520 likes | 838 Views
The Pygmy Dipole Resonance – status and new developments. From Giants to Pygmies – a short history Electromagnetic and hadronic interaction : Methods and experimental status Open questions and new experiments. Andreas Zilges University of Cologne.
E N D
The Pygmy Dipole Resonance – statusandnewdevelopments • FromGiantstoPygmies – a shorthistory • Electromagneticandhadronicinteraction:Methodsand experimental status • Open questionsandnewexperiments Andreas ZilgesUniversity of Cologne 11th International Spring Seminar in honorof Aldo Covello Ischia, May 2014
Dipole responseofatomicnuclei Ex [MeV] 5 10 15 E1 PYGMY GDR OCTUPOLECOUPLING Strength (a.u.) N. PietrallaR. Schwengner 2QP Strength (a.u.) GAMOWTELLER M1 Ex [MeV] 5 10 15
Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) 1937: Z. Phys. 106 (1937) 236
75 yearsago 1938: ... nature141 (1938) 326
Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) 1937: Z. Phys. 106 (1937) 236 1944: J. Phys. (USSR) 8 (1944) 331
Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) 1947: Photo-Fission in Uranium Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 3
Giant Dipole Resonance (GDR) PDR GDR Ex = 31 A-1/3 + 21 A-1/6 about 100%of EWSR Strength (a.u.) 5 10 15 Energy [MeV]
Pygmy Dipole Resonance (PDR) 1961: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 11 (1961) 259
Pygmy Dipole Resonance (PDR) 1961: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 11 (1961) 259 1969: Can. J. Phys. 47 (1969) 2850
Pygmy Dipole Resonance (PDR) 1971: R. Mohan, M. Danos, and L.C. Biedenharn,Phys. Rev. C 3 (1971) 1740 Z protons, Z neutrons, N-Z excessneutrons
Pygmy Dipole Resonance (PDR) 2002: Phys. Lett. B 542 (2002) 43 (g,g‘)
Fromgiantstopygmies PDR GDR about 100%of EWSR 1-5%of EWSR Strength (a.u.) 5 10 15 Energy [MeV]
Fromgiantstopygmies PDR GDR Strength (a.u.) 5 10 15 Energy [MeV]
Relevanceoflow-lying E1 strength • PDR as a universal „collective“ excitationmode • Connection toneutronskin, neutronstarradius • Slopeofsymmetryenergy in EoS • Impact on nucleosynthesis P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz, PRC 81 (2010) 051303(R) J. Piekarewicz et al., PRC 85 (2012) 041302(R) J. Erler et al., PRC 87 (2013) 044320 A. Carbone et al. PRC 81 (2010) 041301(R) B.A. Brown and A. Schwenk, PRC 89 (2014) 011307(R) S. Goriely, PLB 436 (1998) 10 E. Litvinova et al., NPA 823 (2009) 26
Study ofthe E1 strengthdistribution via electromagneticinteraction (g,g‘) (g,n) Sn Strength (a.u.) 5 10 15 Ex [MeV] The photonscanbe real orvirtual!
Scatteringof real photons (g,g‘) • Eg = 0 - Sn • veryselectiveexcitation (DJ=1 or 2) • energyresolutionDE=5-10 keV • complexsensitivitylimit • onlystablenucleicanbestudied (g,g‘) S-DALINAC@TUDELBE@HZDR HIGS@DUKE ELI@Bukarest rawspectrum! Counts D. Savran et al., PRC 84 (2011) 024326 Energy [keV]
E1 distribution in stablenuclei: (g,g‘) S-DALINAC ELBE 89Y N. Benouaret et al., PRC 79 (2009) 014303 D. Savran et al., PRC 84 (2011) 024326 S. Volz et al., NPA 779 (2006) 1 A. Zilges et al., PLB 542(2002) 43
Scatteringofvirtualphotons via (p,p‘) at 0° • Ex = 0 – 25 MeV • energyresolutionDE=25 keV • lessselective, complexdisentanglement • onlystablenucleicanbestudied 208Pb GRAND RAIDEN@RCNP A. Tamii et al., PRL 107 (2011) 062502
Coulomb interaction in inverse kinematics • Ecm = few 100 MeV/A • radioactivenucleicanbestudied • energyresolutionDE=500 keV • complexdataevaluation LAND@FRS@GSINeuLAND@R3B@FAIR … gtalkbyO. Wieland P. Adrich et al., PRL 95 (2005) 132501
Summed B(E1) strengthofPygmy Dipole Resonance D. Savran, T. Aumann, andA. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210
Parametrizationof „exoticity“ DCCF=(S2p – S2n)/2 + EC [MeV] 208Pb 140Ce 68Ni 132Sn 48Ca chartofnuclidesfrom: P.D. Cottle, nature465 (2010) 430
PDR vs. Coulomb correctedFermyenergy Non-consistentdatasets! D. Savran, T. Aumann, andA. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210
PDR or GDR ? • Electromagneticprobesyieldmainlydistributionof E1 strength (and– sometimes– branchingratios) • Isthere an alternative experimental approachto separate thelow-lyingdipolestrength (or PDR)fromthe GDR ?
Structureofthe PDR: (g,g‘) vs. (a,a‘) vs. (p,p‘) A coincidentdetectionofthegdecayenhancestheselectivity andenergyresolutionof (a,a‘) and (p,p‘) g (a,a‘g) and (p,p‘g) T.D. Poelhekken et al., PLB 278 (1992) 423
(a,a‘g) and (p,p‘g) experiments (a,a‘g) • Ecm = 30-200 MeV/A • BBS@KVI (deceased 15/11/12) • K600 @ iThemba LABS • CAGRA campaign @ RCNP • BigRIPS@RIKEN D. Savran et al., NIM A564(2006) 267 abeam
Structureofthe PDR: (a,a‘g) experiments 124Sn Janis Endres et al., PRL 105 (2010) 112503 Janis Endres et al., PRC 85(2012) 064331
Splitting ofstrength: Experimental results D. Savran et al., PRL 97 (2006) 172502 J. Endres et al., PRC 80 (2009) 034302 J. Endres, E.Litvinovaet al., PRL 105(2010) 212503 V. Derya et al., NPA 906 (2013) 94
Transition densitiesfor 1-states in 208Pb PDR region Equationof Motion Phonon Method GDR region D. Bianco, F. Knapp, N. Lo Iudice, F. Andreozzi, A. Porrino, and P. Vesely, PRC 86 (2012) 044327 gtalkbyF. Knapp
Splitting ofthe PDR: Interpretation from RQTBA Surfaceneutronoscillationmode, the „real“ PDR Isovectormode Janis Endres et al., PRL 105 (2010) 112503 Janis Endres et al., PRC 85 (2012) 064331
gdecay after inelasticscatteringof17O on 208Pb L. Pellegri, A. Bracco, et al., EUNPC 2012 gtalkbyL. Pellegri
Open questions • Systematics (mass, N/Z, exoticity) • Decaypattern • Comparisonofelectromagneticandhadronicexcitation • Single-particlestructure
E1 strength in light nuclei: 40Ca and48Ca V. Derya et al., PLB 730 (2014) 288
Isospinstructureofthe PDR in exoticnuclei: (a,a‘) in inverse kinematicsatBigRIPS@RIKEN liquid 4He NaI+LaBr
Single-particlestructureofthe PDR 119Sn(d,pg)120Sn measured at SONIC@HORUS, Cologne PRELIMINARY, April 2014 S.G. Pickstone, A. Hennig, M. Spieker, V. Derya, M. Weinert, J. Wilhelmy
GDR PDR
GDR PDR
The Pygmy Dipole Resonance – statusandnewdevelopments V. Derya, J. Endres, A. Hennig, J. Mayer, L. Netterdon, S. Pascu, S.G. Pickstone, P. Scholz, M. Spieker, M. Weinert, J. Wilhelmy, and A. Z. Institut für Kernphysik, University of Cologne M.N. Harakeh and H.J. Wörtche KVI Groningen, The Netherlands D. Savran Extreme Matter Institute EMMI, Darmstadt (ZI 510/4-2, SFB 634, INST 216/544-1, and BCGS) supportedby (RII3-CT-2004-506065)
The calculatedneutronskinscaleswiththeCoulomb corrected Fermi energydifferences microscopiccalculations D. Savran, T. Aumann, andA. Zilges, PPNP 70 (2013) 210
Splitting ofthe PDR: Theoryfor124Sn J. Endres, E. Litvinova, V. Ponomarevet al., PRC 85 (2012) 064331
spdf-IBA calculationofthe PDR S. Pascu et al., PRC 85 (2012) 064315
Proton andneutroncontributiontothe PDR E. Yüksel et al., NPA 877 (2012) 35
Isoscalar / isovectorpartofthe E1 strength D. Vretenar et al., arxiv :1202.5663v1
208Pb: (a,a‘g) vs. (g,g‘) M. Spieker, IKP, University of Cologne
Neutron skinsymmetryenergy L= slopeparameterofsymmetryenergy E1 responsecalculatedwith different RPA modelsbased on Skyrmeeffectiveforces plus mesonexchangeeffectiveLagrangians A. Carbone et al., PRC 81 (2010) 041301(R)
Relevanceof PDR • Universal „collective“ excitationmode • Connection toneutronstarradius, neutronskin P.-G. Reinhard and W. Nazarewicz, PRC 81 (2010) 051303(R) J. Piekarewicz et al., PRC 85 (2012) 041302 (R) J. Erler et al., PRC 87 (2013) 044320
Relevanceof PDR • Universal collectiveexcitationmode • Connection toneutronstarradius, neutronskin • Slopeofsymmetryenergy in EoS A. Carbone et al. PRC 81 (2010) 041301(R)
„PDR“ in title orabstractof PRL, PRC, PLB, NPA • theory/experiment = 2/1 • manymorearticles not usingthedenotation „PDR“ 2000 2005 2010