1 / 19

Prognosis in Acute WAD

Prognosis in Acute WAD. T hesis project of Dave Walton PT, PhD(cand.). Purpose. To develop a new tool for use with acute WAD patients that: Is clinically feasible Provides an estimate of the risk that a patient will develop persistent WAD-related morbidity

indra
Download Presentation

Prognosis in Acute WAD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Prognosis in Acute WAD Thesis project of Dave Walton PT, PhD(cand.)

  2. Purpose • To develop a new tool for use with acute WAD patients that: • Is clinically feasible • Provides an estimate of the risk that a patient will develop persistent WAD-related morbidity • Indicates the nature of the risk, focusing on modifiable barriers to recovery, that will help in clinical decision-making

  3. The process so far… • 2006 – 2007: Systematic review and meta-analysis of existing prognostic literature (JOSPT Fall 2008) • 2007: Construction of multi-dimensional model for the development of chronic WAD • 2007-2008: Development of the prototype tool using the model as a framework for item generation.

  4. Development of the tool • Items were generated by 5 physiotherapists with experience in treating WAD (mean clinical experience 12 years, range 8-18) • Well over 1000 items generated • Items reduced through group consensus and theoretical considerations • Items passed by experts from other fields (psychology, physiatry, questionnaire development)

  5. Development of the tool • Tool now consists of two parts • 93-item self-report questionnaire • 19-item physical assessment • Self-report questionnaire reviewed and edited by professional technical editor • Pilot testing: • Questionnaire: good acceptability so far, average of 15-20 mins to complete • Physical ax: reliability testing currently underway

  6. What are we capturing? • Self-report questionnaire: • Multiple sub-constructs hypothesized to predict multiple outcomes within the spectrum of ‘WAD’ • Symptoms • Coping strategies • Cognitions • Emotions • Past history

  7. What are we capturing? • Physical assessment: • ROM (ordinal) • Peripheral key muscle strength (nominal) • Reaction to traction/compression (nominal) • Neck flexion in supine (ordinal) • Sensation (nominal) • Algometry (ratio) • Symptom reproduction (for each)

  8. What are we predicting? • Recovery at 3 and 6 months post injury, defined as: • Not all bothered by symptoms over past week • No interference with normal activities over the past week • Very satisfied with current situation • No ongoing medication use for symptoms • Return to full work or school (not included for those unemployed or not in school)

  9. Secondary Outcomes • Neck Disability Index (10 items) • Core Whiplash Outcome Measures (5 items) • Patient Health Questionnaire (9-item depression screen) • PTSD Checklist (17-item PTSD screen) • Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (11-item fear/avoidance screen) • Other individual items (bothersomeness, ongoing litigation) • 65 items in total at follow-up

  10. Methods • Subjects who meet inclusion criteria are presented with the LOI and consent form at their first visit. • Those who consent: • Name and contact info is recorded on a master list, associated with an ID number • Given the prototype self-report questionnaire to complete within 24 hours • Completed forms are sealed in an envelope and returned to clinic staff for storage

  11. Methods • Standardized physical assessment is completed after subjective interview but before more targeted assessment techniques. Findings are recorded and stored securely with self-report questionnaire. • Master list must be stored in a locked cabinet with consent forms at night • Completed forms must be stored in a separate locked cabinet

  12. Completed forms • After either a) 10 completed forms have been collected OR b) once per month, completed forms (not master list) are sent to Dave Walton at UWO via Purolator (pre-paid). • Once per month master list is faxed to Dave’s private fax machine.

  13. Intervention • At therapist’s discretion. • We are not trying to control anything to do with intervention (good external validity, some sacrifice of internal validity) • We will ask you to complete a checklist of the general types of treatment provided, at either D/C or 6 months, whichever is first. This can be mailed or faxed.

  14. Follow-up • Arranged by Dave and/or research assistant, you don’t do anything regarding follow-up for the study. The process will be (FYI only): • We will either mail the forms to the patient’s house, or email the patient a link to a secure site with the forms online. • Forms are completed and either mailed back to Dave, or stored on secure server. • This is done 3- and 6-months post-injury (approx. 15-20 minutes to complete)

  15. What do we need? • Data! • Clinics who see WAD patients post-MVA within 4 weeks of injury • Clinicians who are willing to learn and perform the standardized assessment on patients at their first visit (pretty straightforward) • Clinics with staff who are willing to: • Screen potential subjects for inclusion criteria (w/i 4 weeks of injury, at least 18, able to read English) • Provide the LOI, consent form and questionnaire • Keep a master list and consent forms in a locked cabinet • Fax the master list to Dave once/month

  16. Targets • 530 total subjects • As many clinics as are interested • Ethics approval and data collection to start in May ‘08

  17. What will you get? • All the forms, including questionnaires, master list with pre-generated ID numbers, envelopes. • Instructional manual and video for performing physical assessment • A digital algometer and set of monofilaments for sensory testing, for the clinic, as long as you act as a data collection site • Recognition as a data collection site (certificate) • That warm fuzzy feeling that comes from contributing to research in the field

  18. The research team • Dave Walton PT, FCAMT, PhD(cand.) • Dr. Joy MacDermid PT, PhD • Dr. Robert Teasell MD • Dr. Warren Nielson, Psychologist, PhD • Jennifer Toland PT, FCAMT, MClSc(cand.) • Hilary Reese PT, FCAMT, MClSc(cand.) • Tamara Nailer PT, MClSc(cand.) • Lenerdene Levesque PT, FCAMT, MClSc(cand.)

  19. Want more info? • The forms, including assessment manual, and more information, are available on-line at: http://publish.uwo.ca/~dwalton5/Website Or, contact Dave at: dwalton5@uwo.ca Thanks! Whiplash, the cowboy monkey

More Related