1 / 110

How the Super Circular Will Change Grant Administration

How the Super Circular Will Change Grant Administration. Presented by Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq . lmanasevit@bruman.com Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013. Why “Supercircular”???. Greater simplicity Greater consistency Obama Executive Order on Regulatory Review – 2011

ishi
Download Presentation

How the Super Circular Will Change Grant Administration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How the Super Circular Will Change Grant Administration Presented byLeigh M. Manasevit, Esq.lmanasevit@bruman.comBrustein & Manasevit, PLLCFall Forum 2013

  2. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Why “Supercircular”??? • Greater simplicity • Greater consistency • Obama Executive Order on Regulatory Review – 2011 • Increase efficiency • Strengthen oversight

  3. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC • Greater “simplicity” means elimination of several compliance elements in the Compliance Supplement, including: • Equipment Management • MOE/Ear-Marking • Procurement • Program Income

  4. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC What is covered? • Administrative Requirements (A-102, A-110) • Cost Principles (A-87, A-21, A-122) • Audit Requirements (A-133)

  5. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Who is covered? • All non-federal entities expending federal awards

  6. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC When is it effective? • NPRM – 2/1/13 • Close of comment period – 05/02/13 • Analysis of public comment • Final regulation – not likely before 1/1/14 • EDGAR revisions – within one year of final regulation? • No splitting FY

  7. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC When is it effective?Part 2 • BUT SEE highly critical comments of Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE)

  8. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC A Battle Over the Future Direction of Federal Grants ManagementOMB vs. OIG

  9. Who? What? Why? When? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  10. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Who? • OMB did not issue 2/1/13 NPRM (Super Circular) in vacuum • Drafters from Council of Finance Assistance Reform (COFAR) HHS, ED, DOL, NSF, AG, HS, DOT, HUD, Energy

  11. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Who? • But did “COFAR” include “CIGIE”? • Council of Inspectors General for Integrity and Efficiency • 20 Federal Agencies 94% of $1.2 trillion in direct federal awards covered by A-133

  12. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Why? • OIG Goal: • Promote accountability • Eliminate fraud, waste, abuse and improper payments

  13. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Why? • Because goals are not aligned, OIG disagrees, strongly disagrees, and extremely disagrees with many of the proposed OMB changes

  14. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC When? • Prediction: The OIG comments will either delay the final regulation or result in issuance of new NPRM

  15. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC When? • EDGAR must be revised within 12 months of final regulation • Since changes must be prospective, effective date may be 7/1/16, not 7/1/15

  16. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Certifications 1st Battleground

  17. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMB Proposal • Eliminate reference to PARs • Now “Certified Reports” • Reports may be electronic • Semi-Annual for single cost objective – same

  18. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Management • After the fact, unless mutually satisfactory alternative approved by awarding agency • Certification periods cannot exceed 12 months • Activities may be expressed as percentages

  19. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Management • At postsecondary level, “reliance may be placed on estimates in which a degree of tolerance is appropriate

  20. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Management • Certified Reports on 2 or more cost objectives certified by employee or individual responsible for verification

  21. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Management • No additional support other than certification is necessary

  22. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Management • Substitute systems may be used if approved by cognizant agency • Federal agencies are encouraged to approve alternative proposals based on outcomes

  23. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Time and Effort Management • Awarding agencies may approve “blended funding” where multiple programs are involved and “performance-oriented metrics” are used

  24. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal – Certifications • All certifications must reference consequences of false certification • By signing this report… I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information, or the omission of any material fact may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties.

  25. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Any relaxation of time and effort rules would have “significant detrimental impact on government’s ability to protect from fraud, waste, abuse, improper payments.”

  26. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • NPRM proposed standards “would seriously undermine our community’s ability to identify and question unallowable and even fraudulent charges.”

  27. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Do not issue final rule until results from four national pilot projects are considered

  28. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • OMB should provide uniform language: • Time charged reflects time actually worked on project • Alerts signer that he/she is subject to federal laws on submission of false information

  29. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Retain A-87 language: • “Where employees work on multiple activities or cost objectives, a distribution of their salaries or wages will be supported by personnel activity reports or equivalent documentation.”

  30. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Payroll distributions are based on budget estimates that do not focus on actual activity

  31. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • 12 month certifications do not provide adequate oversight it is too extensive a period for persons to identify actual activity performed (unless supported by additional source documentation)

  32. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Drop phrase “mutually satisfactory alternative” in lieu of “after the fact certifications.” According to OIG, there are “no mutually satisfactory alternatives.”

  33. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • How would quarterly adjustments be validated using 12 month certifications?

  34. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Certifications from supervisory personnel must include review of labor distribution reports to ensure effort being charged is reasonable.

  35. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Time and Effort • Charges for salaries and wages of nonprofessional employees (old A-21) must be supported by records that include time on tasks • Substitute systems must contain sufficient detail to be useful for audit purposes

  36. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Employee Morale, Health and Welfare Costs 2nd Battleground

  37. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Employee Morale • A-87 / A-21 currently allows for expenses incurred in accordance with the entity’s “established practice or custom for the improvement of working conditions, employer – employee relations, employee morale”

  38. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMB - Proposal • No Change

  39. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal - Employee Morale • Do not allow expenses for recipient’s established practices could result in purchase of: • Groceries • Pizza parties • Toiletries • T-shirts • Gifts • Jewelry • Flowers • Balloons • Funds must be closely related to grant purposes

  40. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Food / Meetings / Conferences 3 way battle OMB / OIG / ED ? ? ? ? 3rd Battleground

  41. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Current Law: A-87 / A-21 • Costs of meals and transportation if primary purpose of meeting / conference is dissemination of technical information

  42. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMB Proposal • Cost of Meetings • Costs from meetings and conferences “beyond the recipient entity” are allowable

  43. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMB Proposal • Travel Costs • Grantee must retain documentation • Participation of individual is necessary to the federal award • Costs are reasonable and consistent with entity’s established travel policy

  44. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Cost Principle Changes • Travel • If no institutional travel policy, GSA rates apply -48 CFR 31.205

  45. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal – Meetings and Conferences • OIGs have found conferences held by recipients where per-person cost of daily catering was between 189% and 400% of applicable location’s federal per diem for meals and incidental expenses

  46. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OIG Rebuttal – Meetings and Conferences • OMB should limit meal costs to federal per diem rates and document a cost comparison of at least three sites to determine most cost-advantageous location

  47. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC New ED Guidance on Using Federal Funds for Conferences and Meetings • Very high burden of proof to show that paying for food is necessary • Grantee should structure agenda so there is time for participants to purchase own food; use location with easy access to food

  48. Grantees should not use grant funds to pay for food and beverages for receptions and networking sessions Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  49. When grantees contract with a hotel, food and beverage costs should be “backed out” Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

  50. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Single Audit Thresholds 4th Battleground

More Related