70 likes | 248 Views
The use of a performance profiling technique in a team setting: getting the athletes and coach on the "same page". Division I volleyball team Profiling: individual athletes, the team, and the coach -1 week into the practice season
E N D
The use of a performance profiling technique in a team setting: getting the athletes and coach on the "same page" Division I volleyball team Profiling: individual athletes, the team, and the coach -1 week into the practice season -midpoint of the competitive season -end of the competitive season Dale & Wrisberg (1996)
Pros • Intrinsic motivation • opposite of expert trying to convince athlete • cognitive evaluation theory – externally controlled events • Opens the door for conversation • Key determinants of elite performance • Accurate program construction • Progress tracking • Mental training like physical training: • Brings to life the analogy • Evaluating strengths and weaknesses
Performance profiling and predictive validityDoyle & Parfitt (1996) • Track and filed athletes • FIRST attempt to validate the use of a quantitative performance profiling • Baseline, then pre-three intra-season competitions • Authors suggest a baseline measure
Twin A enthusiasm knowledge connected optimistic genuine calm/confident professional = ideal engaged = self at present
Twin B relationship builder / social professional teamness fish for life = ideal promote self-awarenss = self at present
Resources • Dale, G,. & Wrisberg, G. (1996). The use of a performance profiling technique in a team setting: getting the athletes and coach on the "same page." The Sport Psychologist, 10(3), 261-277. • Jo Doyle, J., & Gaynor Parfitt, G. (1996). “Performance profiling and predictive validity.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8(2) 160-170.