130 likes | 142 Views
OPS IMP Inspection Process. Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Paul Wood August 7, 2001. OPS Process Implemented in Stages. Initial Review Focused on Presence of Framework Containing All Program Elements Appropriate Decision Processes
E N D
OPS IMP Inspection Process Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Paul Wood August 7, 2001
OPS Process Implemented in Stages • Initial Review Focused on Presence of Framework Containing All Program Elements • Appropriate Decision Processes • Reasonable Plan for Improvement • Success in Initial Review will not Imply Long-Term “Acceptability”of Operator’s Process
OPS Process Implemented in Stages, cont. • Subsequent Reviews will Examine Operator Performance against “Roadmap” in Framework • Will Examine Improvements in the Process
Comprehensive Review of Baseline Assessment Plan & IM Framework Objectives: • Inspect for Compliance with Requirements of Baseline Assessment Plan and IM Framework • Promote Continuous Improvement
Features of Inspection Process • Focused at Company Level (Not Region-by-Region) • Separate from Normal Compliance Inspections • Multi-Discipline, Multi-Region Teams will Conduct Inspections • Reasonable Team Size Requires Focused State Participation
Inspection Process Issues • Evaluation Basis & Consistency • The Inspection Process Itself • Team Composition & Expertise • Nature of Feedback to Operators • Schedule • Enforcement (Addressed Later by Chris Hoidal)
Evaluation Basis & Consistency • Criteria being Developed to Guide Evaluation of Performance-Based Aspects • Examine Operator Data Collection & Analysis Process • Examine Operator Analytical Processes • Examine Effectiveness of Operator Processes • Criteria will Evolve with Time & Allow Some Implementation Flexibility • Quality Documentation of Inspection Results is Essential to Support Follow-up Inspections.
Inspector Expertise • Pipeline Design & Operations • Assessment/Inspection Technology • Management Systems & Processes • Risk Analysis Methods
Type of OPS Feedback to Operators • Direct Operator to Modify Program to Address Clear Deficiencies • Identify Aspects of Process or Tools to Consider Modifying • Encourage Operator to Consider Adopting “Noteworthy Practices” • Promote Consideration of Use of Demonstrated New Technologies
OPS Inspection of Operator IM Program Implementation • Confirmation of Integrity Assessments • Confirmation of Repairs • Review of “Notifications” • Review of Assessment Results and Integration with Other Data • Review Basis for Repair Method Selection and Schedule
OPS Inspection of Operator IM Program Implementation, Cont. • Review Operator Risk Analysis and Determination of Need for Additional Risk Controls (e.g., EFRDs and leak detection enhancements) • Review Basis for Re-assessment Method Selection and Schedule • IM Program Development • Operator’s Internal Performance Evaluation
Separate vs Integrated Inspection • Some Aspects could be Integrated with Standard Inspections • Other Aspects may be Better Performed in Separate, In-depth Inspections • Expect Evolution from Entirely Separate Inspections to Largely Integrated with Standard Inspections
Scheduling On-going IM Program Implementation Inspections • Base Frequency on Results of Inspection of Comprehensive Plan and Framework • Program Maturity and Quality • Operator Performance • Progress in Implementing Assessment Plan • May Involve Multiple Company Locations • Complete One Round of IM Program Implementation Inspections by 9/30/04 (for large liquid operators)