190 likes | 314 Views
Credibility Through Vision. NACM, 2006. The Bottom Line.
E N D
Credibility Through Vision NACM, 2006
The Bottom Line • “If a service does not possess a well defined strategic concept, the public and political leaders will be confused as to the role of the service, uncertain as to the necessity of its existence, and apathetic or hostile to the claims made by the service upon the resources of society.” • Samuel P. Huntington, U.S. Marine Corps Strategic Concept
WII-FM • If, • We don’t manage strategically • Then, • We don’t serve our clientele or use our resources as effectively as we can • Therefore, • We can’t make a case for ourselves • We lose our support • So, • We don’t get the resources we need • And, • Our jobs get tougher • Judicial independence suffers, and • We don’t get paid very well
Visionaries $1 investment in1926, $6,356 in 1990 Revenue Growth= 4 Job Creation= 7 Stock Price= 12 Profit Performance= 750Higher Mission Statement=ROE Comparison Group $1 investment in 1926, $955 in 1990 Revenue Growth= 1 Job Creation= 1 Stock Price= 1 No Mission Statement= ROE 7.9% Visionary Organizations
Vision • Put it before them briefly so they will read it, clearly so they will appreciate it, picturesquely so they will remember it and, above all, accurately so they will be guided by its light. • Joseph Pulitzer
What Does This Mean in NACMspeak? • Understand Purposes of Courts • Work With Others to Create Clear Vision • Take Actions That Reflect Strategic Intent • Think In the Long-Term, Anticipate Needs • Create Priorities, Concentrate Resources • Communicate With and Motivate Everyone
Vision Test • A realistic, credible, attractive future • A future that is better, more successful, or more desirable than the present • A desirable destination • An idea so energizing that it, in effect, jump starts the future by calling forth the skills, talents and resources to make it happen
The Vision Test • Keep it simple. • Can you explain it to yourself? • Can you explain it to your kids? • Say it while standing on one leg? • Trial Court Performance Standards to the rescue!
Three Key Questions • Where are we now? • Where do we go? • How do we get there? • The difference between being an entourage in an activity trap and an organization with a focus.
The Strategic Six • What is the court here to do? • How does your role contribute to what the court is here to do? • What should we be held accountable for? • What should you be held accountable for? • What are the major hindrances to getting your job done? • What do you need for you to do your job better?
Essence of It All • Focus on Contribution • Walk Your Talk • This Is Where Credibility Begins
What This Means in NACMspeak • Consistent decisions and actions • Accessible with honest, timely responses • Routinely communicate codes of ethics • Provide learning and growth opportunities • Hold self to same standards as others • Practice what you preach
Management Revolution? • Total quality management 21 percent • Empowerment 16 percent • Self managing work teams 14 percent • Job rotation 13 percent • Peer review/evaluation 11 percent • Quality circles 5 percent • Nothing 58 percent • Only one 21 percent (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1993 survey of 5,987 firms.)
What Does This Mean For Management Credibility? • No single “best practice” was embraced by a large number of firms • Many techniques work only in certain settings • Firms are still feeling their way • Maybe techniques actually yield only modest results • There’s more talk than action
Institutional Credibility? • 35 percent feel the justice system works and people get the justice they deserve • 62 percent disagree • Opinion Research Corporation, 1997
Management Credibility? • 64 percent said they don’t believe what management says • 61 percent said they aren’t informed about the organization’s plans • 54 percent said they don’t get decisions explained well
Supervisor Credibility? • 80 percent of supervisors surveyed said they routinely give employees “pats on the back”. • 80 percent of the employees said, “No they don’t.”
The Essence of Credibility • Decisions and actions consistent, communicate personal values • Honest and timely response • Know their jobs, meet face-to-face • Decide by building consensus • Foster communication and community • Provide opportunities to grow and learn • People make their own decisions • Hold self to same standards, set positive example • Give people credit • Solve problems and foster success
Credibility Tips • Know their needs and meet them • Actions speak louder than words • Establish trust through positioning • Implement the “Wallenda Factor” • Reflect back to the institution how it best thinks of itself • Kennedy, Stanford