1 / 45

Evaluating Who is Learning with Real Learning Connections

Evaluating Who is Learning with Real Learning Connections. Nora J. Bird Assistant Professor LIS Dept. Michael Crumpton Assistant Dean, University Libraries. AGENDA. Motivation and Theory Research Questions and Models Setting and Participants Sources of Evidence Results Students

india
Download Presentation

Evaluating Who is Learning with Real Learning Connections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluating Who is Learning with Real Learning Connections Nora J. Bird Assistant Professor LIS Dept. Michael Crumpton Assistant Dean, University Libraries Lilly Conference on College and University Teaching 2013

  2. AGENDA • Motivation and Theory • Research Questions and Models • Setting and Participants • Sources of Evidence • Results • Students • Faculty and Program • Librarians • Future Directions Lilly Conference 2013

  3. MOTIVATION The LIS Department has a mission of educating future librarians The University Libraries has many work/study opportunities for LIS students Lilly Conference 2013

  4. MOTIVATION Cooperation might provide: 1) Students with jobs but no tuition assistance 2) Help to tenure track librarians with publishing requirements 3) Re-education for LIS faculty without recent practice experience Lilly Conference 2013

  5. THEORY AND BACKGROUND Lilly Conference 2013

  6. Donald Schön • "In some fields, the question of professional artistry has come up in the context of continuing education. Educators ask how mature professionals can be helped to renew themselves so as to avoid 'burnout,' how they can be helped to build their repertoires of skills and understandings on a continuing basis.“ Educating the Reflective Practitioner p. 15 Lilly Conference 2013

  7. “Build or re-build their repertoireof skills and understandings…” • How does that work for faculty especially in disciplines that are tied to practice like: • Librarianship • Business Administration • Counseling • Architecture and Design Lilly Conference 2013

  8. Schön again • "In the terrain of professional practice, applied science and research-based technique occupy a critically important though limited territory, bounded on several sides by artistry." p. 13 Lilly Conference 2013

  9. Faculty renewing artistry.. • Where do theory and practice meet for faculty members? • How is that related to community engagement? Lilly Conference 2013

  10. Experiential Learning • Creating meaning via direct activities • Learning through meta-reflection • Engaging the full person • Facilitating learning through experience "For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them."[--Aritotle Lilly Conference 2013

  11. David Kolb on Experiential Learning • Learner must • be willing to be actively involved in the experience; • be able to reflect on the experience; • possess and use analytical skills to conceptualize the experience; and • possess decision making and problem solving skills in order to use the new ideas gained from the experience. Lilly Conference 2013

  12. Education is not training • Education is for the long term • Training are the skills to accomplish the present task • What is the epi Lilly Conference 2013

  13. Research questions and model Lilly Conference 2013

  14. Questions • R1: Is there a better, more connected model to describe the internship relationship in LIS? • R2: What are the benefits to all participants in the internship? • R3: How can the model be extended to other learning opportunities? Lilly Conference 2013

  15. Student Employee* Model • Learning goals defined by the practitioner • *or students working while in school Lilly Conference 2013

  16. Librarian • Student • Faculty • (research) Traditional Model of Internship/Practica • Reflection on process is primarily done by the student Lilly Conference 2013

  17. Current Theory and Research LIBRARIAN (action) Practical Work Experience FACULTY (knowledge) STUDENT (reflection) Academic Content Lilly Conference 2013

  18. setting and participants Lilly Conference 2013

  19. Setting • The University of North Carolina at Greensboro LIS Department and University Libraries • Collaboration between these fostered by • grant projects • alumni on staff • students employed in paid and unpaid positions Lilly Conference 2013

  20. Some definitions at UNCG • Practicum – working for class credit only. Usually project driven and goals satisfy curriculum • Internships – student workers paid by the hour and task driven. Additional training and experience are provided by librarians. • Graduate assistantship – Stipend plus tuition, work for the department as research assistants, etc. Lilly Conference 2013

  21. RLC Internships/Practica • Stipend paid by Libraries • Tuition subsidy paid by LIS Department • Projects were proposed by various departments in the Libraries and only some were funded • Students chosen by LIS Faculty and Chair and Libraries Assistant Dean and Dean in consultation with project librarians. Lilly Conference 2013

  22. Participants/Process • Projects were advertised to last during an academic year. • The second year more applications and an interview process • Third year most applications were from students new to the program • One faculty member involved in all 3 years; others depending on projects • Member of library administration involved in coordination Lilly Conference 2013

  23. Over the Years Lilly Conference 2013

  24. EVIDENCE Lilly Conference 2013

  25. Sources of Evidence • 2 years of sporadic journal entries • 3 years of learning objectives from faculty, students and practitioners • 2 1/2 years of summary reports from faculty, practitioner, and students • 2 administrative reports Lilly Conference 2013

  26. Project Learning Objectives • Each project was designed with learning objectives for all participants. • Self-assessment was done in the form of evaluations of the success of the projects and meeting of goals. Lilly Conference 2013

  27. Sample Learning Objectives From Year 2. Student: • Will understand selection criteria and other practical considerations surrounding the use of archival materials. • Will become familiar with technical standards and formats for digital projects. • Will become familiar with metadata schemas including technical, administrative, and descriptive metadata. • Will gain experience using digital collections management software. Lilly Conference 2013

  28. Learning Objectives Sample (con.) Librarian: • Will benefit from research into comparable projects that the student will complete during each phase. • Will be exposed to theoretical material being taught in courses such as LIS 631 (Emerging Trends in Information Access), LIS 640 (Organizing Library Collections),   Lilly Conference 2013

  29. Learning Objectives Sample (con.) Teaching Faculty: • Will see practical examination of theoretical concepts related to digitization and metadata for a digital project. • Will have the opportunity to examine issues of interdepartmental collaboration and communication. Lilly Conference 2013

  30. Summary Reports • Written from separate perspectives. • Cumulated in the administrative reports Lilly Conference 2013

  31. RESULTS Lilly Conference 2013

  32. Student Learning 1st Year • More than a Graduate Assistantship • Practical experience while learning “the basics” of library studies • Networking alliances • Academic financial support (Student) • Communicate academic initiatives and needs • Practitioner viewpoint encouraged • Collaborative and open – no hierarchy • Archives are a different discipline that require humility Lilly Conference 2013

  33. Student Learning 2nd Year • Ethical responsibilities of archivists especially in oral histories • Assessment methods and applications and the power of analytics • Collaboration in digital projects Lilly Conference 2013

  34. Student Learning 3rd Year so far • Teaching is not presentation and there are a million software programs • Conceptual framework for artifact collection. • Cloud computing and the impact on technical services Lilly Conference 2013

  35. A depth of student learning “The discussions surrounding these artifacts were some of the best learning experiences of the project, because they helped me to connect the conceptual aspect of the object with the people who would potentially come in to view the artifact.” -3rd year student participant Lilly Conference 2013

  36. Faculty Learning 2nd year • Role of Oral Histories in academic archives • Oral Histories as digital objects (transcription, abstracting, tagging) • Creation of a digital project – conception through implementation in ContentDM • Academic library assessment activities – is it research? Lilly Conference 2013

  37. Practitioner Learning • Learning goals • Relive LIS school lessons that get lost in the “chaos of work” • Recognize the need for learning something new while maintaining existing routines • Revisit their own learning activities Lilly Conference 2013

  38. Practitioner Learning • Working with student in this way • The student’s experience is a reminder of what it takes to process new information. In the midst of work this can be considered natural or forgotten completely. Lilly Conference 2013

  39. Some Products Lilly Conference 2013

  40. Beyond the participants Lilly Conference 2013

  41. LIS Department learning • Restructuring of LIS 650 to include more management • Incorporating more alternative formats • Cooperation among archives, cataloging, digital projects • Enhancement of Archives education experiences Lilly Conference 2013

  42. Learning for LIS Education • The Real Learning Connections model shows the impacts that can occur on practice, preparing students, and curriculum. Lilly Conference 2013

  43. Learning for Library Organizations • Renewal of learned theoretical concepts not used since academy • Bridges for expanding current practices • Insights into efficiencies and “better” practices • Collaborative and learned solutions • Higher level of sharing an experience • Better partners for LIS internship support Lilly Conference 2013

  44. Future Directions • Toolkit with self-guiding instructions for the librarian supervisor for implementing RLC practica • Partnerships with other institutions • Changes in “regular” practicum • Considerations for interns hired outside of project environment • Future project oriented methods of work Lilly Conference 2013

  45. REFERENCES Ash, S. L. and Clayton, P. H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative higher education, 29 (2): 137-154 Diambra, J. F., Cole-Zakrewski, K., and Booher, J. A. (2004). Comparison of internship stage models: Evidence from the intern experiences. Journal of Experiential Education 27 (2), 191-212. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development. London: Routledge. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Stauffer, S. (2006, November). A framework for a "Teaching Library": A preliminary study. Paper presented at the NYLA Annual Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY. Lilly Conference 2013

More Related