1 / 26

Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics. Andr é DeHon 2003. Presented By Mahmoud Ben Naser. Move to Nanotechnology. CMOS size limits Cost of Fabrication. Source: Kahng/ITRS2001. Differences with current technology. CMOS Top Down construction

inge
Download Presentation

Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Array-Based Architecture for FET-Based, Nanoscale Electronics André DeHon 2003 Presented By Mahmoud Ben Naser

  2. Move to Nanotechnology • CMOS size limits • Cost of Fabrication Source: Kahng/ITRS2001

  3. Differences with current technology CMOS • Top Down construction • Precise placement of devices Nanotechnology • Bottom Up construction • Stochastic assembly.

  4. Building Blocks (Wires) • Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs or NT) • Silicon NanoWires (SiNW or NW)

  5. Carbon Nanotube • Built by “exploding” carbon or carbon vapor. • Can be conducting or semiconducting • A few nm diameter • Can’t selectively manufacture one type or the other.

  6. Silicon Nanowires • “Grown” by vapor deposition • Precise diameter control of a few nm • Microns long • Selectively dope length to control electrical properties

  7. Devices (Switches) • CNT Suspended Memories • Molecular Switches • SiNW FET

  8. CNT switches • CNTs in parallel suspended above perpendicular set of CNTs

  9. SiNW • Core Shell NW • Gated by NT or NW Diode FET

  10. Architecture Using building blocks and switches what can we build? • Crossbar Arrays • Memory, PLA, or Interconnect • Collection of small arrays to exploit logical structure and isolate faults

  11. Electrical Operation Diode Logic • NW or NT crosspoint directly touching • Wired-OR • Programmable Junction • Problem: Non-restring

  12. Electrical Operation • FET Logic (PFET) • Problems: • Generally Non-Programmable Logic • Static Power Consumption

  13. NOR Results

  14. Using the Crossbar Array • Connect to the microworld without loosing gains from nano-pitch • Program junctions

  15. Addressing individual NWs • Can’t connect a mW to each NW. • Use a nanodecoder with 2-hot addressing (minimize the effect fault on address line). To Crossbar Array

  16. Nano-Decoder Evaluation • Advantage: Precise predefined codeset • Only loose Sqrt(n) wires on address fault • Disadvantage: Hard to create nano-imprint pattern • Use axially doped NW instead

  17. Big Picture 4 Decoders 2 Decoders Can disable decoders if needed during operation

  18. Programmable FET Arrays • Using Core-Shelled NWs on the bottom and NTs on the top. • During operation use decoder as pull up or pull down network.

  19. Bigger Picture

  20. Crosspoint Density • Decoders add a lot of overhead, is it still worth it to “go nano”? • Still do better then CMOS bit-density. Can easily achieve 50% of core density.

  21. Defect Tolerance Types of defects • Broken wire • Defective crosspoint • Defective array • Add Redundancy

  22. Broken Wire • Components fully interchangeable • Rout around defect.

  23. Defective Crosspoints • HP calculates 15% of crospoints “Stuck” • Use algorithm to successfully rout around this

  24. Defective Array • Though more unlikely, it’s possible. • Ensure availability of more resources to completely rout around the array.

  25. Effects of Defects • Look at expected yield of address decoder and multiply by expected yield of crossbar array. • Both dependant on design model chosen • Type of codes used in decoder • Building block used

  26. Conclusion • Nanoelectronic systems provide several advantages over conventional silicon, most importantly increased density. • Because of their extremely small size, nanoscale devices present new problems in fabrication and fault tolerance that must be overcome. • must be able to interface with conventional silicon chips, at least in the short run.

More Related