1 / 7

Commissioning plans for 3.5 TeV

Commissioning plans for 3.5 TeV. Marco Zanetti CERN. Outline. Impact on main circuits test procedures Which energy for commissioning of IPQ/D and IT? Pros and contras of 3.5 vs 5 TeV Procedure for other circuits. RB. Only for 5 TeV. RQD/F. Only for 5 TeV. RB/RQ. PLI.3:

jaimie
Download Presentation

Commissioning plans for 3.5 TeV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Commissioning plans for 3.5 TeV Marco Zanetti CERN

  2. Outline • Impact on main circuits test procedures • Which energy for commissioning of IPQ/D and IT? Pros and contras of 3.5 vs 5 TeV • Procedure for other circuits

  3. RB Only for 5 TeV

  4. RQD/F Only for 5 TeV

  5. RB/RQ • PLI.3: • I_INTERM_2 down to 6 kA (==3.54 TeV) • I_SM and I_SM_INT_n (PLI-s and first plateau of PLI.3): • Leave them as they are (I_SM=5kA, I_SM_INT_n=I_SM/5*n), or • Reduce I_SM to 4 kA and I_SM_INT_n accordingly • RB ending with heater-provoked quench and power failure • RQ ending with energy extraction from QPS • Not sizable gain on overall time (~1 shift per sector) Remark: commissioning for 5 TeV will require the re-qualification of the EE system (not enough to resume from PNO)

  6. IPQ/D and IT • Commissioning to 5 TeV: • No commissioning required when it will be decided to increase the energy. Overall gain in time (although small) • Electrical tests at 5 TeV current are more meaningful • All circuits were already commissioned to 7 TeV • No expected quenches below 5 TeV • Less parameters to be handled/memorised • No need to modify powering procedures • No change on sequencer and software in general • Commissioning to 3.5 TeV only: • possibly reduced risk (is there any risk at 5TeV?) • slightly less time for commissioning (insignificant) - however, this time might be lost due to the change of the procedures 

  7. Other circuits • No changes needed in the commissioning between 5 and 3.5 TeV

More Related