1 / 22

KISA RETREAT

KISA RETREAT. Friday, October 17, 2014. Discussion Items:. District Technology Costs County-wide trend data Comparison to classroom cost trend data Collaborative models. County-wide technology costs.

iona-cleveland
Download Presentation

KISA RETREAT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KISA RETREAT Friday, October 17, 2014

  2. Discussion Items: • District Technology Costs • County-wide trend data • Comparison to classroom cost trend data • Collaborative models

  3. County-wide technology costs Includes 225 (instructional technology) and 284 (non instructional technology) function codes for all twenty districts

  4. Five year trend analysis…

  5. Comparison to other cost centers… Maintenance and Operations -14.25% Fiscal & HR Services -12.60% Office of Principal -6.60% Special Education -5.92% Pupil Transportation -.94% Executive Administration .85% Classroom 4.0% Technology22.32%

  6. 7 Ed Tech Trends 1. 3D Printing

  7. 7 Ed Tech Trends 2. Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)

  8. 7 Ed Tech Trends 3. Big Data

  9. 7 Ed Tech Trends 4. Digital Textbooks

  10. 7 Ed Tech Trends 5. Gamification

  11. 7 Ed Tech Trends 6. Flipped Classroom

  12. 7 Ed Tech Trends 7. Mobile Learning

  13. Final Thoughts… • How do we stay ahead of the technology revolution • How do we stay up with the pace of change in technology • How do Superintendents manage the every changing world of technology, a world they are often not an expert with

  14. Collaboration Committee Goal: Share collaborative work happening around the county in hopes it leads to additional resource sharing

  15. Today’s Shared Service Example: • Technology Consortium July 2009 – three districts started (Comstock Park, Kent City, Sparta) July 2014 – added Cedar Springs • Total student count is 9,700 students

  16. Model Specifics • All technology services done collaboratively with the ISD • Advisory Board made up of local district Superintendent and Business Manager, along with key ISD staff, make decisions and set direction • Cost is $43 per pupil

  17. 7 goals – 7 years • #2 Complete a world class Data Center that will meet industry standards & help Kent ISD become a regional technology provider for customers in the Great Lakes Region. • We delivered: • For the state of Michigan, we lead a consortium of 13 ISDs in the TRIG Grant • We lead a consortium of 7 ISDs with the Data Warehouse • We led a Wide Area Network consortium for our districts, doubling (or more) bandwidth at tremendous cost savings

  18. Consortium Cost Comparison to Peer

  19. Track it work order summary

  20. Infrastructure barometer

  21. Org chart

  22. Thoughts Moving Forward • Technology security – district technology systems are being compromised (hacked), how can we ensure our systems are safe • Technology security audit – is it time for a county-wide technology audit • Technology costs – trending higher than other district costs, including classroom. What can be done to bend or control the cost curve? • Technology needs – how do districts meet the technology needs in their district if unable to pass bond issue

More Related