1 / 21

Trigger simulation for 2004-2005

Trigger simulation for 2004-2005. Trigger data quality Calorimeter trigger threshold calibration DC trigger threshold calibration. LNF, 1 Feb 2006 M.Palutan and B.Sciascia for the Trigger group. Trigger data quality critical issues:

ishmael-zamora
Download Presentation

Trigger simulation for 2004-2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trigger simulation for 2004-2005 • Trigger data quality • Calorimeter trigger threshold calibration • DC trigger threshold calibration LNF, 1 Feb 2006 M.Palutan and B.Sciascia for the Trigger group

  2. Trigger data quality • critical issues: • hardware errors from TORTA board  CALO trigger information in the decision board is not compatible with what observed at the sector’s level • bad RF signal from DAFNE  some clocks are lost by the RF/4-T1 sinch. chain  wrong event-t0, bad calo time resolution. • missing veto at injection (not critical, possibly higher bkg) • results: • list of “bad” runs

  3. Summary: All runs 2004 2005 N-A NOT-reco reco (nb-1) (nb-1) (nb-1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Torta-bad OR (t0-bad>0.01%) 101 182509157 NO-inj-veto 0 75511980 NO physmon info 48 3024 12580 Rejected DB2 flag (No-INJ) • Updated run list ready

  4. Data quality vs run number 2004 2004 Not-Reco Not-Reco 2005 2005 2004 2004 Reco Reco 2005 2005 Bad trigger conditions No PHYSMON info

  5. Calorimeter trigger threshold calibration • Control samples: • Kcrash+autoTRG • + KS p0p0 (“photons”) • + KSp+p (“pions”) • Single sector threshold evaluation for data and MC • 2004-2005 data set divided in 20 periods of about 100 pb-1 • according to main HW interventions and machine stops. • Results: • Comparison of Data and MC photon thresholds  MC thr settings (already in DB2).

  6. Photons on the barrel (before calibration) Th(MeV)  5% data MC data/MC Z(cm) Th(MeV)  5% Z(cm)

  7. Photons on the barrel (after calibration) Th(MeV) Data MC data/MC Z(cm) Th(MeV) Z(cm)

  8. Photons on the EndCaps (after calibration) data MC data/MC Th(MeV) Th(MeV) Y(cm) Y(cm) Th(MeV) Th(MeV) Y(cm) Y(cm)

  9. East Photon trigger sector multiplicity data Barrel MC < d  1% West

  10. Pion trigger sector multiplicity East data Barrel MC d  2-3% West

  11. MC efficiency spread for a +/- 5% overall threshold drift p0p0p0 KSp0p0 p+p-p0 d 0.5% Ke3 Km3 KL decay

  12. MC efficiency spread for a +/- 5% overall threshold drift KSp+p- p0p0p0 p+p-p0 d 1% Ke3 Km3 KL decay

  13. Cosmic veto barrel multiplicity Photons Pions Barrel data Barrel MC

  14. DC trigger threshold calibration • Control sample: • Kcrash+autoTRG + KSp+p • DC trigger efficiency on events triggered by CALO, evaluated on Data and MC. • 2004-2005 data set divided in 20 periods of about 100 pb-1 • according to main HW interventions and machine stops. • Results: • Comparison of Data and MC DC trigger efficiency  MC DC2 thr settings (already in DB2).

  15. Data DC2 efficiency vs data taking periods MC DC2 efficiency scan vs threshold applied in MC DC2 Efficiency DC2 Efficiency 1 DC2thr  0.5 % 2004 2005 DC2thr Data period 70 75 80 85

  16. Spares

  17. TORTA hardware errors

  18. Bad RF/4

  19. Injection veto

  20. Summary (RUN_NR  36 904, 30/05/05) N-A NOT-reco reco # of run (nb-1) (nb-1) (nb-1) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO phystrig info 102 4416 14750 194 Torta-bad OR (t0-bad>0.1%) 101 172702193 121 …+ (t0-bad>0.01%) 0. 843 6308 36 … + NO-inj-veto 0. 63311050 83 • Run list ready

  21. Data quality vs run number Bad trigger conditions No PHYSMON info

More Related