1 / 17

AQIP Status Report

AQIP Status Report. An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey. November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September 2003 AQIP Portfolio February 2004 AQIP Feedback November 2007 new Portfolio due. Strategic Issues. Lack of a process focus

infinity
Download Presentation

AQIP Status Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion

  2. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey • November 2000 AQIP admission • 2002 First action projects submitted • September 2003 AQIP Portfolio • February 2004 AQIP Feedback • November 2007 new Portfolio due

  3. Strategic Issues • Lack of a process focus • Lack of a centralized data collection methodology • Lack of a leadership development system

  4. Lack of a Process Focus • Annual operating plan and budget integration • Academic program review • Grants development system • Small facilities needs process • Board policy review system • Program Audits • Work Load definition and documentation

  5. Lack of a Centralized Data Collection System • Full implementation of Datatel • User groups and training for Datatel • Upgrade to version 18 • Implementation of FRX reporting • Established Vice President for Institutional Research and Planning • Active participation in CQIN

  6. Lack of a Leadership Development Program • Presidential Leadership Academy • Leadership reading series • Student support services program review process • Grants program • CTX and Organizational Development • Transcript process for training • Focus in Strategic Plan

  7. Criterion 1Helping Students Learn • Academic advising center • CSLOs established and used • On-line tutorial models • Welding pilot curriculum • New program approval process • Adjunct faculty development process

  8. Criterion 2 Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives • Improving our advisory committees • External program accreditation • LERN and FAS assistance in program improvement • New facilities Master Plan

  9. Criterion 3 Understanding Student and Other Stakeholder Needs • Licensure rate achievement rate review • CCSSE and Noel Levitz data use • Lumina and student data use • Focus groups with students and community

  10. Criterion 4 Valuing People • Strategic plan • Center for Teaching Excellence (CTX) • Office of Organizational Development • FT Technology Trainer • PEARLS • Workload documentation and clarification

  11. Criterion 5Leading and Communicating • Use of a Cabinet • Presidential Advisory Committees • Tell it to the President and Vice Presidents • Learning Leadership Handbook for Deans • New Employee Orientation

  12. Criterion 6 Supporting Institutional Objectives • Wide use of data sources • Lumina participation • Performance objectives and scorecard • State performance targets • Integration of planning

  13. Criterion 7Measuring Effectiveness • Benchmarking • Online scorecard • Board presentations • Vice President of Institutional Research and Planning • Achieving the Dream • Quality Council research focus

  14. Criterion 8 Planning for Continuous Improvement • New Mexico Performance Objectives • Quick Quality Checks • Linkage of all planning and budgeting systems

  15. Criterion 9Building Collaborative Relationships • Strategic plan focus • Large number of active partnerships • Placement rates • Employer satisfaction • Support for SJC Foundation

  16. Lessons Learned • Evaluation needs to feed back into planning • Systems must be documented • Need a better system for leading the quality initiatives • Action projects need to be linked and focused to the strategic plan

  17. Next Steps • Develop a Quality Champion Team • Institutionalize and document procedures for annual AQIP portfolio update • Build sustainability in all systems

More Related