430 likes | 605 Views
Session 9. Assessment in Career Counseling Ethics in Testing. Schedule. Overview MBTI SII Ethics. Overview. Parsons (1909) encouraged assessment as first step in three-step model of career counseling “Test and Tell” approach not current
E N D
Session 9 Assessment in Career Counseling Ethics in Testing
Schedule • Overview • MBTI • SII • Ethics
Overview • Parsons (1909) encouraged assessment as first step in three-step model of career counseling • “Test and Tell” approach not current • Spokane: purpose of career assessment is to find career possibilities congruent with client’s attributes, assess conflicts and problems, motivate constructive behavior, acquire a cognitive structure for evaluating career alternatives, clarify expectation and plan interventions, and to establish the range of abilities
Personality MBTI Interests SII, Career Assessment Inventory, SDS, Kuder OIS, Kuder GIS, Jackson VI Abilities and Skills ASVAB, DAT, CISS Values Values Scale, Salience Inv, Minnesota Importance Qu Career Decision Process Career Dec Scale, My Vocational Situation, Assessment of Career Decision Making, CDM-Self efficacy, CDM-Difficulties Career Maturity CMI, Career Dev Inventory Integrated system Kuder Career Planning Interest inventory Skills assessment Work values inventory Available online Computer assisted Discover SIGI-Plus Career Assessment
MBTI • Based on Jungian theory • Myers and Briggs began developing the test in the early 1940’s to bring Jung’s Personality Theory to the general public on the belief that it could help people in everyday life • Has over 50 years of research and development • It is the most widely used instrument for understanding normal personality differences.
Uses • Help people understand themselves and their behaviors • appreciate others so as to make constructive use of individual differences • make a start with personal development. • see that approaching problems in different ways can be healthy and productive for themselves and the groups they belong to or aspire to belong to (family, organization, collaborative teams).
Four dimensions • Extraversion (E) OR Introversion (I) • Sensing (S) OR Intuition (N) • Thinking (T) OR Feeling (F) • Judging (J) OR Perceiving (P)
A one year trip • Visit the world • Stay together • 10 million dollars
Strong Interest Inventory • One of most widely used and most researched inventories • Results in six-page profile • Explores general interests, occupational interests, and lifestyle
Validity Check • At least 30 items answered • Infrequent responses-negative number means should explore why • Administrative indices • Provide distribution on “like,” “indifferent to, and “Dislike”; the “Yes,” “?,” and the “No”; and the left, middle or right choices • Look for extreme response percentages
Interpretation • Begin by discussing Holland codes • Focus on three areas • General Occupational Scales (GOTs) • Basic Interest Scales (BISs) • Occupational Scale (OSs) • While describing GOTs, relate to BISs under each theme • Explore specific OSs
Interpretation (cont) • Total of 211 OSs,107 for women and 104 for men • Explore occupations with T score of 40 or higher • Personal Styles Scale (cautious) • Work Style (people vs. ideas, data, things) • Learning Environment (academic to practical) • Leadership Style (directing vs. persuading) • Risk Taking/Adventure (play it safe or take risks)
Scoring, norms, psychometric information • Mean on all scales is 50 and SD = 10 • Test-retest for GOTs from .84 to .92 and .80 to .94 in BISs • Items chosen that differentiate interests of those in an occupation from the general sample • Separate gender norms are used
Scoring (cont) • 200 individuals for each occupational group • Satisfied • 3 years work experience • Perform typical job duties • Between 25 and 60 • Cautious interpretation of OSs because scales vary in predictive and concurrent validity • Personal Style Scales are new and have less validity data
Case Study Your team is working with a family who has come in for counseling. They are Mom, Dad, Maternal Grandmother (MG), a daughter, a son, and a male, 14 year old cousin. The cousin’s parents were killed in a car accident over a year ago. The cousin has been in grief counseling and has resolved many of the difficulties related to his parents’ deaths. The boy had been living with his grandparents, who it was deemed, were so strict with him that he would prefer to live with his aunt and uncle. Mom and Dad asked Cousin if he would like to join their family with Daughter (15) and Son (11). They have come to counseling as a family to learn how to purposefully integrate into a new family. You administer the MBTI and come up with the following: Maternal Grandmother: ESTJ Dad: ISTJ Mom: ENFJ Daughter: ESFJ Son: INFP Cousin: E/INTP How might you work with this family to help them learn about themselves, appreciate one another’s uniqueness, predict possible rougher areas, and brainstorm alternative responses to possible rough areas?
1994 School-to-Work Opportunities Act • Stipulated that students should identify career goals prior to entering high school and begin an actual career plan • American School Counselor Association and U. S. Army developed materials available on ASCA’s web
Gender • Differences between men and woman • Interest inventories should use same sex norms • Opportunity dominance vs. socialization dominance – low interest may be a result of experiences and opportunities so low interest scores should be explored
Ethnic and Cultural Differences • Culturally Appropriate Model • Culturally encompassing information gathering • Culturally appropriate selection of instruments • Culturally appropriate administration • Culturally appropriate interpretation of assessment data
Legal and Ethical Issues in Assessment Ignorance is no defense
Sources for Ethical Decisions • ACA Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice • Code of Fair Testing Practices in Education • Standards for School Counselor Competence in Assessment and Evaluation • Other Resources
Invasion of Privacy • Informed consent • Relevance
Right to Results • Regardless of scoring mechanism, counselors are responsible to provide appropriate explanations • Must interpret in terms that client can understand
Least Stigmatizing Label • If categories are used, must be described precisely • Sometimes diagnosis is related to treatment and even if counselor is trying to be helpful, it is both illegal and unethical to change a diagnosis
Computerized Assessment • Ethical issues in the use of computerized assessment
Civil Rights Act of 1991 • Griggs v. Duke Power Company • If instrument has an adverse or disparate impact, employer must show that hiring procedures are job related • Brought about stronger focus on validity of employment tests
Ban on separate norms • U. S. Employment Services used separate norms for African Americans and Hispanics on GATB • Act said this is illegal
Policies and Procedures for Processing Complaints of Ethical Violations • ACA • Consult with colleagues • Clients can charge • Must indicate specific ethics violated • Due process
Disabilities Acts • American with Disabilities Act of 1990 • Focus on employment and unemployment testing • Fair measures and assessment procedures needed
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997 • PL 94-142 • Use variety of tools and strategies, no single procedure, technically sound instruments • Attend to multicultural issues
Family Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 • Student right to privacy • No release of records without permission • Counseling records kept in separate locked cabinet and accessible only to the counselor are not considered part of educational record
Without parental permission kids cannot be given psychological testing or treatment that may reveal information concerning mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to student or student’s family
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA) • Very complicated • Concerns security and privacy of health information • State laws take precedence • If involved with third party payment, HIPPA is involved • Must develop, maintain, and account for disclosures of private client information for 6 years
Truth in Testing • New York state • Nadar and SAT • Mandated that if student asked, copy of questions and correct answers must be provided • Only CA passed similar legislation
Test Bias and Placement • Issue is use of intelligence tests with African American students because of discrimination • Larry P. v. Riles (1979)- Judge Peckham bans use of intelligence testing in CA because discriminatory • PASE v. Hannon (1980)– judge ruled opposite way • 1992, Judge Peckham lifts ban
Minimum Competency • Minimum competency – kids graduating from high school and can’t balance check book • Controversy centers on discrimination • Debra P. v. Turlington (1981) in FL
Ruling set precedent about need for relationship between curriculum and minimum competency testing • If students not taught material covered on test, students’ Constitutional rights (equal protection and due process) are violated
Right to Privacy • Soroka et al. v. Dayton-Hudson Company (1991) • Target used personality inventory for employment screening • Court ruled that constitutional right to privacy and statutory prohibition against improper inquiries and discriminatory conduct was violated by asking about religious beliefs and sexual orientation