1 / 12

Project Endeavor

Project Endeavor. Outreach Strategies The Good, The Bad and The What Really Works. June 27, 2011. Communication Service for the Deaf 102 North Krohn Place • Sioux Falls, SD 57103. The Digital Divide.

jabari
Download Presentation

Project Endeavor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Project Endeavor Outreach Strategies The Good, The Bad and The What Really Works June 27, 2011 Communication Service for the Deaf 102 North Krohn Place • Sioux Falls, SD 57103

  2. The Digital Divide ”Americans with disabilities are less than half as likely as their non-disabled counterparts to own a computer, and they are about one-quarter as likely to use the Internet.” Stephen Kaye, PhD. Disabilities Statistics Center

  3. Focus on deaf and hard of hearing individuals • To provide subsidized broadband to introduce people to the Internet • Provide equipment at reduced or no cost to eligible consumer • Partner with existing community organizations serving the deaf to reach out to hard to serve individuals • Demonstrate how to make web based services accessible to deaf and hard of hearing individuals • Find or develop tutorials on web access that were understandable for deaf consumers Project Goals

  4. Best Practices • Unique Contact Center • TTY, voice, videophone, email, IM, web chat, IP relay • Public Access Videophones (PAVs) • Distribute to various public locations • Provides direct access to internet and video communications

  5. The Good • National large network of organizations and clubs serving deaf and hard of hearing (We knew where we could find them) • Project Endeavor staff are knowledgeable concerning hearing loss & technology (We knew their needs) • Commitment to 100% accessible communication (We spoke their language)

  6. The Bad • Slick web based and social marketing campaigns don’t touch individuals with zero Internet • Our population had a much higher adoption rate than the overall disability community • For the truly needy the price point is zero

  7. The Bad Cont’d • With disability access equipment there is no one size fits all • Seniors • Hard of hearing/non-signing • “Younger plugged in” population • Unanticipated Characteristics • Many currently subscribing to Internet, but only for video calls • Need in person handholding to take the dive

  8. And The Bad Cont’d • Equipment is sexy, broadband is boring • The solutions that were current when we wrote the grant are becoming old solutions • The private sector has a difficulty seeing many of our consumers as a viable market

  9. What Really Works • In person, high touch support • Multiple solutions but you have to keep it simple • Catch their attention with a piece of equipment then discuss Internet options • Even with a two year project think first wave and second wave solutions

  10. And Continues to Work • There is little ROI in generic outreach • Outreach must address unique functional needs • Present “your” consumers as a market share that someone is going to get

  11. Discussion • Share your experiences! • Challenges • Best practices • Outreach strategies pinpointing specific or unique populations

  12. Thank you!! Dave Miller dmiller@c-s-d.org Kim Barron kbarron@c-s-d.org WWW.PROJECTENDEAVOR.COM

More Related