1 / 22

Fabio La Franca and N. Sacchi, S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, C. Gruppioni, C. Feruglio et al.

The nature and density of Spitzer selected X-ray absorbed AGN: Identification of sources with large MIR/Optical ratios in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1. Fabio La Franca and N. Sacchi, S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, C. Gruppioni, C. Feruglio et al. Dipartimento di Fisica. Universita` degli Studi ROMA TRE.

ismail
Download Presentation

Fabio La Franca and N. Sacchi, S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, C. Gruppioni, C. Feruglio et al.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The nature and density of Spitzer selected X-ray absorbed AGN: Identification of sources with large MIR/Optical ratios in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 Fabio La Franca and N. Sacchi, S. Puccetti, F. Fiore, C. Gruppioni, C. Feruglio et al. Dipartimento di Fisica Universita` degli Studi ROMA TRE

  2. QUESTIONS -What is the fraction of AGN among the sources with large MIR/O? -What is the fraction of absorbed AGN? -Is the density of absorbed AGN compatible to other estimates or extrapolations (i.e. XLF)?

  3. What do we know about the AGN evolution? A Luminosity Dependent Density Evolution (LDDE) for X-ray AGN is observed (e.g. Ueda+03; Fiore+03; La Franca+05; Barger+05; Hasinger+05; Gilli+07; Silverman+07; Della Ceca+08) Lower luminosity AGN peak at lower redshifts: DOWNSIZING (see models of galaxy and AGN formations) La Franca+05

  4. INCREASE WITH THE REDSHIFT DECREASE WITH LUMINOSITY Earlier evidences of a decrease of the fraction of absorbed AGN with luminosity from Lawrence & Elvis (1982), confirmed by Ueda et al. (2003). What do we know about the AGN evolution? The fraction of absorbed AGN as function of LX and z assumed *) expected Fraction of Absorbed AGN La Franca+05 *) Assuming no luminosity and redshift dependences

  5. ~1x10-15@2Ms ? The LX-z plane Many studies indicate that the majority of the sources with extreme F(24um)/F(R) (e.g. >1000) ratios are obscured/absorbed AGNs (see e.g. Martinez-Sansigre+05; Houck+05; Weedman+06; Brown+06; Polletta+06; Yan+07; Daddi+07; Fiore+08; Georgantopoulos+08…) X-ray stacking analysis of MIR selected AGNs allows to probe more distand, more absorbed, lower luminosity, regions of the LX-NH-z plane However, 1) these sources are so faint, that direct optical spectroscopic classifications is available for very few of them; 2) the density estimates are based on assumptions on the NH distribution.

  6. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field Method: data AREA 0.6 deg2(:0.5h, :-43.5o) IMAGING BVRIz (PI Franceschini; Berta+06+08) JK (PI Cimatti/Maiolino; Dias+08) SWIRE (PI Lonsdale & Rowan-Robinson) (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8.0 and 24 μm) X-ray (PI: Fiore) by XMM 4x100Ks (Puccetti+06) Chandra x5 (Puccetti in prep) SPECTROSCOPY (PI La Franca; Sacchi in prep) ~100 hours with VIMOS and FORS2@VLT Total~1500 Zs (R<24.5) (K, 3.6um and 24um sources) Catalogue of ~1700 24m sources with F24 > 0.280 mJy Redshift for 384 sources with R<24.2

  7. Adapted from Polletta et al. (2007) Red Power Law ~AGN1 (SED:1-6) Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field Method: SED templates fitting ULIRG/Starburst (SED: 7-9) Seyfert2/AGN2 (SED:10-13) Spirals Star Forming (SED:14-20) Ellipticals (SED:21)

  8. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field Method: SED templates fitting (see Polletta et al. 2007) 1stchoice 2ndchoice 3rdchoice AGN2 AGN1 χ2 best fit analysis Normal Normal SED

  9. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field SED classification of high MIR/O sources

  10. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field SED classification of high MIR/O sources

  11. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field SED classification of high MIR/O sources

  12. 20% Local relationship un-absorbed AGN 43% 34% 3% Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field SED classification of high MIR/O sources What is the fraction/density of (possibly absorbed) AGN among these high MIR/O sources? First look at the OPT spectra…

  13. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field OPTICAL VLT SPECTROSCOPY of faint (R>22) high MIR/O sources TOTAL: 384 spectra

  14. Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field OPTICAL VLT SPECTROSCOPY of faint (R>22) high MIR/O sources composite spectra TOTAL: 384 spectra

  15. 40% AGN2 (& AGN1) 60% ELG 56 spectra Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field OPTICAL VLT SPECTROSCOPY of faint (R>22) high MIR/O sources composite spectra TOTAL: 384 spectra What about their SED? 82% of SED-PWL are optical AGN 93% of SED-ULIRG are optical ELG SED-Seyfert2: no preferences

  16. X-ray detections and stacking (filled symbols) STACKED DATA Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field X-ray stacking analysys of faint (R>22) high MIR/O sources 82% of OPT-AGN are X-ray absorbed AGN 85% of OPT-ELG are mildly X-ray absorbed with L2-10~1041-42 MID TERM SUMMARY: SED-PWL --> optical AGN(2) --> X-ray absorbed AGN SED-ULIRG --> optical ELG --> mildly absorbed low LX

  17. Spec. and phot. redshifts Spec. and phot. redshifts Analysis for ∆z=0.6-1.3* i.e. ∆LogL24=44-45.5 *) At z>1.3 the sample is incomplete becouse of fainter R>25 unindentified sources Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field SED classification of high MIR/O sources The sources with F24/FR>120 have z>0.6 and LogL24>44

  18. X-ray detections and stacking (filled symbols) Low MIR/O sources show low LX and mild absorption, compatible with absorbed X-ray spectra of strong star-forming galaxies Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field X-ray properties of low MIR/O sources

  19. SOFT 0.3-1.5 keV HARD 1.5-6 keV X-ray detections and stacking (filled symbols) R>25 SED-SEY2 SED-Red PWL 73% of large MIR/O (F24/R>120) sources are absorbed AGN Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field X-ray properties of high MIR/O sources What are their densities?…

  20. LogNH~22.3 LogNH~23.1 Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field Density of X-ray absorbed large MIR/O sources The density is compatible with the extrapolations coming from previous estimates at z~1 of the XLF of Compton thin AGN

  21. ~1x10-15@2Ms ? We have probed a one decade less luminous region at z~1 or a 0.7 larger redshift at LogL2-10~42.5 Looking for absorbed AGN in the XMM/SWIRE/ELAIS-S1 field Density of X-ray absorbed large MIR/O sources

  22. SUMMARY • We have carried out optical spectroscopic identification of 56 sources • with F24/R>120 and R<24.2. • - The fraction of optically classified (or X-ray luminous) AGN is 40(45)%. • SED-PWL --> optical AGN(2) --> X-ray absorbed AGN • SED-ULIRG --> optical ELG --> mildly absorbed, low LX • -According to the X-ray stacking analysis, 73% of the sources are absorbed • (22<LogNH<23.5) AGN with Log(L2-10)>42 cgs. • -Their density is compatible with the extrapolations at z~1 of the XLF • of Compton thin AGN.

More Related