130 likes | 268 Views
The current efficacy of ARV in keeping viral loads down – the population perspective. Valerie Delpech and Alison Brown. Overview. Current levels of ARV coverage Patients eligible for ARV remaining untreated Among the treated: Predictors for sub-optimal adherence
E N D
The current efficacy of ARV in keeping viral loads down – the population perspective Valerie Delpech and Alison Brown
Overview • Current levels of ARV coverage • Patients eligible for ARV remaining untreated • Among the treated: • Predictors for sub-optimal adherence • Predictors for short term virological failure • Surveillance perspective: HAS or CAN have an impact on transmission?
Proportion of patients with CD4<350 cells not receiving ARV: 2009 Ethnicity, HIV exposure and residential deprivation not significant in multi-variate analysis
Clinical outcomes Four outcomes have been developed to monitor key aspects of treatment and care: Outcome 1 - time between HIV diagnosis & the patient being integrated in to HIV care Outcome 2 - effectiveness of HIV therapy after one year treatment Outcome 3 - disease stage of patients after one year in HIV related care Outcome 4 - survival of patients recently diagnosed, adjusted by disease stage at diagnosis
Out come 2 - results • Exclusions: pregnant women • National - 2009: - 5% (318)of patients discontinued ARV within 1 year of starting ARV - 15% (834) of patients had virological failure 1 after starting ARV
Number of MSM HIV testing, newly diagnosed and receiving ARV
Summary • One in four diagnosed HIV-infected patients eligible for ARV not receiving it; especially younger patients • 1 in 20 patients starting ARV discontinue it within 12 months • Almost 1 in 7 patients receiving ARV for one year don’t reach VL<50 • A quarter of MSM are undiagnosed (high viral load)