  11. List of Beneficiaries study Main recommendations of Technopolis • Data should be downloadable, searchable and compatible (at least on a national basis) • Commission to provide more detailed and prescriptive format, including common field descriptors for each compulsory field (e.g. Public co-financing and EU co-financing separate) • Commonly agreed data standards have to include field separators to allow the export of data (-> CSV file format) and the comparability and searchability of the data • MA to increase the update frequency of the information in the Lists of Beneficiaries (LoB)

  12. Suggested field names • Project name • (Lead) beneficiary name • EU co-funding • National public co-funding • Total funding • (Lead) Beneficiary address lines 1-3 • Post code • Project Summary • Project Summary (EN) • Project start date • Project end date • Project duration • Country • Last updated

  13. Please discuss this in the INFORM network group on www.regionetwork2020.eu E-mail: Peter.Fischer@ec.europa.eu

More Related