1 / 27

MICE Project Status

MICE Project Status. Funding Agency Committee 19 th September 2005. MICE project: Build MICE Install MICE Operate MICE PM=Coordinating: design activities interfaces construction safety resources schedule risks. MICE Project Structures.

jackson-lambert
Download Presentation

MICE Project Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MICE Project Status Funding Agency Committee 19th September 2005

  2. MICE project: Build MICE Install MICE Operate MICE PM=Coordinating: design activities interfaces construction safety resources schedule risks

  3. MICE Project Structures • MICE Collaboration Board – collaboration chair • MICE Executive Board – spokesman • MICE Technical Board – project manager • Tech Spec & Change Control • Technical Coordination • WBS/OBS • Task Managers • Engineering integration & monitoring • Engineering installation • Safety • MICE Schedule • MICE Risk Management • MICE(UK) fund & schedule management

  4. MICE Project Tasks • WBS + visualisation as a set of Gantt charts • Expresses task break down & interrelationships • Critical Path • Milestone definitions • Resource (People Cash) allocation & responsibilities • Schedule • Responsive – change controlled • Proposed by TB • Agreed at EB

  5. WBS • 1 MICE • 1.1 MICE Integration (Drumm/RAL) 1.1.1 Mice Experiment (Drumm+TechBoard) 1.1.2 Mice Into Experimental Hall (RAL/UK) 1.1.3 Experimental Integration Overview (Oxford/UK) • 1.2 Muon Beam Line and Infrastructure (Drumm/RAL) 1.2.1 Muon Beam Line (RAL) 1.2.2 Cryogenic Infrastructure (RAL) 1.2.3 Hydrogen System Infrastructure (RAL) 1.2.4 Civil Engineering (RAL) 1.2.5 Plant and Services (RAL) 1.2.6 Interlocks and Safety (RAL) 1.2.7 MICE Support Infrastructure (RAL) 1.2.8 ISIS-MICE Controls Interface (RAL) 1.2.9 Vacuum Systems (RAL) • 1.3 MICE Cooling Modules (Zisman/LBNL) 1.3.1 Absorber and Focus Coil Module (Oxford/UK) 1.3.2 Cavity and Coupling Coil Module (LBNL/US) 1.3.3 RF Power Systems (DL/UK) 1.3.4 Magnet Power Supplies (LBNL/US) 1.3.5 Installation and Integration (LBNL/US) • 1.4 Detectors, Tracker Solenoid and Measurement (Bross/FNAL) 1.4.1 ToF (EU) 1.4.2 Up Stream Cherenkov (UMO/US) 1.4.3 Down Stream Cherenkov (EU) 1.4.4 Tracker Module (IC/UK) 1.4.5 µCAL(EU) 1.4.6 Data Acquisition (Vacant) 1.4.7 Analysis and Simulation Software (Torun) • 1.5 Slow Controls - Instrumentation & Monitoring (Blondel) 1.5.X Physics List (MAC) 1.5.Y Controls Coordination (DL/UK) • 1.6 Management (Drumm/RAL) wrong

  6. cEu UK US Jp activity absorber cavity task instrumentation vacuum integration resource

  7. Review roadmap Monitoring Create Working group Control Video conferences Collaboration meetings Technical Board Develop Design Concept Review TB Video conferences Collaboration meetings Technical Board Engineer TB Audit RAL Review RAL Operate

  8. Schedule Overview Needs correction Funding Limited

  9. Integration • Ties together • Resources • Design Activities • Oversight

  10. Beam Line • Beam Line • Target on the ISIS synchrotron • Optics: capture; decay; matched beam into the MICE channel • Beam elements from ISIS • New power supplies • Decay solenoid from PSI • cryogenic system expensive

  11. Location ISIS: 50 Hz 800 MeV 300 µA MICE: 1 Hz 800 MeV ~0.1 µA

  12. MICE Hall

  13. Infrastructure • Shielding • Electricity • Water • Alignment • RF Power Systems* • Reuse of equipment (ex LBNL ex CERN) • Hydrogen delivery system* • Critical safety issue * Funded for prototyping to reduce downstream schedule risks

  14. Cooling Channel:AFC • SC Coils surrounding liquid hydrogen cell • Complex engineering task • Critical safety issue • 20 l each absorber • Explosive : 17% - 56% • Flammable : 4% - 75% • Ignition: 20mJ in air • Gas. Density: 6% of air • Liq. Density: 7% of water • Expansion ratio 800:1 • Particular problem of pumping • Oxygen plates out on cold surfaces & cannot be detected LH2 Vac-I O2 Un-detectable warm cold Vac-II O2 detectable

  15. Absorber System

  16. Cooling Channel:RF-CC MUCOOL R&D Curved Be windows R&D Issue: High MV/m in a strong Bfield 0.38 mm thick, 420 mm dia. 201 MHz

  17. Cooling Channel: RF-Power 4 MW Power systems Two high power amplifiers and drivers ex LBNL Two high power amplifiers ex CERN drivers ex CERN/LBNL New LLRF system Deliver 8MW into 8 cavities or Deliver 2MW into 4 cavities

  18. Cooling Channel:I&I Interfaces & Integration Module Integration: Module-to-module MICE to floor MICE to services Abstract: Forces Engineering Standards QA/QC

  19. Instrumentation: Particle Identification • Conventional particle detection applied to accelerator diagnostics • Particle identification • Impure beam – protons, p, m, e • Time-of-flight • Cherenkov • Calorimeter • Momentum & emittance measurement • Spectrometer: Tracking in a magnetic field

  20. Instrumentation: Spectrometer Solenoid • Critical path item • US responsibility • Cash flow limitedconstruction Gantt Baseline: End ’07 End ’08 Resource limited

  21. Instrumentation:Spectrometer Tracker Scintillating fibre tracking detector pattern recognition – systematic errors evaluated with cosmic rays – stringent tests in B field planned MICE tracker Spectrometer

  22. Instrumentation: I&I Interfaces & Integration

  23. Safety Issues • General engineering issues • Working at height • Heavy objects • Confined spaces • More specific risks • Cryogenic fluids • High Voltage • Magnetic fields • RF fields & Xrays • Ionising & non-ionising radiation • Liquid hydrogen • Uniform approach  safety first • Processes & tools in place • RAL Confidence in MICE is important for success

  24. Critical Path - Significant Milestones • Delivery of Decay Solenoid Cryogenics • ISIS Shutdown 2006/7 • Completion of beam line • Delivery of completed tracker detector • Delivery of PID instrumentation • Delivery of 1st spectrometer solenoid

  25. Risk • Delivery of items in phase 1 • Cost overrun (always a risk) • Schedule slippage (¨) • Still dependent on successful funding bids • INFN particularly • Be, Nl, CH • Contingency plan: • Re-evaluate minimum needs to characterise the beam • Re-alignment of activities to meet these needs

  26. Risk • Delivery of items in phase 2 • Contingent on successful delivery of phase 1 • Same cost & schedule risks • US delivery cash limited • Cavities, coupling coils • Again dependent on as yet unfunded bids (e.g.) • UK: absorbers, cavity • CH: coupling coil

  27. Summary

More Related