1 / 16

Moral Development in Higher Education: A Guide to Working with Chinese International Students

Moral Development in Higher Education: A Guide to Working with Chinese International Students. Huacong Liu, Matthew Day, and Janelle Papay The Pennsylvania State University. Moral Development Importance.

inga
Download Presentation

Moral Development in Higher Education: A Guide to Working with Chinese International Students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Moral Development in Higher Education: A Guide to Working with Chinese International Students Huacong Liu, Matthew Day, and Janelle Papay The Pennsylvania State University

  2. Moral Development Importance • Cheating, cooperative behavior, voting preferences, social activism, adhering to contracts, and helping those in need • Moral reasoning is related to differences in cultural background • Chinese students represent 25.4% of the total international student population in the U.S. • Chinese culture is characterized by Confucian Collectivism • American culture emphasizes individualism

  3. Definition of Moral Development “Moral competence refers to the affective orientation to perform altruistic behaviors towards others and the ability to judge moral issues logically, consistently, and at an advanced level of development” - Ma, 2011

  4. Theoretical Framework Kohlberg’s Six-Stage Model of Principled Moral Reasoning Development

  5. Conceptual Framework

  6. Inputs • Confucian Morality • Concept of Self • Rule of Law • Academic culture • Language Skills • Cognitive Motivation

  7. Environment

  8. Outcomes

  9. Model

  10. Discussion Globalization Social Justice Engagement

  11. Globalization • Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan • Variations in pre-college traits among students from mainland China

  12. Social Justice Chinese students may not be given opportunities to have a “voice” in society’s moral decision-making Stereotypes

  13. Engagement • First-Year International Students were found to be more engaged than their U.S. American counterparts • With faculty & staff • Academic challenge • Technology use • Active and collaborative learning • Senior International Students • Academic work • Technology use • Diversity-related activities

  14. Implications • Institutions Awareness of what affects Moral Reasoning Development in Chinese International Students • Curriculum • Co-curricular activities • Adaptation of environment • Quality Faculty & Staff • Application to other cultures that are characterized by collectivism

  15. Questions?

  16. References • Bar-Yam, M., Kohlberg, L. & Naame, A. (1980). Moral reasoning of students in different cultural, social, and educational settings. American Journal of Education, 88(3) 345-362.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/443530 • Bonawitz, M. (2002). Analysis and comparison of the moral development of students required to graduate with an ethics course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University. • Chang, K.A. (1996). Culture, power and the social construction of morality: Moral voices of Chinese students. Journal of Moral Education, 25(2). 141-157. doi:10.1080/0305724960250201 • Cooper, M., & Schwartz, R. (2007). Moral judgment and student discipline: What are institutions teaching? What are students learning? Journal of College Student Development, 48(5) 595-607 doi: 10.1353/csd.2007.0049 • Hau, K.T. & Lew, W.J.F. (1989). Moral development of Chinese students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Psychology. 24(1-5). 561-569. doi:10.1080/00207594.1989.10600066 • Hurtado, S., Mayhew, M. J., & Engberg, M. E. (2003, November). Diversity in the classroom and students' moral reasoning. In annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, OR. • Leask, B. (2006). Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor—implications for academic staff development. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 183–199. doi:10.1080/02602930500262486 • Mayhew, M.J., Seifert, T.A., & Pascarella, E.T. (2010). A multi-institutional assessment of moral reasoning development among first-year students. The Review of Higher Education (33)3, 357–390. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.0153

More Related