1 / 17

Integrated Risk Management

Integrated Risk Management. Christian DeVoll, Risk Management Specialist March 24, 2011. Overview. 110 specific IRM site visits to date 57 Serious losses studied Description of recommended corrective actions Reoccurring areas of exposure/vulnerability Follow-up Risk Management .

jag
Download Presentation

Integrated Risk Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Integrated Risk Management Christian DeVoll, Risk Management Specialist March 24, 2011

  2. Overview • 110 specific IRM site visits to date • 57 Serious losses studied • Description of recommended corrective actions • Reoccurring areas of exposure/vulnerability • Follow-up Risk Management

  3. Description of Recommended Corrective Actions • Take advantage of Training Coalition Classes (17) • Safety Inspections or Safety Committee Meetings (16) • System Safety or Action Prevention Plan/Safety and Security Implementation (11) • Public Safety Watch Program (11)

  4. Description of RCA’s Cont. • Complete Revisions to Employee Handbook/Ops Manual (9) • Implement a Safety Rewards Program (6) • Para-transit-type Training (4) • Install/Update vehicle camera systems (4) • Update Emergency Notification List to include WSTIP (3)

  5. High Exposure Recommended Corrective Actions • Bus zone and/or Route Monitoring/Development (21) • Remedial Training (18) • Refresher Training (14) • Document Accident Preventability Guidelines (10) • Supervisor Training (8) • Implement internal serious loss review process (7)

  6. Reoccurring Areas of Safety Exposure/Vulnerability • Policy enforcement/accountability issues • Inconsistent enforcement of accident preventability policy/guidelines • CBA integration with safety performance • Inconsistent safety performance standards

  7. Reoccurring Areas of Safety Exposure/Vulnerability (cont) • 62% of operators had 1 or more preventable collisions in the previous 3 year period • 27 out of 42 operators were considered veteran operators (4 or more years with the organization) • 10 operators were terminated • 8 received some sort of remedial training • 14 received no remedial training • 10 cases no information for preventability or remediation was provided • 5 of the 42 accidents were determined non-preventable by the member

  8. Reoccurring Areas of Safety Exposure/Vulnerability (Cont) • Supervisor training • Interviewing and Report writing • Organizational communication • Breaking down silos • Information exchange process • Scheduling meetings

  9. IRM Priorities • Some members received more or less attention due to: • Experience rating adjustments • Extra assessment on the assessment for adverse loss experience … those that received extra assessment were given more attention / those with large credits were given less • Fixed route cases meeting certain criteria (pedestrian losses) • Goal of at least one loss review for every member

  10. Three Year Positive Experience Rating • Clallam Transit • Community Transit • Grant Transit • Grays Harbor Transit • Island Transit • Jefferson Transit • Pacific Transit • Skagit Transit • Whatcom Transit • Yakima Transit

  11. Experience Rating Adjustments • 2009 Experience Rating Adjustments • Columbia County ($677) • Everett Transit ($29,770) • Kitsap Transit ($32,985) • Mason Transit (4,587) • Pullman Transit ($49) • Twin Transit ($401) • Valley Transit ($4,117) • Spokane Transit ($91,195)

  12. Experience Rating Adjustments • 2010 • Ben Franklin Transit ($712) • Columbia County ($896) • CUBS ($71) • Everett Transit ($18,316) • Intercity Transit ($15,157) • Kitsap Transit ($38,530) • Link Transit ($6,621) • Mason Transit ($3,959) • Pullman Transit ($492) • Spokane Transit ($60,805) • Twin Transit ($1) • Valley Transit ($389)

  13. Experience Rating Adjustments • 2011 • Ben Franklin Transit ($26,671) • Columbia ($339) • Everett Transit ($9,298) • Intercity Transit ($39,166) • Mason Transit ($1,505) • Pierce Transit ($75,053) • Spokane Transit ($12,469)

  14. Experience Rating Adjustments • Everett Transit • 2009 $29,770 • 2010 $18,316 • 2011 $9,298 • Mason Transit • 2009 $4,587 • 2010 $3,959 • 2011 $1,505 • Spokane Transit • 2009 $91,195 • 2010 $60,805 • 2011 $12,469

  15. Next Steps • Follow-up with members on IRM Work Plans • Develop Best Practice in Operator Training • New operator training, post accident/remedial, and refresher recommendations • Provide new resource on operator training if possible (potential partnership with Ohio Transit Risk Pool) • Develop Supervisor Training/Interviewing Operators (recorded Webinar format) • Develop Best Practice for Road Supervisor Training • Develop Supervisor Training/Report Writing • Develop Best Practice for Routing and Bus Stop Boarding and Alighting

  16. Next Steps (continued) • Workers Comp 201 • Vanpool Program Best Practice Reviews • IRM Benchmarking and Member Satisfaction Survey • Continue Serious Loss reviews and distribute Serious Loss information • Master Trainer Certification with TSI in Accident Investigation

  17. Questions

More Related