280 likes | 414 Views
North Dakota Research Accomplishments with EPSCoR/IDeA Support a presentation by Jim Hoehn Senior Associate │ EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation Washington, DC September 29, 2006. 1987. 2001. Idaho Louisiana Mississippi South Dakota. 1985. Hawaii New Mexico. Alabama Kentucky Nevada
E N D
North Dakota Research Accomplishments with EPSCoR/IDeA Support a presentation by Jim Hoehn Senior Associate │ EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation Washington, DC September 29, 2006
1987 2001 Idaho Louisiana Mississippi South Dakota 1985 Hawaii New Mexico Alabama Kentucky Nevada North Dakota Oklahoma Puerto Rico Vermont Wyoming 1980 Arkansas Maine Montana South Carolina West Virginia 2002 1992 U.S. Virgin Islands Kansas Nebraska 2003 Delaware Rhode Island New Hampshire 2000 Alaska Eligible JurisdictionsBy Year of Program Entrance
Characteristics of EPSCoR Jurisdictions Collectively • Population: 20% of nation • Scientists and Engineers: 18% • Doctoral/Research Universities: 25% • NSF R&D Funding: 10% of total • NAEP Performance: 8 of the top 10 States are EPSCoR States • Scholars and Fellows: 22% of Goldwater Scholars; 6% of NSF Graduate Fellows
Average Annual Salary • Number of EPSCoR States in the Top 10 -- 1 (Delaware is #7) • Number of EPSCoR States in the Bottom 10 -- 10; • the bottom 12 are EPSCoR States • Puerto Rico last • Employees in EPSCoR states are paid 81% of employees in non-EPSCoR states U.S. Average - $32,890 Source: The Dynamics of Technology-Based Economic Development 2004
California New York Texas Florida Illinois Pennsylvania New Jersey Ohio Virginia Massachusetts Michigan Georgia Maryland North Carolina Washington Minnesota Missouri Colorado Arizona Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Connecticut South Carolina Alabama Oregon Louisiana Kentucky Kansas Oklahoma Iowa Utah Mississippi Nevada Arkansas New Mexico New Hampshire Nebraska Hawaii Maine Idaho Rhode Island West Virginia District of Montana Delaware Vermont South Dakota North Dakota Alaska Wyoming - 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 7,000.00 8,000.00 Bachelors Degrees in the Workforce • EPSCoR States have 90% of the Bachelors Degree holders in their workforces compared to the Nation • EPSCoR States are a net provider of Bachelor degree holders to other states • This is called the “demographic death spiral” 1999 2004 1994 1999 1994 2004 Source: NSF Science and Engineering Indicators 2006
Consistent Themes Throughout the Life of the EPSCoR Program • State-based • State steering committee • State commitment • Competitive awards with national review • Development within state context • Scientific infrastructure development • Highly focused scientifically
Agents of Change Accomplishments of North Dakota EPSCoR’s Washington, DC Agents: • The EPSCoR/IDeA Coalition • The EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation
EPSCoR/IDeA FoundationBoard • Senior University Officials • Diverse • Agency Expertise • Aggressive Agenda
EPSCoR/IDeA Priorities for FY 2007 • Grow NASA EPSCoR and DEPSCoR • Develop a 15-20 year vision for NSF EPSCoR • Maintain a strong NIH IDeA Program • Better coordinate EPSCoR/IDeA Coalition and Foundation, while preserving separate identity • Increase interaction among various EPSCoR/IDeA constituencies
EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation Accomplishments • NSF EPSCoR Request: $94 million in FY 06 – first time since FY 2000 that NSF requested an increase in EPSCoR funding over the prior year’s congressional appropriation • Workshop: NSF holds “EPSCoR 2020” visionary workshop • Visibility: Foundation increases visibility of EPSCoR/IDeA with top federal officials • NIH Budget: NIH budget holds at $222 million while overall NIH research funding growth ends; no reprogramming of IDeA funds • Agency Interaction: Boards expanded to better interact with ALL EPSCoR/IDeA agencies
Federal R&D Budget Environment for North Dakota’s Researchers
Six-Year Deficit Spending in Billions Source: Congressional Budget Office
FY 1990-2006EPSCoR/IDeA Funding FY 1990 Base $8 million FY 2006 Enacted $367 million FY 2007 Goal $442 million
EPSCoR states received 10% of NSF research awards, and 9% of research dollars in 2002. * Includes competitive award, supplements, and continuing grant increments. Proposals and Awards Source: NSF Budget Internet Information System (BIIS) Funding Rate tables. Funding for All Actions Sources: BIIS Award and Summary tables. EPSCoR jurisdictions include those in program prior to 1996: AL, AR, ID, KY, LA, KS, ME, MT, MS, NE, NV, ND, OK, PR, SC, SD, VT, WV, WY Comparison of All Jurisdictions and NSF EPSCoR JurisdictionsPercent Change in NSF Research Directorates and Offices from 1996 to 2002 Percent Change
ND EPSCoR Achievements Indications that EPSCoR is transforming the science and technology infrastructure of ND: • Increases in the number of Ph.D-level scientists & engineers • Increased in the proposal submission rates for merit-based grants and contracts • Increases in the proposal “success rate” for merit-based grants and contracts • North Dakota EPSCoR increasingly influences AURA/STTAR students’ choice of science and technology careers • Enhancing the productivity and profitability of North Dakota’s existing technology based businesses • Facilitating the establishment of new high-technology businesses
Examples of ND EPSCoR’s Achievements • The state's overall investment of $24.3million has resulted in over $169million in external awards to EPSCoR-supported researchers since 1986 • The $100 million awarded to EPSCoR-supported researchers since 1986 has had over a $230 million total impact on the economy of North Dakota
Example of ND IDeA’s Achievements 20:1 Return on Investment • NIH’s Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE)research cluster faculty supported by North Dakota EPSCoR and matching funds from the state of North Dakota have generated federal grant income over 20 times the initial investment.
EPSCoR 2020 Workshop EPSCoR 2020: Expanding State Participation in Research in the 21st Century – A New Vision for the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research • Date: June 15-16, 2006 • PI: Jerry Odom • Location: Arlington, VA • Purpose: “…to look 10-20 years into the future and think strategically about investments that will be needed to create the national research capacity that [NSF] would like to achieve – a new vision for EPSCoR.”
Strategic Priorities • Provide more Flexible RII awards • increase size and duration of RII grants • Increase geographical dispersion of funding and participation • Relocate EPSCoR program to OIA • Revitalize and extend other components of EPSCoR • Co-funding • Planning grants • Outreach • Restore “experimental” nature of EPSCoR • Use program as testbed • Develop state strategic S&T business plans • Accountability • Create shared understanding and definition of success
Issues and Challenges • Accountability • Attribution • Program Flexibility • Linkage to Emerging Federal Priorities (ACI and Gathering Storm) • Tight Budget Scenario • State S&T plans and Investments in S/T