450 likes | 671 Views
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 5- Part I Hardy- Weinberg Equilibrium. The Hardy-Weinberg-Castle Equilibrium. The Hardy-Weinberg-Castle Equilibrium. Godfrey Hardy. Wilhelm Weinberg. William Castle. Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle. Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle
E N D
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 5- Part I Hardy- Weinberg Equilibrium
The Hardy-Weinberg-Castle Equilibrium Godfrey Hardy Wilhelm Weinberg William Castle
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 1. Allele frequencies will not change from generation to generation.
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 1. Allele frequencies will not change from generation to generation. 2. Genotype proportions determined by the “square law”.
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 1. Allele frequencies will not change from generation to generation. 2. Genotype proportions determined by the “square law”. • for two alleles = (p + q)2 = p2 + 2pq + q2
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 1. Allele frequencies will not change from generation to generation. 2. Genotype proportions determined by the “square law”. • for two alleles = (p + q)2 = p2 + 2pq + q2 • for three alleles (p + q + r)2 = p2 + q2 + r2 + 2pq + 2pr +2qr
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 3. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium occurs independently of allelic frequencies
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 3. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium occurs independently of allelic frequencies Allele frequencies Genotype frequencies A1 = 0.80, A2 = 0.20 A1A1 = 0.64, A1A2 = 0.32, A2A2 = 0.04
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 3. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium occurs independently of allelic frequencies Allele frequencies Genotype frequencies A1 = 0.80, A2 = 0.20 A1A1 = 0.64, A1A2 = 0.32, A2A2 = 0.04 A1 = 0.50, A2 = 0.50 A1A1 = 0.25, A1A2 = 0.50, A2A2 = 0.25
Conclusions of the Hardy-Weinberg principle 3. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium occurs independently of allelic frequencies Allele frequencies Genotype frequencies A1 = 0.80, A2 = 0.20 A1A1 = 0.64, A1A2 = 0.32, A2A2 = 0.04 A1 = 0.50, A2 = 0.50 A1A1 = 0.25, A1A2 = 0.50, A2A2 = 0.25 A1 = 0.10, A2 = 0.90 A1A1 = 0.01, A1A2 = 0.18, A2A2 = 0.81
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random… but some traits experience positive assortative mating
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random 2. Population size is infinite (i.e., no genetic drift)
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random 2. Population size is infinite (i.e., no genetic drift) 3. No migration
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random 2. Population size is infinite (i.e., no genetic drift) 3. No migration 4. No mutation
Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random 2. Population size is infinite (i.e., no genetic drift) 3. No migration 4. No mutation 5. No selection
Hardy-Weinberg principle: A null model 1. Mating is random 2. Population size is infinite (i.e., no genetic drift) 3. No migration 4. No mutation 5. No selection The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium principle thus specifies conditions under which the population will NOT evolve. In other words, H-W principle identifies the set of events that can cause evolution in real world.
Does Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ever exist in nature? Example: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Nova Scotia
Does Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ever exist in nature? Example: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Nova Scotia as a juvenile…
Does Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ever exist in nature? Example: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Nova Scotia … and as an adult
Does Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ever exist in nature? Example: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Nova Scotia • a sample of 364 fish were scored for a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)
Does Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ever exist in nature? Example: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Nova Scotia • a sample of 364 fish were scored for a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A1A1 = 109 A1A2 = 182 A2A2 = 73
Does Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ever exist in nature? Example: Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in Nova Scotia • a sample of 364 fish were scored for a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A1A1 = 109 A1A2 = 182 A2A2 = 73 Question: Is this population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?
Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium Step 1: Estimate genotype frequencies
Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium Step 1: Estimate genotype frequencies Step 2: Estimate allele frequencies
Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium Step 1: Estimate genotype frequencies Step 2: Estimate allele frequencies Step 3: Estimate expected genotype frequencies under the assumption of H-W equilibrium
Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium Step 1: Estimate genotype frequencies Step 2: Estimate allele frequencies Step 3: Estimate expected genotype frequencies under the assumption of H-W equilibrium Step 4: Compare observed and expected numbers of genotypes 2 = (Obs. – Exp.)2 Exp.
Persistent selection changes allele frequencies over generations (Obvious) Conclusion: Natural selection can cause rapid evolutionary change!
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a • let p = frequency of A allele
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a • let p = frequency of A allele • let q = frequency of a allele
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a • let p = frequency of A allele • let q = frequency of a allele • relative fitnesses are: AA Aa aa w11 w12 w22
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a • let p = frequency of A allele • let q = frequency of a allele • relative fitnesses are: AA Aa aa w11 w12 w22 • it is also possible to determine relative fitness of the A and a alleles:
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a • let p = frequency of A allele • let q = frequency of a allele • relative fitnesses are: AA Aa aa w11 w12 w22 • it is also possible to determine relative fitness of the A and a alleles: let w1 = fitness of the A allele
A simple model of directional selection • consider a single locus with two alleles A and a • let p = frequency of A allele • let q = frequency of a allele • relative fitnesses are: AA Aa aa w11 w12 w22 • it is also possible to determine relative fitnesses of the A and a alleles: let w1 = fitness of the A allele let w2 = fitness of the a allele
The fitness of the A allele = w1 = pw11 + qw12 The fitness of the a allele = w2 = qw22 + pw12
Directional selection • let p = frequency of A allele • let q = frequency of a allele • relative fitness of different genotypes are: AA Aa aa w11 w12 w22 • it is also possible to determine relative fitness of the A and a alleles: The fitness of the A allele = w1 = pw11 + qw12 The fitness of the a allele = w2 = qw22 + pw12 • Mean population fitness = w = pw1 + qw2