720 likes | 1.25k Views
Reproductive Management in Beef Cattle Estrous Synchronization and AI. Richard F. Randle, DVM, MS Beef Extension Veterinarian University of Nebraska, Lincoln. U.S. Beef Cattle Inventory 2007 Census of Agriculture. The U.S. Beef Herd. 69% of cow-calf enterprises are secondary income sources
E N D
Reproductive Management in Beef CattleEstrous Synchronization and AI Richard F. Randle, DVM, MS Beef Extension Veterinarian University of Nebraska, Lincoln
The U.S. Beef Herd • 69% of cow-calf enterprises are secondary income sources • 50% of producers report an established breeding season of specific duration • 34% of beef herds are routinely pregnancy checked • 10% of beef cattle enterprises utilize AI From NAHMS Survey, 1998
Reasons for not Using Reproductive Procedures From NAHMS Survey, 1998
Meeting the Demand? Having the correct genetics is becoming highly important to meeting industry demands Correct genetics imperative to achieving premium dollars and enhancing returns on investment
A changing market structure that recognizes and rewards quality . . . • AI allows beef producers to use high accuracy proven sires … • BW and calving ease • Weaning and yearling growth • Carcass traits • Replacement females
AI provides the opportunity to make genetic progress andadd value faster
Effective Estrus Synchronization Programs • Shorten the AI breeding season • Cows or heifers are in estrus during a predictable interval that facilitates AI • Reduce time and labor required to detect estrus • More cows and heifers becoming pregnant early during the breeding season • Result in older and heavier calves at weaning • Beneficial effects on the next breeding season • More days postpartum at the next breeding season • Replacement heifers will be older
Improvements in methods to synchronize estrus create the opportunity to significantly expand the use of AI in the U.S. cowherd...
Estrous Cycle • Length of the estrous cycle • Average 21 days (range 18 to 24 days) • Estrus (standing heat) • 12 to 18 hours (range 8 to 30 hours) • Ovulation • Approximately 30 hours after the beginning of standing heat.
LH surge onset of heat LH level Estradiol Progesterone Day of cycle 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 20/0 Follicular Luteal Follicular Luteal *Two full cycles and start of a third
LH surge onset of heat CL LH level Progesterone Day of cycle 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 20/0 *Two full cycles and start of a third Estradiol Follicular Luteal Follicular Luteal
Corpus Luteum (CL)Growth and Regression Ovulation Growth Regression Estrus Estrus 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 Day of the Estrous Cycle
Estrus Estrus 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 NO NO Prostaglandin F2 PG regresses CL YES Day of the Estrous Cycle
Follicle DevelopmentFollicular Wave Regression Dominance Growth Selection Next Recruitment Recruitment Follicle development occurs as a wave-like pattern consisting of “Recruitment”, “Selection”, “Growth”, “Dominance”, and “Regression” phases. Usually 2 to 4 follicular waves occur during the estrous cycle in cattle
Typical Pattern of Follicular Growth in Lactating Dairy Cows
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 Follicle Development During the Estrous CycleExample for 2 Follicular Waves Ovulation Ovulation Estrus Estrus Day of the Estrous Cycle Length of the estrous cycle in cattle with 2 follicular waves is typically 18 to 20 days, slightly shorter than the estrous cycle with 3 follicular waves
LH surge onset of heat LH level Progesterone Day of cycle 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 20/0 *Two full cycles and start of a third Estradiol Follicular Luteal Follicular Luteal
GnRH • Induces ovulation • Synchronizes follicular waves • Induces formation of a CL
How Does GnRH Induce Ovulation?GnRH, LH surge, and Ovulation GnRH Injection Ovulation LH Surge 2 to 4 24 to 30 0 GnRH induces LH surge within 2 to 4 hours If cattle have large, healthy follicles, ovulation will be induced approximately 24 to 30 hours after GnRH injection without estrous behavior Hours after GnRH injection
NO NO NO > 10 mm How Does GnRH Induce Ovulation?Relationship between Follicular Waves and GnRH YES YES YES GnRH injection can induce ovulation in large, healthy follicles more than 10 mm in diameter Diameter of follicles are based on the data from ultrasonographic examination GnRH injection cannot induce ovulation in smaller follicles, less than 10 mm in diameter (premature) and regressing follicles (aged and not healthy)
LH surge onset of heat LH level Progesterone Day of cycle 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 2 20/0 *Two full cycles and start of a third Estradiol Follicular Luteal Follicular Luteal
Effective Synchronization • Physiology and Biology • Synchronization of follicular waves • Induction of ovulation • Management of the CL lifespan • Initiation of estrous cyclicity
Effective Synchronization • Effective Products Available • GnRH • Cystorelin®, Factrel®, Fertagyl®, OvaCyst®, GonaBreed® • Prostaglandin • Estrumate®, In-Synch®, Lutalyse®, Prostamate® • Progestogens • MGA®, Eazi-Breed CIDR®
Resurgence in Research on Estrus Synchronization Ultimate goal is fixed-time AI with acceptable pregnancy rate!
Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Beef Reproduction Task Force http://beefrepro.unl.edu
Beef Reproduction Task Force • Review of the literature • Comparison of protocols • Beef Heifers • Heat detection protocols • Heat detection + timed AI protocols • Fixed-time AI protocols • Beef Cows • Heat detection protocols • Heat detection + timed AI protocols • Fixed-time AI protocols
Synchronization and Natural Service Use a protocol that uses heat detection Use smaller breeding pastures or lots to reduce travel Use young mature bulls that are active known breeders Make sure pecking order is established Use bull to female ratio of 1:15 to 1:25
Synchronization and Natural Service Bulls in PG 1 Shot- PG 0 5 45 Natural Service Treatment day Larson DM, Musgrave JA, Funston RN, University of Nebraska
Plan the work. Work the plan! Expectations for synchronization protocol. Is the herd suited for synchronization protocol? Labor needs . Number of time through the chute. Synchronization costs. Handling facility capabilities. Impact on calving distribution. Record system.
Synchronization Expectations • Survey of recent results from today’s mainstay protocols • 10 trials with 2,970 females from 34 different experimental groups • Average Synch preg. rate = 50.5% (8 to 66%) • 26% of groups > 60% synch preg. rate • 50% of groups 40% to 60% synch preg.rate • 24% of groups < 40% synch preg. rate
Synchronization Expectations Don’t expect great miracles. Do expect variation. • Survey of recent results from today’s mainstay protocols • 10 trials with 2,970 females from 34 different experimental groups • Average Synch preg. rate = 50.5% (8 to 66%) • 26% of groups > 60% synch preg. rate • 50% of groups 40% to 60% synch preg.rate • 24% of groups < 40% synch preg. rate
Conception Rate Formula (Cow fertility) X (Heat detection) X (Semen fertility) X (AI technique) Fail at any one of these and kiss success goodbye!!
Standing Estrus Perry, GA: South Dakota State University
Estrous Detection • Detection aides • Kmars • Chinball markers • Gomer bulls • Tail chalk • HeatWatch
Synchronization is an Investment • Labor • Facilities • Management • Dollars • In round numbers • Budgeted costs for synch programs can range from $20 to $40 per synchronized female
Is the Herd a Good Candidate? • Fertility rate • Calving distribution • Cow age • Body condition • Calving success • Replacement management
Replacement Management Age Target Weight Reproductive tract scores Breed 20 days prior to cows
Cow AgeHeifers take 20 days longer to cycle… Johnson and Stevenson, KSU
Body Condition Score CS = 4 CS = 6 Daryl Strohbehn, Iowa Beef Center
Body Condition Score A Barometer of the Nutrition Program CS = 4 CS = 6 Major Influence on Start of Cyclicity Daryl Strohbehn, Iowa Beef Center
Effect of BCS at Breeding on % Cycling CS <3.5 25% CS 4-4.5 40-48% CS 5-5.5 58-72% CS 6 80% or more Daryl Strohbehn, Iowa Beef Center