1 / 24

Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:

Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study: Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing particles from regional sources in the U.S. and Mexico

jalena
Download Presentation

Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study: • Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing particles from regional sources in the U.S. and Mexico • Quantify contributions of U.S. and Mexican source regions responsible for poor visibility at Big Bend NP BRAVO conducted during July-October 1999 • Large network of aerosol and SO2 monitoring sites, tracer released from 4 locations, additional upper air measurements • Specialized aerosol measurements at Big Bend • Extensive data analysis and modeling (MM5,REMSAD, CMAQ)

  2. BRAVO aerosol and tracer monitoring sites and tracer release locations

  3. Tracer transport • Eagle Pass tracer > detection limit at the 6 hour sites 16% to 59% of the time (most frequently at northern sites) • Timing tracers from Eagle Pass indicated transport times most often 12-18 hours • Northeast Texas and Houston area tracers hit 6 hour sites infrequently and tends to hit all sites during an episode (broader plume) • San Antonio tracer > detection limits 15% to 34% of the time with several periods of short-term impacts at most or all sites

  4. 4 major episodes, 2-4 days duration Sulfate scattering dominated extinction

  5. Some findings • Sulfates dominated fine mass budget, followed by carbon, crustal • Secondary organics identified as important by organic speciation, but could not be apportioned • Some periods of African dust (July, August) identified from calcium deficiency, backtrajectories • Spatial pattern analysis (TAGIT) of SO2 and SO4 near Big Bend attribute 75% of SO2 to “local” sources and 90% of SO4 to “regional” sources

  6. TAGIT-SO2 method results

  7. HYSPLIT Residence time for entire BRAVO study-flow mostly from SE along border area Residence time worst 20% light scattering (6-hour periods) flow more from NE prior to along border area

  8. This episode appeared to have transport from eastern US

  9. Weak cold front passes through area, bring flow from the NE behind front-episode 3

  10. Conceptual model for late summer/early fall haze episodes at Big Bend • Weak early season cold front approaches Texas • SE flow ahead of front brings emissions from sources in east Texas/Gulf Coast inland under humid conditions • Northeast-east flow after frontal passage carries polluted airmass toward Big Bend • Flow returns to typical SE as it approached Big Bend, also carrying emissions from border area • Absolute worst-case had “back-door cold front approach from NE, carrying sulfur compounds from eastern US in additional to regional and local emissions

  11. Preliminary Particulate Sulfur Source Attributions for BRAVO by Trajectory Mass Balance Regressions- Kristi Gebhart, NPS

  12. Results using MM5 36-Km Winds

  13. Preliminary Source Attributions from Trajectory Mass Balance Regressions • Carbon I/II – 0 - 18% • East Texas – 36 - 42% • Monterrey Region, Mexico City & Volcano – 20 - 30% • El Paso Region – 0 - 7% • Eastern U.S. – 0 - 7% • Western U.S. – negligible

  14. Air Quality modeling • MM5 with 36 and 12 km grids entire 4 months, 4 km near Big Bend two 10-day episodes • CMAQ for two 10-day episodes • REMSAD for entire 4 months (36 km and 12 km)

  15. Big Brown tracer and Observed S Big Brown tracer August- Particulate S and observed iPPCH Observed S

  16. August- CMAQ and observed iPPCH 12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Big Brown tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period Look at CMAQ first… Obs Preds

  17. August- REMSAD and observed iPPCH 12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Big Brown tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period Now REMSAD… Obs Preds

  18. Houston tracer and observed S Houston tracer October- Particulate S and observed PTCH Observed S

  19. October- CMAQ and observed PTCH 12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Houston tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period Look at CMAQ first… Obs Preds

  20. 12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Houston tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period October- REMSAD and observed PTCH Now REMSAD… Obs Preds

  21. REMSAD PTCH REMSAD vs. CMAQ 36 km vs. 12 km PTCH (Houston Tracer) October 12 Graphics from AER 36 km 12 km

  22. SO4 at K-BAR, August-October 1999 from CIRA

  23. Modeling status • Modeling work is on-going • Additional work being done (CMAQ at 36 km, etc.) to help understand CMAQ transport problems • REMSAD and CMAQ sensitivity tests to assess contributions to sulfate from Mexico, east Texas, west Texas, non-Texas US areas

More Related