1 / 97

Improving auditory skills through training

Improving auditory skills through training. Beverly A. Wright. Northwestern University Knowles Hearing Center. Types of learning. Types of learning. Declarative (Explicit, Conscious). Facts and Events. Fact. Event. Types of learning. Declarative (Explicit, Conscious).

isanne
Download Presentation

Improving auditory skills through training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improving auditory skills through training Beverly A. Wright Northwestern University Knowles Hearing Center

  2. Types of learning

  3. Types of learning Declarative (Explicit, Conscious) Facts and Events Fact Event

  4. Types of learning Declarative (Explicit, Conscious) Non-declarative (Implicit, Non-Conscious) Facts and Events Fact Event

  5. Types of learning Declarative (Explicit, Conscious) Non-declarative (Implicit, Non-Conscious) Skills Facts and Events Fact Event

  6. Types of learning Declarative (Explicit, Conscious) Non-declarative (Implicit, Non-Conscious) Skills Facts and Events Fact Event Motor

  7. Types of learning Declarative (Explicit, Conscious) Non-declarative (Implicit, Non-Conscious) Skills Facts and Events Perceptual Fact Event Motor

  8. Types of learning Declarative (Explicit, Conscious) Non-declarative (Implicit, Non-Conscious) Skills Facts and Events Perceptual Fact Event Motor

  9. Perceptual learning

  10. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss

  11. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss Learning mechanisms

  12. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss More effective training strategies Learning mechanisms

  13. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss More effective training strategies Learning mechanisms

  14. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss More effective training strategies Learning mechanisms Learning on basic tasks

  15. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss More effective training strategies Learning mechanisms Learning on wide array of tasks Learning on basic tasks

  16. Perceptual learning Treatment option for hearing loss More effective training strategies Learning mechanisms Learning on wide array of tasks Learning on basic tasks

  17. Basic task

  18. Basic task: Frequency discrimination Standard Signal Frequency difference Frequency Time Which pair of tones has the lower frequency (pitch)?

  19. Basic task: Frequency discrimination Standard Signal Frequency difference Frequency Time Which pair of tones has the lower frequency (pitch)?

  20. Basic task: Frequency discrimination Standard Signal Frequency difference Frequency Time Which pair of tones has the lower frequency (pitch)?

  21. Basic task: Frequency discrimination Standard Signal Frequency difference Frequency Time Which pair of tones has the lower frequency (pitch)?

  22. Basic task: Frequency discrimination Standard Signal Frequency difference Frequency Time Which pair of tones has the lower frequency (pitch)?

  23. Basic task: Frequency discrimination Standard Signal Frequency difference Frequency Time Which pair of tones has the lower frequency (pitch)?

  24. Principles of perceptual learning

  25. Just do it

  26. Freq Δf Time Just do it Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  27. Freq Δf Time Just do it Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  28. Freq Δf Time Just do it Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  29. Freq Δf Time Just do it Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) 95% confidence interval of control post-test performance Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  30. Freq Δf Time Just do it Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) 95% confidence interval of control post-test performance Significant improvement (trained>none) Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  31. Freq Δf Time Just do it Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  32. Freq Δf Time Just do it Trained on Interval Discrimination Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Δt Freq Time Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  33. Freq Δf Time Just do it Trained on Interval Discrimination Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Δt Freq Time Tested on Frequency Discrimination Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  34. Freq Δf Time Just do it Trained on Interval Discrimination Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) Δt Freq Time Tested on Frequency Discrimination Better None Freq Interval Trained task Wright, Sabin, Zhang, Marrone & Fitzgerald (2010)J.Neuroscience

  35. Just do it Visual Learning • Karni & Sagi, 1991 • Shiu & Pashler, 1992 • Treisman et al., 1992 • Ahissar & Hochstein, 1993 • Levi & Polat, 1996 • Crist et al., 1997 • Fahle, 1997 • Sigman & Gilbert, 2000 • Meinhardt, 2002 • Meinhardt & Grabbe, 2002

  36. Just do it

  37. Just do it Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  38. Just do it Task performance Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  39. Just do it Task performance Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  40. Just do it Task performance selection Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  41. Just do it Task performance selection sensitization Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  42. Practice, practice, practice

  43. Freq Δf Time Practice, practice, practice Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) 15.8 12.5 10 Better 0 360 900 # training trials/day for 6 days Wright, & Sabin (2007)Exp. Brain. Res.

  44. Freq Δf Time Practice, practice, practice Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) 15.8 12.5 10 Better 0 360 900 # training trials/day for 6 days Wright, & Sabin (2007)Exp. Brain. Res.

  45. Freq Δf Time Practice, practice, practice Worse Adjusted post-training threshold (Hz) 15.8 12.5 10 Better 0 360 900 # training trials/day for 6 days Wright, & Sabin (2007)Exp. Brain. Res.

  46. Practice, practice, practice • chevron discrimination (Aberg & Herzog, 2010) • letter enumeration (Hauptmann and Karni, 2002; Hauptmann et al., 2005)

  47. Practice, practice, practice

  48. Practice, practice, practice Task performance selection sensitization Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  49. Practice, practice, practice Task performance selection sensitization Mechanism A Frequency Mechanism C Duration Mechanism B Intensity

  50. Practice, practice, practice Training per day More Less No Learning Learning Learning threshold Effect Training

More Related