E N D
1. Societal Aspects of Nuclear Technology Kathryn Higley
Dept. Of Nuclear Engineering
higley@ne.orst.edu
3. Syllabus – Class Format Multiple lecturer format
Weekly class structure
Technical background presented on weekly topic
Relevant issue (or issues) will be identified
Discussion, debate, and /or role-playing will occur.
Class will analyze pro and con sides of issue
Class will reconvene and actively discuss/debate the issue.
A brief quiz given at end of class.
4. Syllabus – Course Objective Provide an introduction and understanding of nuclear issues frequently encountered in our daily lives
Assumes no particular background in science or in nuclear topics
Not intended to be either pro- or anti-nuclear
Provide students with understanding of selected nuclear technologies and controversies surrounding them
5. Syllabus – Course Objective Primary Textbooks:
"Nuclear Choices" by Richard Wolfson
“America the Powerless” by Alan Walters
Additional supplementary material, as required, will be provided
Grading:
Quizzes: 40%,
Paper: 30%,
Final exam: 30%.
6. Lecture Schedule
7. Lecture Schedule
8. Nuclear News Nuclear Choices
9. Nuclear Technology – What Is It? Images of our world
Weapons
Reactors
Nuclear waste
Hiroshima
Anti Nuclear Protests
Media bring nuclear technology to our attention
How to sort out the issues from the noise?
10. Nuclear Weapons
11. Common Perceptions of Nuclear Technology Understand our own biases
12. Nuclear Power
16. Nuclear Weapons Can any sane person make a case for their continued existence?
17. Nuclear Stuff in the Movies
20. Other Radiation Tidbits - As Seen in the Media
23. Media Stories Do I have to worry about radiation on airplanes?
Is flying like working in a nuclear power plant?
Does that mean nuclear plants are safe or flying is hazardous?
24. Other Nuclear News
27. Radon
30. Radon What is it
Should I get my house tested?
Is it related to nuclear power?
Why didn’t someone tell me about it earlier?
31. Print Media
32. Nuclear Topics What to think
33. Objective of Class Recognize that preconceived notions can hinder clear thinking and fruitful discussions
Understand the basis of the technology
Then decide
34. Radiation Fictions Fear:
“It’s gonna blow!!!”
Controversy:
“We’re all gonna die!”
Misunderstanding:
“It’s not natural!”
Mistrust
“They’re all liars. We know mutant bugs will take over the earth and enslave us.”
35. Radiation Facts It’s been around forever
We first noticed it ~ 1895
A lot was learned since then:
doctors & radiation could cure cancer
quacks & radiation could kill people
the Military & radiation could kill a LOT of people
Basic limits set in the 1950s still hold
36. Sources of Environmental Radiation Radiation & radionuclides older than the Earth
Natural part of our environment
Radiation field varies by geology, elevation, season, living conditions
37. Sources of “Artificial” Radiation Medical
Occupational
Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Fallout
Petroleum Industries
Power generation
Other
38. Quanties & Units Amount (activity):
Becquerel (Bq) dis/s
Curie (Ci) 3.7 x 1010 dis/s
Dose:
gray (Gy) 1 J/kg
rad, 0.01 Gy
Dose equivalent
sievert (Sv)
rem, 0.01 Sv
Exposure (roentgen, R)
39. Range of Doses General public - 360 mrem/y natural
Radon: 200 mrem
Other natural: 97 mrem
Remainder ~ 15 % medical, 3% products, 1% other
Medical procedures (per procedure)
CT head and body: 110 mrem
Chest X-ray: 8 mrem
Abdominal X-ray: 56 mrem
40. Percentage Contribution to Dose Contribution of various radiation sources to total average dose equivalent to persons in the United States (NCRP, 1987).
41. Basic Facts Two main types:
electromagnetic (X-rays and gamma rays)
particulate (electrons, protons, alpha particles..)
Produced in the nucleus or through atomic orbital transitions
Capable of ionizing (removing electrons) from atoms
42. Electromagnetic Radiation
43. Radiation Particles - ? ?
44. Types and properties of ionizing radiation
45. Radiation Effects in Living Tissues
46. Routes of Radiation Exposure
47. Range of Radiation Effects Hormesis (a little is good for you)
Nothing
Impaired organ function
Cancer
Genetic (mutation in offspring)
Teratogen (impairment in offspring)
Death
48. Factors Determining Impact Radiation type ( ?, ?, ?, n )
Duration of delivery (s ? y)
Location (external or internal)
Distribution in / around body
Magnitude of dose
Sensitive individual
49. Predicting Radiation Effects Why the “uncertainty”?
Not all effects are apparent
Knowledge limitations (likely impact)
Natural variations (radiation field changes)
Measurement ability (you can only go so low)
Dose is predicted
Risk (death, cancer) projected
Where do we get “risk” numbers?
50. Radiation Effects Model
51. Radiation Effects Data Base Mainly for people or lab rats
Good data in high dose/high dose-rate region
Limited/contradictory data in low dose/low-dose rate region
Some data suggest threshold (~10 rem)
52. What about other biota? Insects are tough to kill
Big trees are as sensitive as we are
So are most mammals
Fish and plants are about 10x more resistant
But…..
radionuclides are “more concentrated” lower in food chain
lower form biota “naturally” get higher dose
53. Radiosensitivity of Species
54. So Radiation in high doses can kill you
Radiation in moderate doses increases your cancer risk
Radiation at doses near or below background may (pick one):
do nothing
help you
hinder you
55. If you want more information: Kathryn Higley
Department of Nuclear Engineering
7-0675
higley@ne.orst.edu
56. Topic For Discussion How clean is clean enough?
Or,
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing
59. Hanford Cleanup See handout for additional information
Answer this question:
How clean should we make Hanford?
Pristine
Localized hot spots
Leave it alone
From whose perspective should we argue?