170 likes | 185 Views
This paper explores the importance of ownership structures in achieving effective corporate governance in Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). It discusses the historical background of DFIs, governance problems in national DFIs, and actions to improve corporate governance. The paper also highlights the role of the SADC Development Finance Resource Centre (DFRC) and the mandate of DFRC in respect of DFIs.
E N D
Effective Corporate Governance through Ownership: the case of DFIs in SADC Dr. Ros Thomas (CEO) The Third Pan-African Consultative Forum on Corporate Governance WABA Dakar 8-10 November 2005
Topics to be covered: • Introduction: Focus of Paper • Historical Background (failure of development finance to yield results) • The emergence of tiered DFIs • Governance Problems in national DFIs • DFIs continue to be critical actors in SADC • The DFRC’s mandate • Ownership structures of Network DFIs • Actions to improve Corporate Governance • TIB & DBZ • Concluding remarks
Introduction: Focus of Paper • Discusses nature & import of Corp. Gov. & role that ownership & ownership structures play in respect of acceptable standards of control -- with focus on DFIs in SADC • Flawed history of public ownership & need to achieve industry best practice • Shows that ownership structure is vital for appropriate governance
History: The Failure of development finance • Emergence of a tiered grouping of DFIs • World Bank/IFC (1945/+1955) • National DFIs (first 1949 – Netherlands & Finland) • “development finance” – long-term (forex loans) for productive assets in industrial and infrastructure sectors • Other sectors – agriculture/rural credits; SME finance; housing (domestic resources) • 5 Regional DBs (1955-1990)
The various tiers of DFIs - Global to National Global: The World Bank Group (WB) Regional: IADB, AfDB, AsDB, IsDB, EBRD Sub-Regional: CDB, AnDF, CABEI, EADB, WADB, MIB, SPDB, BADEA, PTAB National: DFIs for Industry & Infrastructure, Agriculture & Rural Credit, Small & Medium Enterprise, Micro-enterprise, Housing Finance, & Gender Credit (Source: DFS 98)
History: The Failure of development finance • Governance Problems in African DFIs • 1990s - development finance & role of DFIs underwent fundamental re-examination • Theory: perceived need for development finance sign of temporary imperfections in market – did not suggest need for DFI • Private finance reluctant to bear risk of difficult country environments • General picture for African DFIs reflected issues relating to governance
Failure of development finance… • Governance Problems in African DFIs? • Political influence resulting in credit diversion • Subsidies on cost of funds on-lent & non-performing assets • DFIs operations aggravated weakness of local banking & financial systems • DFI lending considered to have led to negative growth & income distribution in Africa - crowding out activities (lending to parastatals & TNC subsidiaries) • Resource allocation on basis of fiat rather than market signals – failed to allocate credit productively (scarce forex lent to SOEs with poor operational and financial performance – contaminated portfolios • Erosion of financial discipline & resource misallocation through politically directed credit, poor selection (?appraisal skills?), inadequate sectoral diversification & risk concentration – most DFIs insolvent • Over-exposure to cyclical & default risk because of excessive exposure to large enterprises/ projects financed
But DFIs still critical actors in SADC… • Despite problems (DFS 98): - • DFIs & development finance will remain part of financial landscape because: • Financial systems remain underdeveloped • DFIs offer a range of financial & other services for industry • They are important in sectors like agriculture; housing and SMEs • In absence of capital markets, liberalization programs failed to emphasize continued importance of DFIs • They can be revamped/ adjusted to meet challenges
But DFIs still critical actors in SADC… • However - • DFIs still dealing with some adverse macroeconomic conditions: • Have not quickly corrected inadequate structures • Remain too dependent on financing from MDBs/RDBs • Lack insufficient institutional capacity & shortage of appropriate Human Resources • Still bound to politically mandated functions that do not respect commercial and financial viability
DFRC’s Mandate in respect of DFIs • DFS 1998 – Member States agreed on need for DFRC – established to serve all DFIs • Tasked to facilitate the following: • Dealing with non-performing assets; • Increase financial autonomy & independence; • Encourage cross-border strategic alliances & operational partnerships for the efficient & optimal use of development finance; • Help corporatize and privatize financially sound DFIs; & • Encourage cross-shareholdings in each other.
Ownership structure of DFIs in SADC… • Either wholly/ majority state owned • Countries with low credit rating & severe fiscal constraints, public ownership hampers financing of institutions • Access to lines of credit restricted • Cannot rely on fiscal transfers for re-capitalization or loan funding • Ownership in some being broadened through privatization • Do not fall within purview of Banking Act • Do not specify prudential requirements • E.g. % of risk weighted assets • Often no capital adequacy, non-accrual, provisioning & statutory reserves policies • Board of Directors reflects significant influence of Public Owner – susceptible to Govt. interference
Action to Improve Corporate Governance? (TIB/DBZ) • In light of failures alluded to… • SADC Govts changing ownership structures & strengthening laws & regulations • Changing Board representation (incl. Pvt. Sect) to capture variety of skills & experiences • Inviting equity participation from private sector to dilute Govt influence • DFRC mandated to support this process • FIRST (2003) – Needs Analysis and Skills Audit
Action to Improve Corporate Governance? (TIB/DBZ) • Critical institutional weaknesses highlighted… • Corporate Governance (10 out of 18 DFIs audited) • Risk Management as an essential ingredient of Corp Governance identified • Capacity Building Workshops/ Seminars - • Chairpersons of Boards – May 2005 • Other Directors (Audit/ Asset-Liability/ Credit) at country level December 05 and early 2006 • Risk Management training – November 2004 & early 2006
Improving Corporate Governance… • Institutional Strengthening ? (TIB/DBZ) • Support for reform initiatives • Two different strategies on ownership being tried • TIB – shift from merchant-type bank to DB • DBZ – shift from DB to private company • Framework for involvement • Reforming Countries • Round Table discussion – with major stakeholders to: • formulate strategy • address shareholding; mandate (target sectors) • organizational structures (separate out shareholder, board & management responsibilities to ensure independence) • Technical Assistance for institution through DFRC once strategic plan in place and being implemented
Concluding Remarks… • Corp. Gov. critical for DFIs – to ensure market confidence • Allows - lines of credit by MDBs/RDBs/ stronger NDBs • As Govt shareholding recedes - accountability/ openness in business dealings and attracting private sector involvement more important • Must ensure strong corp. gov. in their borrowers • To manage portfolio properly and risks arising • DFRC’s efforts with DFIs will continue to focus on raising corp. gov. to industry best practice.
THANK YOU! Dr. Ros Thomas (CEO) SADC-DFRC P. Bag 0034 Gaborone Rthomas@sadc-dfrc.org www.sadc-dfrc.org (under construction)