290 likes | 1.62k Views
Bangladesh Grameen Bank (BGB) Model. 5 members groups, they must be neighbors but not relatives Joint Liability Groups (JLG) or Solidarity Groups (SG) Individual lending within JLG model 7 groups constitute a centre at the village level
E N D
Bangladesh Grameen Bank (BGB) Model • 5 members groups, they must be neighbors but not relatives • Joint Liability Groups (JLG) or Solidarity Groups (SG) • Individual lending within JLG model • 7 groups constitute a centre at the village level • All loans must be approved by other group members as well as all other centre members • Lending is in the order of 2:2:1 (leader being the last) • Every member must contribute Rs. 5/week • Inability of a client to pay savings results in the concerned group or centre paying up for that client
Bangladesh Grameen Bank (BGB) Model • 5 % of all productive loans disbursed to a group is collected as tax and deposited in the group fund • From this group fund, member can access loans for consumption purposes (maximum 75% of group fund), no interest charge • There is also an emergency fund (optional) where each member contribute Rs. 1/week. • Loan disbursement is done at the centre level. • Weekly repayment schedule (maximum 52 weeks) • Interest rate varies between 15-24 % p.a. on flat basis and on a weekly basis.
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective • Strength for SHG Model - Flexible internal operations - can select cheaper supplier of funds - can evolve from existing groups - can evolve into Federations - very empowering - a major part of the interest is retained within the group fund
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective • Weaknesses of SHG model - Need management skills - can be hijacked internally or externally - cash may not be secure, if savings are held within the group
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective • Strengths of BGB model - No need for literacy - Protected from internal exploiters - Poorer are included - Bank/MFI can offer tailor-made services - savings are safe - members are forced to accumulate reserves, which can be used in emergencies
SHG V/s BGB Model – Client Perspective • Weaknesses of BGB model - inflexible internal operations, very rigid - group composition not in members’ control - must meet frequently (weekly), more time consuming
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective • Strength of SHG model - lower costs, (one account for whole group) and (appraisal, recovery done by members) - groups can fit to any branch - No social intermediation cost as groups are promoted by SHPI - large access to clients
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective • Weaknesses of SHG model - Need SHPI to promote the groups - Groups may move to other bank - more risks as hard to monitor the groups - slow process to increase the scale of business - may be forced to link the groups under some “schemes”
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective • Strengths of BGB model - Tight control over the groups, so less risk - standardized procedures - members have the feelings of ‘belonging’ to bank/MFI
SHG V/s BGB Model – Bank/MFI Perspective • Weaknesses of BGB model - Higher transaction costs - members need continuous guidance and presence - needs dedicated system
SHG Model – Suitable Conditions • Existing bank network in rural areas • Communities are fragmented, with various different groups based on caste, or wealth level • There are credible NGOs or other community development institutions to promote the groups • Peoples’ opportunities and financial service needs are diverse
BGB Model – Suitable Conditions • The prospective clients are very poor and marginalized, and are vulnerable to exploitation unless they are protected by a rigid structure • Clients are illiterate • The area is densely populated, so that it is practical for MFI staff to visit the groups every week • The population is fairly homogenous
Federated SHG Model • Federation is apex institution of all SHGs in an area (1000-3000 members) • SHG------Cluster------------Federation • Federation can be registered under Society registration Act. • Helps in promotion of new SHG and strengthening of existing SHGs • Facilitate inter-group exchange (financial and non-financial) • Access of outside funds to member SHGs
Federated SHG Model • As the number of groups increases, it becomes difficult for SHPI to interact directly with each group • SHPI can start withdrawing and can concentrate on other area • External funds for on-lending are routed through federation • Federation can help SHGs in loan recovery
NBFC Model • Profit maximization through financial services to rural/poor clients • Registered as profit making NBFC under the Companies Act 1956 • Diverse client group • Multiple channels • Sound financial intermediation, no social intermediation • Diversified products for different clients