1 / 22

Working together across disciplines

Working together across disciplines. Challenges for the natural and social sciences. RELU project team at Warwick University. Dept of Politics & International Studies. Wyn Grant , Justin Greaves. Warwick HRI. Dave Chandler , Gill Prince. Dept of Biological Sciences. Mark Tatchell.

jacquesv
Download Presentation

Working together across disciplines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Working together across disciplines Challenges for the natural and social sciences

  2. RELU project team at Warwick University • Dept of Politics & International Studies. Wyn Grant, Justin Greaves. • Warwick HRI. Dave Chandler, Gill Prince. • Dept of Biological Sciences. Mark Tatchell.

  3. contents • Why work together? • The research process & methodological considerations. • Practical issues for effective collaboration. • Conclusions. Is multi-disciplinary collaboration sufficient or should we aim higher?

  4. Why work together? Fundamental research • Some areas have a natural overlap: • Development of theory. • Behavioural research in economics & biology: • ‘1st wave’: evolutionary game theory. • ‘2nd wave’ : unified theories of behaviour.

  5. Fundamental research • Borrowing of ideas, or genuine collaboration. • Work on a common problem, need a common language (e.g. mathematics). • Complementary methodologies → unified theory & methodology. • Kudos in academic community.

  6. Strategic & applied research • Human activity causes global problems. • Social and natural sciences needed for effective solutions. • Project teams often multidisciplinary: can they influence each other?

  7. Strategic & applied research • Teams form for specific project. Issues of buy-in? • Methodologies often kept separate. • Different languages. • Hard for partners to influence each other? • Danger of unequal relationships. • Lower value in academic community, but very important in wider world.

  8. Science & society • Natural scientists must become better communicators. • Public understanding of scientific process (Hails & Dale, 2005). • Social scientists need to understand natural science. • Public value of science (Wilsdon et al., 2005)

  9. Science & society • Enhanced confidence in public & stakeholders. • Develop language for effective communication : • social & natural scientists & public. • Public engagement not highly valued in academic circles (‘media dons’).

  10. Warwick RELU research:A practical example Environmental & regulatory sustainability of biopesticides.

  11. Pesticides have many benefits, but … • Resistance, new chemistry expensive. • Integrated Pest Management. • Microbial control agents: • Desirable characteristics. • Poor uptake in UK & EU.

  12. Biopesticides: regulatory innovation using political & natural science? • Strengths & weaknesses of regulation. • Research on ecology of microbial agents. • Evaluate costs & benefits in a holistic way. • Biological data requirements. • Regulatory innovation.

  13. Politics Stakeholders Evaluation of costs & benefits Biology of Production Systems Regulation Impact on biological data requirements

  14. Research processes & methodologies • Analysis of the research process in social & natural science: • Challenge preconceptions. • Help overcome constraints to collaboration. • Can the same approaches be used to study the natural & social worlds?

  15. Theory Problem specification / Conceptual framework Conclusions & inference Hypotheses Empirical research The research wheel in social & natural sciences deductive inductive Dominant models : neo-positivism & critical realism

  16. Methodological issues (1): experiments • Ability to do replicated experiments differs between social & natural science. • Use of comparison : circumvents problems of not being able to do an experiment. • Need to develop best methodologies available for natural & social science.

  17. Methodological issues (2): Issues of scale & inference • Ecological & individualistic fallacies: • Ecological: identify relationships at aggregate level that do not reflect the corresponding relationship at individual level. • Individual: draw conclusions from groups based on data gathered with the individual.

  18. Methodological issues (3): Issues of scale & inference • Specific, micro level studies can proliferate at the expense of broad questions. • Bottom up approaches often use simplified systems for study: danger of individualistic fallacy. • In biology, a new field of studying complex systems is emerging. • Use of model organisms/ systems in biology.

  19. The challenge of interdisciplinary research • How can social & natural science components influence each other in a project? • Social science more flexible: can respond quickly to input from natural scientists. • Protocols followed in natural science can make research less flexible. • Need for upstream influence. Avoid having ‘pet’ social scientists.

  20. Day to day issues • Need to understand the other discipline. • Appreciate that different schools exist within each discipline. • Problems of technical language : plain speaking required! • Social science writing is more discursive.

  21. Working together has positive outcomes • Better social & natural science. • Better analytical tools for social science. • Natural scientists’ knowledge on social issues placed in a systematic framework. • Joint outcomes. • Fundamental research: development of theory. • Applied / strategic: sustainable solutions for complex problems. • Science & society: better communication & upstream thinking. • New opportunities. • Access to new sources of money for new kinds of research. • Non threatening collaborations.

  22. Thanks for your attention www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/biopesticides/

More Related