480 likes | 659 Views
Endeavour for Excellence. Week 3 Day 2. Change!. A Conceptual Framework derived from Social Role Valorisation. What is our mission?. What is the primary purpose of our work? What kind of outcomes or results do we hope for ? ‘ THE GOOD LIFE’. Universal good things of life. Family
E N D
Endeavour for Excellence Week 3 Day 2
A Conceptual Framework derived from Social Role Valorisation
What is our mission? • What is the primary purpose of our work? • What kind of outcomes or results do we hope for? ‘THE GOOD LIFE’
Universal good things of life • Family • Home • Intimacy • Belonging • Friends • Respect & fairness • Safety & Security • Opportunities to develop one’s abilities • Work • Being treated as an individual • Having a say • Access to community places • Ordinary social life • Contributing • Good health
Why is it different? Why do so many people who rely on our supports not have the things most of us describe as the ‘good life’?
Devaluation - A harsh reality • Someone is seen as outside the norm, different • The difference is viewed in a negative way
Societal (not individual) values • Narrow definition of beauty • Physical strength/ability, athleticism • Productivity • Material belongings/wealth • Competence, intelligence • Survival of the ‘fittest’ • Youth, newness • Dominance
Valued vs. devalued • Person w/deformityDependent adultUnemployed personHomeless personPoor personPhysical laborerPerson w/intellectual disability • Movie star/modelAthlete/championProfessionalHomeownerMillionaireSurgeon, solicitorUniversity graduate
Perceived devaluation • Devaluation is not about people’s inherent worth, but their perceived worth – it is in the eyes and minds of others
Unconsciousness of devaluation • Devaluation can be conscious, but is most often unconscious • Even enlightened, kind, progressive people (including human service workers!) devalue others
Devaluation matters • Devaluation explains why people don’t have equal access to the good things in life that others do • Being devalued results in the likelihood that bad things will happen to you, that you will be treated in ways that wouldn’t be tolerated for/by valued citizens
Common life experiences DISABILITY BECOMES LIFE DEFINING • Disability becomes the focus of what people know about a person, as if that is what matters most • Decisions are erroneously made based on one narrow dimension of who a person is
Common life experiences SEGREGATED AND CONGREGATED • People are separated (segregated) away from valued society • People are grouped (congregated) with other people who are also devalued
Common life experiences PEOPLE ARE DEPRIVED OF TYPICAL EXPERIENCES • Lack of opportunities to learn ordinary things in the ordinary developmental sequence • Exposed to non-typical circumstances, sometimes learning unusual habits
Common life experiences CAST INTO HURTFUL NEGATIVE ROLES • Eternal child • Object of pity • Menace • Burden • Client
Common life experiences LONELY • Very few freely-given friendships • A disproportionate number of friends with disabilities • Sometimes stressed or absent family relationships • Almost a total lack of intimate relationships
Common life experiences LOW EXPECTATIONS • People have grown up with the expectation that they ‘can’t’ • We have limited imaginations about what is possible • what people can do (or learn to do) • roles they can play, • lifestyle they can enjoy (with good support) • Low expectations become self-fulfilling
Common life experiences LIVES WASTED AND TRIVIALIZED • People are not seen as having an important purpose in life • People are typically minded or entertained rather than invested in • People’s time is often wasted, services not potent
Likely impacts of devaluation • Preoccupation with one’s own condition • Feeling/acting like an alien in the world • Sorrowing over all the good things missed and the bad things suffered • A sense of worthlessness, dislike of self • Insecurity • Fear of failure and resulting avoidance • Searching for the abandoner
Likely impacts of devaluation • Fantasy and inventions about positive relationships that don’t exist • Seeking/demanding physical contact • Testing the genuineness of relationships • Withdrawing from contact and/or reality • Turning the hurt into resentment or hatred • Rage, perhaps even violence, at the world or self • A sapping of physical and mental energy
The relevance of woundedness • We need to avoid providing services which continue to impose wounds on people – congregation, loneliness, low expectations, etc. • We need to take into account the impact of the wounds people have experienced
Social roles • How we introduce ourselves or become known to others • What defines who we are, our identity • Is the place we hold in society, where and with whom we belong • How we are remembered in the end • “I am a . . . (noun)”
Roles have a big impact • Our image in the eyes of others • Our own self-image • Acceptance and belonging • Degree of autonomy and freedom • Opportunity to make our contribution • Quantity and quality of relationships • Personal growth and development • Material possessions
Valued & devalued roles A role may be positive or valued - good neighbor, student, member A role may be negative or devalued - client, eternal child, object of pity
Primary goals of SRV • Protect the socially valued roles held by the person • Avoid adding new negative, devalued roles • Escape or disprove negative roles that have become a part of a person’s identity
Primary goals of SRV • Enter into new valued roles • Deepen, defend and embed socially valued roles
Common goals of service • Minding • Protecting • Entertaining • Changing • Evaluating • Keeping people busy
From activities to roles ACTIVITY • Going to church • Working • Swimming • Cooking • Taking a class • Painting ROLE • Church member • Employee • Swimmer • Cook • Student • Artist
Primary SRV strategies • Image Enhancement • Competency Enhancement
People generally become what they are expected to be • Self-fulfilling prophesy • Our role in breaking the vicious cycle
Culturally valued analog “What happens for valued citizens of the same age, gender and culture?”
Supporting choice and self direction • It’s not about taking anything away from someone, it is about offering better options!
Non-programmatic issues that constrain programmatic ones • Funding • History • Legal issues • Political • Staffing • Personalities
Sequence matters! • Typically services are pre-designed based on professional ideologies about what people needDecisions are made before knowing who will avail of the servicePeople are then ‘fit into’ the model
Discovery • Getting to know people in a different and deeper way • Focusing on: • Capacity • Commonality • Contribution/Citizenship • Context • Seeking potential and possibility
Defining a desirable lifestyle • A HOME of One’s Own • Of person’s choosing, in typical setting, with people chosen • Valued Social ROLES • Adult, citizen, neighbor, sibling, aunt/uncle, employee, volunteer, artist, member, friend • RELATIONSHIPS • Friends, acquaintances, colleagues, neighbors, lovers
Mallory • Deficiency-based focus • Profound intellectual disability, IQ immeasurable • Quadriplegic • Epileptic • Nonverbal • Tires easily • Doesn’t tolerate temperature extremes
Mallory • Capacity-based focus • Can move her head 90 degrees to the right • Laughs and cries at appropriate times • Loves to be read to • Enjoys young children • Cares about access and fairness • Loves her animals! Being outdoors • Appreciates nice, pretty things • Flower garden • Peaceful, serene home
Thank you • www.genio.ie