180 likes | 191 Views
This analysis by Sen. Will Brownsberger highlights the continued unfairness in FY13 education aid distribution due to a glitch in the implementation of the 2006 reforms. It includes examples from other districts, such as Belmont vs. Watertown, and proposes options to address the funding gap. The fairest solution would be to establish a minimum aid floor based on the gap between target contribution and required local contribution.
E N D
Fixing a Local Aid Glitch Discretionary Decisions in the Implementation of 2006 Education Aid Reforms
Results still unfair in FY13 Note, other similar examples can be found – e.g., Belmont vs. Watertown. Sen. Will Brownsberger
The Transition Gap Sen. Will Brownsberger
Dropping Down Payment Aid in the Financial Crunch Sen. Will Brownsberger
Waltham has faired poorly because (a) it was among the most misportrayed under the old formula and (b) we chose Effort Reduction over Down Payment. Sen. Will Brownsberger
Options to get Waltham to 13.25% of FB (13.25% gets Waltham $203,549 increase or 2.9% on $7,068,165 FY12 Aid.) Sen. Will Brownsberger
Options to Offset $10.8m in Cost Sen. Will Brownsberger
Summary of Analysis • Elimination of Down Payment Aid while continuing effort reduction disproportionately disadvantaged communities that (a) have above-target RLC (b) have targets near 82.5% and (c) are most misportrayed by pre-reform aid model (Waltham, others). • Fairest solution is to place a floor on the gap between target contribution and required local contribution, so increasing aid for those furthest below target aid level at all wealth levels. Sen. Will Brownsberger
Funding Options Summary Note: All options provide standard grandfathering of FY12 aid. Sen. Will Brownsberger