1 / 25

e +

ACTAR WORKSHOP BORDEAUX. e +. From: Particle Physics Big is beautiful To: Nuclear Physics Small is mignon. David Robert Nygren Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory First TPC 1978 PEP-4 detector, e + e - at SLAC. ACTAR Workshop.

ismail
Download Presentation

e +

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACTAR WORKSHOPBORDEAUX e+ Emanuel Pollacco

  2. From: Particle Physics Big is beautiful To: Nuclear Physics Small is mignon David Robert Nygren Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory First TPC 1978 PEP-4 detector, e+e- at SLAC. Emanuel Pollacco

  3. ACTAR Workshop • A workshop to provide the international NUCLEAR PHYSICS community with an electronic instrumentation for Time Projection Chambers. • General Electronics for TPC: GET • Possible extension to other instrumentation. • A workshop for Engineers & Physicists organized by Engineers. Emanuel Pollacco Emanuel Pollacco

  4. Multi-Project & Multi-Laboratory • ACTAR • Darsebury, GANIL, Santiago, Saclay, CENBG… • CENBG • Saclay • R3B collaboration • MSU • RIKEN Project General Electronics for TPC (GET) • Covers Front End Electronics to DAQ Most Projects Lab1 Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 Project GET Projects Lab1 Lab2 Lab3 Lab4 ACTAR MSU-TPC R3B Emanuel Pollacco CENBG-TPC

  5. Conceptual Phase Drawing Specifications Conceptual Design Building Pro-type Testing Pro-type Construction Phase Building of units Testing of units Organization Organigram Partitioning of Tasks Who will construct (S&H) what? Milestones Budget Who will pay for what? Who is going to ask for what? ANR, … Adopt Budget Model What should YOU be doing at Bordeaux? “ Nuclear Physics Needs A multi-project => multi-design => multi-requirements ==>Scale-Free Through-Put & Ch. N° NOT USUAL! Emanuel Pollacco

  6. Must Construct an Organigram Work Packages? To inscribe in? A Discussion with conclusions before we are leave Bordeaux. Emanuel Pollacco

  7. When are our target dates for the experiments? • Availability of manpower? • Budget constrains? • Have numbers for Wednesday morning. j Emanuel Pollacco

  8. Budget Model • How are we going to pay for this project? • When do you expect to have a response from the financial body? • How are we to share the costs? • Please prepare a slide for discussion on Wednesday morning. Emanuel Pollacco Emanuel Pollacco

  9. Some suggestions Emanuel Pollacco Emanuel Pollacco

  10. Other Instrumentation Bardelli ACTAR Workshop Ljubljana 2008 • To what can we apply the GET electronics apart from TPC oriented instrumentation? • Complete or Partial applications? • Ge (higher resolution-HiSPEC/FAIR) • Si for particle ID (high sampling-GASPARD, HYDE, EXL) • Bragg detectors (VAMOS/GANIL) • RDT (MUSETT-VAMOS/GANIL) • … • Is GET DAQ a possible “standard” for high data through-put for GANIL? What must we do to make it so? Emanuel Pollacco Emanuel Pollacco

  11. Front End Electronics & DAC D A T A F L O W • Detector – Electronics interface. • Data Registering • Amplification/Digitizers • Data Concentrators • Data Selection (Trigger) • Compression • Event Processing • Data Registering • Event Builders • Routers • Data Control (Detector & Electronics) Network-Based • Run Control • Data Flow Control • OnLine Monitoring • Parameter Control • Test Functions/Diagnostics • Calibration Online Control • Control Management • I assume that physicists have thought of:- • Different modes of data taking • Calibration, Trigger, Detector ensemble • Analysis Criteria&Specifications • Resolution, dynamic range, through-put, … Emanuel Pollacco

  12. Detector: Radiation environment Electro - mechanics gating grid • “Topology” of the electronics will depend significantly on the electro-mechanics layout • Integrated amplification stage, with spark protection: • with 20 μm resistive layer, silicon survives breakdowns now anode wire Spark Protection Pre-Amp A-A ADC Discussion Tomorrow CoBo NIKEFF DAQ Emanuel Pollacco

  13. End CAP TPC Detector: Radiation environment What "Topology"? anode wire gating grid Spark Protection Spark Protection Spark Protection Spark Protection Discussion Tomorrow Pre-Amp A-A ADC A-A A-A : ASIC+ADC card CoBo: COmpression BOard A-A ADC A-A ADC Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay CoBo CoBo CoBo ADC CoBo DAQ DAQ DAQ DAQ Emanuel Pollacco Options A B C D

  14. FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB CoBo A-A ADC TPC Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay Spark Protection Need for a CONTROL Strategy A-A ADC • CoBo– FPGA – Memory – Optic Links • Data Compression • Base-line Computation • Computation of time, energy and shape • Choice of algorithms • Temporary Storage • Optic link transfer • Board Cooling • Trigger Options By • Sector/Event Shape/Multiplicity • … • FPGA - Control • Temperature • Slow Control Relay • Data Transfer • Dead time etc • Optic link transfer • … CoBo Control DAQ B Emanuel Pollacco

  15. Signal 0 Data Concentration Base Line adjustment? Zero removal? Time Calibration & Time Stamp? Charge? … What is the latency for a give given FPGA for all these calculations? Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay Where shall we do the data reduction? In CoBo? Some work has been done. Information & Discussion needed. A-A 288 ch A-A 288 ch A-A 288 ch A-A 288 ch S Disc CoBo 1152 ch A S Disc ADC A FPGA S Disc ADC A ADC ADC Scale-Free ? N(A-A)/channels = 1, 2, … N(A-A)/N(Cobo) = 1, 2 or … 8 N(CoBo)/N(PCI-Express) = 3, 2 or 1 PCI-EXPRESS Emanuel Pollacco

  16. End-Cap Spark Protection Spark Protection Spark Protection Spark Protection Pre-Amp A-A* Pre-Amp Pre-Amp A-A** ADC A-A** ADC Pre-Amp A-A** ADC A-A** ADC A-A** ADC A-A** ADC A-A*** ADC A-A** ADC A-A ADC A-A ADC A-A ADC A-A ADC ROD** CoBo CoBo* CoBo*** CoBo** ROD CoBo CoBo 6 6 6 6 EVENT BUILDER DAQ • Possible System • External & Internal Trigger • Scale Free Architecture • Number of Channels • Through-Put • Data Treatment Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay Emanuel Pollacco

  17. End-Cap Si Spark Protection Spark Protection Spark Protection Spark Protection Pre-Amp A-A* Pre-Amp Pre-Amp A-A** ADC Pre-Amp A-A** ADC A-A** ADC A-A** ADC A-A ADC A-A ADC A-A ADC A-A ADC ROD** CoBo CoBo* CoBo** CoBo ROD 6 CoBo 6 6 EVENT BUILDER DAQ Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay Do we have an agreed upon timing-diagram (at least)? It will be useful ... Emanuel Pollacco

  18. A Trigger Architecture Inspect What do we want for this? B5 B6 B7 B8 TRIGGER Logic Unit A-A 288 ch Some work has been done. Discussion needed. B0 B1 B2 B3 B4 A-A 288 ch A-A 288 ch CoBo 1152 ch A-A 288 ch S Disc A4 A S Disc S Disc A3 A S Disc A2 A S Disc A1 Inspect A1 A0 Emanuel Pollacco

  19. END Emanuel Pollacco

  20. How Long? How Much €? • Development • How long for an AFTER+ - 2 FTE • How long for a A-A – 2.5 FTE • How long for a FEM – 2.5 FTE • How long for a DCC – 4.0 FTE • Total 9 FTE • Production • Testing  you will do it, no? Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay Emanuel Pollacco

  21. ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC 6,400 pads 6,400 pads ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ASIC-on-Pad? MAPS? DREAM-Land? 64 pads 2x2mm² 16 mm 160 mm Emanuel Pollacco

  22. FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB FEB CoBo A-A ADC TPC Emanuel Pollacco, CEA Saclay Spark Protection A-A ADC • Control • Temperature • Slow Control Confirmation • Signal Visualization • Cooling • Security Automat parameters • … • … • A-A – AFTER + ADC + Pulser + Multiplicity … • 288 ch/A-A • Multiplicity sum for 1152 channels • Event Pattern • Board cooling • Calibration • Ext & Int - Pulsers • Time, Energy & Shape • Slow Control • Dics Level • Gain • Shape • … Work to be Done. Set Task & Date. CoBo Control DAQ B Emanuel Pollacco

  23. €€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€€ Need to have slide: • Need To Make Estimates of the Engineering Times involved. • Need to Make Estimates of the fixed costs involved. • From 1 & 2 we can obtain Price/Channel. Provide a bases for the individual demands to the different authorities. • The Contribution in engineering time will be reduced from the final bill. • Travel costs etc – to be paid by each laboratory. • The final bill – how do we pay for it? • Proportional to the number of channels? • A fixed cost part + the number of channels? • We pool all the money together … ? • Common funding from say ANR? • Need to have a kitty or money pool to perform the developments. Emanuel Pollacco

  24. Drift Time for Hydrogen Emanuel Pollacco

  25. Costing Exercise • Engineering Costs • Software & Hardware • Fixed Costs • Items Considered:- • AGET (AFTER+) • A-A (FEC+) • CoBo (FEM+) • Router (DCC+) • Engineering costs for Industrialized Production • Testing – done by the laboratory in question • Facilities on card & bench test to allow this procedure • AGET – not included Spark Protection A-A ADC CoBo Router Emanuel Pollacco

More Related